Update: Parliament rejects motion to fine-tune electoral system. “PM Lee said Singapore must never blindly follow others.” – Channel NewsAsia. NMP Siew Kum Hong, who helped with the poll, mentioned the poll results in Parliament today.

Watch the video of Mr Siew’s speech here – TOC TV.

The following is a media release by The Online Citizen to the local media.

Singapore, 27 August 2008 – Internet portal The Online Citizen (www.theonlinecitizen.com) today published the results of a street poll on the question of whether a by-election should be held in the Jurong Group Representation Constituency (GRC), with 60.1% of all respondents who had an opinion saying that one should be held.

Dr. Ong Chit Chung, a Member of Parliament (MP) for Jurong GRC, passed away on 14 July 2008. Since then, the Government has stated that the law does not require it to hold a by-election, and it does not intend to do so. Instead, the remaining four MPs for Jurong GRC will take turns to cover for the duties of the late Dr. Ong.

Two Nominated Members of Parliament, Professor Thio Li-Ann and Dr. Loo Choon Yong, have filed a motion for Parliament to debate the question of when a by-election should be held. This debate is expected to take place over 26 and 27 August 2008.

The Online Citizen decided to conduct the street poll, to ascertain what Singaporeans actually thought. A team of volunteers conducted the poll on 23 August 2008, in different parts of Jurong GRC. The findings of the poll are enclosed.

A total of 478 Singapore citizens were polled, of whom 312 (65.3%) were residents of Jurong GRC and 166 (34.7%) were not. 122 respondents (25.5%) did not know whether a by-election should be held. Of the remainder, 214 (44.8% of all respondents, or 60.1% of those with an opinion) stated that a by-election should be held in Jurong GRC, while 142 (29.7% of all respondents, or 39.9% of those with an opinion) disagreed.

Of the 312 residents of Jurong GRC polled, 85 (27.2%) did not know whether a by-election should be held. 129 residents (41.3% of all residents, or 56.8% of those with an opinion) thought that a by-election should be held in Jurong GRC, and 98 (31.4% of all residents, or 43.2% of those with an opinion) did not think so.

Of the further 166 persons polled who were not residents of Jurong GRC, 37 (22.3%) did not know whether a by-election should be held. 85 non-residents (51.2% of all non-residents, or 65.9% of those with an opinion) felt that a by-election should be held in Jurong GRC, and 44 (26.5% of all non-residents, or 34.1% of those with an opinion) did not think so.

“We decided to do the poll because no one was doing it – getting the opinion of the people most involved or affected by the way their constituency is run, the people of Jurong GRC,” said Andrew Loh, Deputy Editor of The Online Citizen. “Although it was a simple poll of 2 questions, it gives a reasonable feel of what the people of Jurong GRC think about the issue of having a by-election there, in the wake of the passing of one of its MPs, Dr Ong Chit Chung. 478 Singaporeans is a decent number to poll, considering our very limited resources.”

The Online Citizen hopes to work on more projects of such nature, to directly convey the true opinions of Singaporeans on the ground.

About theonlinecitizen.com

The Online Citizen is a blogsite run by volunteer Singaporeans sharing their views and experiences on current affairs and issues of concern.

FINDINGS OF STREET POLL CONDUCTED BY THE ONLINE CITIZEN ON 23 AUGUST 2008

SHOULD THERE BE A BY-ELECTION IN JURONG GRC?

Executive summary

On Saturday 23 August 2008, theonlinecitizen.com (TOC) conducted a street poll to find out Singaporeans’ views on whether there should be a by-election in Jurong GRC, in light of the passing away of Member of Parliament Dr. Ong Chit Chung.

The key findings of the poll are as follows:

§ <!–[endif]–>A total of 478 Singapore citizens were polled, of whom 312 (65.3%) were residents of Jurong GRC and 166 (34.7%) were not. 122 respondents (25.5%) did not know whether a by-election should be held. Of the remainder, 214 (44.8% of all respondents, or 60.1% of those with an opinion) stated that a by-election should be held in Jurong GRC, while 142 (29.7% of all respondents, or 39.9% of those with an opinion) disagreed.

§ <!–[endif]–>Of the 312 residents of Jurong GRC polled, 85 (27.2%) did not know whether a by-election should be held. 129 residents (41.3% of all residents, or 56.8% of those with an opinion) thought that a by-election should be held in Jurong GRC, and 98 (31.4% of all residents, or 43.2% of those with an opinion) did not think so.

§ <!–[endif]–>Of the further 166 persons polled who were not residents of Jurong GRC, 37 (22.3%) did not know whether a by-election should be held. 85 non-residents (51.2% of all non-residents, or 65.9% of those with an opinion) felt that a by-election should be held in Jurong GRC, and 44 (26.5% of all non-residents, or 34.1% of those with an opinion) did not think so.

