Connect with us

Uncategorized

The politics of Born Again Citizens

PN Balji on the political role new citizens may have in S’pore.

Published

on

PN Balji / Guest Writer

There was nothing really new in what this newsmaker was saying in an article in The Straits Times (ST Nov 28, 2008). Ms Sharmila Gunasingham, a Sri Lankan who became a Singapore citizen, was talking of how she found heaven on earth in Singapore, rising to become a partner in a law firm dominated by Chinese Singaporeans. She did it despite being a member of a minority race and a woman to boot.

What was this all about? Why was the ST devoting two full pages to a lawyer saying something we have read ad nauseum for so long, I wondered.

Then the penny dropped. Somewhere in the middle of the article was a mention of how Ms Gunasingham, the daughter of a former Sri Lankan High Commissioner to Singapore, was so touched by Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s decision to travel to Hong Kong to speak at a UBS function despite suffering from an artrial flutter that she wrote to him.

How ST came to know of the letter is a matter best left to speculation.

But what is more instructive is to look at the political dimension of the entry of the Gunasinghams of this world into Singapore and what kind of impact they will make when it comes to voting in new governments.

I call them the Born Again Citizens. Like the Born Again Christians, who are more Christian than the Christians, these new citizens are more Singaporean than those born and bred here.

Their benchmarks are different. For those who left Malaysia and sank their roots here, it is Singapore‘s meritocracy that is attractive.

A Born Again Citizen from Malaysia once told me that his meteoric rise in Singapore is something that he could never have dreamt of in Malaysia‘s race-based system. And for an acquaintance from India, the story was similar. Safety, efficiency and Little India were major pluses for him.

For many of those born here, such perks are a given. Their aspirations are different. They don’t want to be talked down to, they want more opposing views discussed openly, especially in the media, and they want more responsible Opposition representation in Parliament.

In short, more political space. And they are prepared to use their votes to get that. Political contests are such that you never know where the next electoral missile will come from.

In the last election in 2006, at least two surprises were sprung. The conventional wisdom that young voters are more prone to voting against the PAP was swept aside when the Prime Minister’s constituency saw more older citizens going against the ruling party.

Another belief that was thrown out the window in 2006: That Singaporeans will vote for the PAP when juicy carrots are thrown in front of them. They not only rejected Mr Goh Chok Tong’s promises of major spruce-up programmes in Hougang and Potong Pasir but went on to give increased majorities to Mr Low Thia Khiang and Mr Chiam See Tong.

The Born Again Citizens might just be another buffer the PAP needs to keep unpredictable election results in check.

We have heard a lot about how opening the floodgates to foreigners is vital to our economic survival. There is also a link, maybe unintended, to how they can help to maintain PAP’s political domination.

The population statistics show how big a political role this addition to Singapore‘s demographic profile can play. Since 2001, we have had 81,553 foreigners taking up the red passport. We already have nearly half a million permanent residents here, a big pool from which our new Born Again Citizens can be tapped. And then there are 143,000 foreigners on employment passes and 85,000 foreign students, another group who are potential citizens.

Go do your sums and see where they can lead to.

——————-

Retired journalist, P N Balji is now director of the Asia Journalism Fellowship

———-

***

See related posts

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Indonesia

Miss Universe cuts ties with Indonesia chapter after harassment allegations

The Miss Universe Organization severs ties with Indonesia franchise due to harassment claims. Malaysia edition canceled.

Women allege body checks before pageant. Investigation launched. Safety prioritized.

Indonesia winner to compete in November finale. Height requirement controversy.

Published

on

WASHINGTON, UNITED STATES — The Miss Universe Organization has cut ties with its Indonesia franchise, it announced days after allegations of sexual harassment, and will cancel an upcoming Malaysia edition.

In the complaint, more than a half dozen women said all 30 finalists for Miss Universe Indonesia were unexpectedly asked to strip for a supposed body check for scars and cellulite two days before the pageant’s crowning ceremony in Jakarta.

Their lawyer said Tuesday that five of the women had their pictures taken.

“In light of what we have learned took place at Miss Universe Indonesia, it has become clear that this franchise has not lived up to our brand standards, ethics, or expectations,” the US-based Miss Universe Organization posted Saturday night on social media site X, formerly known as Twitter.

It said that it had “decided to terminate the relationship with its current franchise in Indonesia, PT Capella Swastika Karya, and its National Director, Poppy Capella.”

It thanked the contestants for their bravery in coming forward and added that “providing a safe place for women” was the organization’s priority.

Jakarta police spokesman Trunoyudo Wisnu Andiko said Tuesday that an investigation into the women’s complaint has been launched.

The Indonesia franchise also holds the license for Miss Universe Malaysia, where there will no longer be a competition this year, according to the New York-based parent organizer.

In a lengthy statement posted to Instagram, Indonesia franchise director Capella denied involvement in any body checks.

