Guest contributor

When Minister for National Development, Mr Mah Bow Tan, publicly said that “each town council has the duty to explain to its residents how it invests its funds, what is its philosophy, what are the risks it takes’, (Sunday Times, Nov 23) he unfortunately did not say the level of details and transparency that the town councils should go adopt.

The replies received so far by our readers who queried their town councils direct residents to the town councils’ annual reports and financial statements. They seem to assert that the annual reports and financial statements can answer residents’ questions.

We did a review of several town councils’ financial statements and were able to obtain some information. For example, the HOLLAND-BUKIT PANJANG TOWN COUNCIL 2007 Financial Statements has a RISK MANAGEMENT POLICIES FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS section under SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES in NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. (See here)

The NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS also gave a breakdown of investment at fair value:

Bonds
– $32,954,666

Unit trusts – $6,110,600

Quoted structured deposits – $15,423,400

Unquoted structured deposits – $5,000,000

Residents reading the report can get a general idea of “how it invests its funds”, and “what is its philosophy”. However, this level of explanation does not account for the actual investment operations. There is no information on how and why the town council decided on any major investment? There is no listing of which financial products the town council has invested in and how much was invested? It is not possible to judge if the investment decisions complied with the stated investment philosophy or assess the actual risk of each and every individual investment.

The town council invested $6.1M in unit trusts – what are these unit trusts? Can the town council list the top 10 unit trusts? Can the town council list the top 10 quoted structured deposits?

What is the $5M unquoted structured deposits?

These are the questions residents need answers to, to fully understand the town council’s investment philosophy and assess the actual financial risks the town council is taking, which Mr Mah mentioned.

Another example we want to highlight is the Jurong Town Council Report and Financial Statements 2008.

In the news report, “Town councils’ sinking funds not substantially affected by financial turmoil” (CNA 28 October 2008),

It was reported that, “For Jurong Town Council, it has not invested in any Lehman—linked products, but explains that it only spends about 18 per cent or S$15 million of its S$84 million sinking funds in slightly riskier products.”

While that statement is reassuring, residents may be curious to find out what the “structured notes” are, which the town council had invested $5m in (page 29 of the report). What is the name of this structured notes? How is this structured notes different from the Lehman-linked products in terms of risk?

Until and unless town councils disclose fully the answers to such questions as the ones above, it is of no use referring residents to the annual reports. For what you get are general statements which gives you only general answers.

They do not tell you “how it invests its funds, what is its philosophy, what are the risks it takes”, something which Minister Mah himself said town councils should do.

———–

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Indian national air-con repairman from ST Synthesis with S$800 monthly salary gets 10 days’ jail for negligently causing fire at police HQ

A 30-year-old air-conditioner repairman from India has been sentenced to 10 days’…

MOH preliminary confirms 657 additional cases of COVID-19 infection; Total tally at 18,205 cases.

As of 3 May 2020, 12pm, the Ministry of Health (MOH) has…

印尼林火380热点 我国亦受烟霾影响

新加坡环境局(NEA)指出,若苏门答腊岛林火热点的局势持续,我国仍会收到烟霾影响,而今早局部地区空气素质也接近不健康水平。 当局在官网上指出,苏门答腊昨日(9月9日)仍然天气干燥,检测到岛上共有380个林火热点,主要位于苏门答腊岛中部和南部。 “有些仍在燃烧的林火热点为占碑(Jambi)和廖内(Riau)境内带来中度至浓厚的烟霾,马来西亚的马六甲海峡和半岛西部也受到影响。” “苏门答腊南部和楠榜省(Lampung)也发现了引起烟霾的林火热点。” 当局指出,预计苏门答腊的干燥天气将会持续数天,而季候风将持续从东南部或南部吹来,我国或将会受到烟霾的袭击。 当局也指出,若以一小时PM2.5指数来看,预计今日内空气质量将会维持在正常和偏高水平,而24小时空气污染指数已经达到适中水平。 “我们会继续密切关注空气情况,目前每个人都可以继续日常活动。” 至到截稿为止,我国的24小时空气污染指数仍然处于适中水平,南部和东部都超过90点,而国内的PM2.5指数都处于正常水平。 当局也建议身体有不适的国人,尤其是年长者或小孩,及心脏病或肺病患者尽快求医。

含超标致癌物 卫生科学局回收三含药物

卫生科学局召回三种含有超标致癌物的药物二甲双胍(metformin)。据悉二甲双胍被广泛用于治疗初期二型糖尿病患。 卫生科学局昨日(4日)发文告表示,在测试了46种二甲双胍药物中,发现三种药物含有可能超标致癌物“N-亚硝基二甲胺”(简称NDMA)。 惟,卫生科学局澄清说受影响的药物由于在我国售卖时间不长,因此对病人并不会造成太大的风险。 卫生科学局正与供应商以及国际组织合作核实受影响原因,日后也会提出相关措施应对。 由于停止使用药物会使血糖突然攀升,为避免造成更大的风险,卫生科学局也呼吁民众不要擅自停止使用,可以和主治医师沟通。 此外,卫生科学局也建议医疗人员应尽快安排病患更换药物。 N-亚硝基二甲胺通常出现在加工食品、肉制品与低水平的空气污染中。最近还发现,出现在部分药物中。目前全球已遭会发现含有这些杂质的药物 美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)周三(12月4日)表示,该机构正在对美国市场售卖的抗糖尿病药物二甲双胍进行抽样检查,若有必要就会召回相关药物。 欧洲药品管理局(EMA)则表示,至今尚未发现欧盟市场所售卖的二甲双胍含超标的NDMA。病人应该继续服用医生所开的药物。