Methodology

A team of volunteers hit different parts of Jurong GRC to ask Singapore citizens two questions:

1. Are you a resident of Jurong GRC?

2. Dr. Ong Chit Chung passed away recently. Do you think that there should be a by-election in Jurong GRC?

Only answers from respondents who identified themselves as Singapore citizens were recorded. No answers were recorded from those who identified themselves as not being Singapore citizens. Respondents were not asked to verify their citizenship.

The poll was strictly anonymous, and no personal particulars were recorded. There was no systematic sampling of respondents, and selection of respondents was entirely random.

There was no attempt made to ensure, and TOC does not represent, that the sample of respondents used by the poll was statistically valid and/or representative of Singaporeans or any other group. To the extent that there was any choice in the location of the polling, it was only to maximize pedestrian traffic for pollsters to approach.

Detailed results

The following tables set out the detailed results and findings of the street poll:

TABLE A

Breakdown of respondents

Total

%age

Singapore citizens

478

100.0%

Residents of Jurong GRC

312

65.3%

Non-residents of Jurong GRC

166

34.7%

TABLE B

Residents and non-residents of Jurong GRC combined

Total

%age

Responses to question: “Do you think that there should be a by-election in Jurong GRC?”

478

100.0%

Yes

214

44.8%

No

142

29.7%

Don’t know

122

25.5%

Only considering “Yes” and “No” responses

Total “Yes” and “No” responses

356

100.0%

Yes

214

60.1%

No

142

39.9%

TABLE C

Residents of Jurong GRC only

Total

%age

Responses to question: “Do you think that there should be a by-election in Jurong GRC?”

312

100.0%

Yes

129

41.3%

No

98

31.4%

Don’t know

85

27.2%

Only considering “Yes” and “No” responses

Total “Yes” and “No” responses

227

100.0%

Yes

129

56.8%

No

98

43.2%

TABLE D

Non-residents of Jurong GRC only

Total

%age

Responses to question: “Do you think that there should be a by-election in Jurong GRC?”

166

100.0%

Yes

85

51.2%

No

44

26.5%

Don’t know

37

22.3%

Only considering “Yes” and “No” responses

Total “Yes” and “No” responses

129

100.0%

Yes

85

65.9%

No

44

34.1%

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Mis-informed demonisation of LGBTs?

Donaldson Tan rebuts criticisms of LGBT community.

【冠状病毒19】新增六例入境病例 包括三及七岁印度女童

根据卫生部文告,新增六例入境病例,分别从印度、阿联酋、中国和越南抵境。 两名新加坡人在8月7日和8日,从印度和阿拉伯联合酋长国返回我国。 本月10日,持家属准证的三岁和七岁女童,从印度抵达新加坡。 本月7日,一名工作准证持有者从中国抵新;另一名学生证持有者,从越南抵境。 这六例入境病例都没出现症状,入境后遵守居家通知也接受冠病检测。 社区病例方面,两名印度籍工作证持有者,在8月19日确诊,一人与早前病例有关联。 本地累计确诊已增至5万6031例。尚有87人仍在住院,转入社区设施的多达3107人。 此外有再有277人出院或离开社区隔离设施,累计康复人数增至5万2810个。本地累计死亡病例维持27例。  

Former NTUC chairman and PAP MP, Phey Yew Kok sentenced to 60 months imprisonment

Former NTUC chairman and former People’s Action Party MP Phey Yew Kok,…

民主党称资料参考《海时》 人力部重申本地被裁PMET无增长趋势

针对民主党反驳,该党被要求更正的文章和贴文,资料参考来源来自《海峡时报》等报导,人力部也很快作出回应。 该部在昨日的声明中解释,有关《海时》报导指的是,在2018年被裁的7070位本地人中,PMET(专业人士、经理、执行人员以及技师)群体有所增加。 该部指民主党则似乎是譬喻,2018年在所有本土125万4000名PMET中,被裁人数增长。 该部续而解释,本地PMET 被裁人数,从2015年的5460人,降至去年的5360人,也是自2014年以来最低的被裁人数。 人力部也表示,在今年4月1日的国会答复中,也说明目前有更多本地人受雇于PMET职业,故此如有裁员动作,更多受影响的本地人为PMET群体。 该部重申对民主党发出更正指示,乃是为了澄清并没有本地PMET裁员的上升趋势,再者该群体的就业率,实则持续增长。 该部声称实际情况和民主党所描述的有非常不同的落差。“在当前经济不确定时期,我们理解国人关注就业情况。人力部目的乃是指出错误/误导性声明,确保在有关就业等重要议题的公共辩论,能立基于准确事实。” 该部也表示已收到民主党的申请,该部也会考量该党要求撤回更正指示的理据。 此前,人力部透过《防假消息法》办事处,向新加坡民主党发出指示,要求更正两则脸书贴文和一则文章,指其中含有不实讯息。 相关脸书贴文分别发布于11月30日以及12月2日,贴文分享该党官网誌期6月8日的文章,其中的图表提及本地PMET的失业率上升,以及外籍PMET逐步增长。 不过,民主党也表示,仍会依循《防假消息法》,向人力部提出上诉要求撤回更正指示。