“I, as the National Director and as the owner of the Miss Universe Indonesia license, was not involved at all and have never known, ordered, requested or allowed anyone who played a role and participated in the process of organizing Miss Universe Indonesia 2023 to commit violence or sexual harassment through body checking,” she wrote.

She added that she is against “any form of violence or sexual harassment.”

The Jakarta competition was held from 29 July to 3 August to choose Indonesia’s representative to the 2023 Miss Universe contest, and was won by Fabienne Nicole Groeneveld.

Miss Universe said it would make arrangements for her to compete in the finale, scheduled for November in El Salvador.

This year’s Indonesia pageant also came under fire for announcing a “significant change in this (year’s) competition guidelines” with the elimination of its minimum height requirement after it had crowned a winner.

In its statement, the Miss Universe Organization said it wanted to “make it extremely clear that there are no measurements such as height, weight, or body dimensions required to join a Miss Universe pageant worldwide.”

— AFP

Continue Reading

Malaysia

A Perodua service centre in Kuantan, Malaysia went viral for its strict dress code, Perodua responds

A dress code for vehicle servicing? A Malaysian car brand’s service centre dress code signage has puzzled netizens, raising queries about the need for attire rules during a routine service.

The manufacturer responded with an official statement after a flurry of comments, seeking to clarify and apologize.

Published

on

By

MALAYSIA: A dress code signage positioned at a service centre belonging to a prominent Malaysian car brand has sparked bewilderment among Malaysian netizens, who question the necessity of adhering to attire guidelines for a simple vehicle servicing.

The signage explicitly delineates clothing items that are deemed unsuitable, including sleeveless tops, short skirts, abbreviated pants, and distressed jeans.

The car manufacturer swiftly found itself flooded with comments from both inquisitive and irked Malaysian netizens. This surge in online activity prompted the company to issue an official statement aimed at clarifying the situation and extending an apology.

In a post that gained significant traction on the social media platform, politician Quek Tai Seong of Pahang State, Malaysia, shared an image to Facebook on Monday (7 Aug).

The image showcased a dress code sign prominently displayed at a Perodua Service Centre in Kuantan. Within the post, Quek posed the question: “Is this dress code applicable nationwide, or is it specific to this branch?”

The signage reads, “All customers dealing with Perodua Service Kuantan 1, Semambu, are requested to dress modestly and appropriately.”

Adding visual clarity to these guidelines, the sign features illustrative graphics that explicitly outline clothing items deemed unacceptable, including sleeveless tops, short skirts, short pants, and ripped jeans.

Delineating the specifics of the dress code, the signage stipulates that male visitors are expected to don shirts accompanied by neckties, opt for long pants, and wear closed shoes.

Conversely, female visitors are advised to don long-sleeved shirts, full-length skirts, and closed-toe footwear.

Perodua’s dress code sparks online uproar

Following the rapid spread of the post, Perodua’s official Facebook page found itself inundated with comments from both intrigued and frustrated Malaysian netizens, all seeking clarifications about the newly surfaced dress code policy.

Amidst the flurry of comments, numerous incensed netizens posed pointed questions such as, “What is the rationale behind the introduction of such regulations by the management? We demand an explanation.”

Another netizen expressed their dissatisfaction, arguing against the necessity of the rule and urging Perodua to take inspiration from the practices of other 4S (Sales, Service, Spare Parts, and Survey) automotive dealerships.

A concerned Facebook user chimed in, advocating for a more lenient stance, asserting that attempting to dictate customers’ clothing choices might not be in the company’s best interest.

Someone also commented in an angry tone, “Oi what is this? Going there for car service, not interview or working, right.”

As the discourse unfolded, it became evident that while some inquiries carried genuine weight, others chose to inject humor into the situation, playfully remarking, “If I wanted to buy a Myvi, I should buy or rent a formal attire first.”

“I sell economy rice at a hawker centre, I have never worn a long sleeve shirt and a tie… I guess I will not buy a Perodua car then.”

“I guess they will not serve those who wear short pants.”

Perodua addresses dress code controversy

As reported by Chinese media outlet Sin Chew Daily News, the manager of Kuantan’s Perodua Service Centre had acknowledged that the images on the dress code signage were misleading.

In response, the manager divulged that discussions had transpired with the head office, leading to the prompt removal of the signage to prevent any further misconceptions.

The manager clarifies, “We do encourage visitors to adhere to the dress etiquette, but we won’t go to the extent of restricting their choice of attire.”

He also revealed that currently, no complaints have been directly received from the public.

However, feedback from certain customers was relayed through Perodua’s agents.

Perodua also released an official statement by chief operating officer JK Rozman Jaffar on Wednesday (9 Aug) regarding the dress code on their official Facebook page.

The statement stated the dress code etiquette is not aligned with their official guidelines and they are currently conducting an official investigation on the matter followed by corrective measures to avoid the same incident from happening.

Perodua also extends its apologies for any inconvenience caused.

 

Continue Reading

Trending