Gerald Giam / Deputy Editor

As August 9th draws near, springing up all over the island are posters of smiling People’s Action Party Members of Parliament (MP) and Government ministers wishing Singaporeans a Happy National Day. While this might be a regular sight that Singaporeans have been conditioned to accept all these years, I question its necessity.

Like most other Singaporeans, I love National Day and the festivities that come with it. Singapore has achieved much over the past 43 years and we have much to be proud of and grateful for.

But why is there a need for politicians to splash their faces across every other National Day poster? In my little sub-constituency of Canberra in Sembawang GRC, I have counted at least two giant sized billboards.

When I travel through Ang Mo Kio, Bukit Timah and Tanjong Pagar, almost every other lamp post on the main roads is decked with smiling pictures of PAP politicians superimposed on pictures of children. The main intersection of each town has a giant billboard with all the MPs in the GRC waving, some even with their names and titles labelled on their photos, lest any resident forgets.

One huge billboard in Joo Chiat even has a politician with his fist clenched across his chest, as if reciting the Pledge. (Picture right).

The purpose of these billboards is quite clear: to give the MPs more visibility so that residents will recognize them and hopefully vote for them at the next elections.

Who pays?

I am guessing all these posters and billboards are not paid out of PAP coffers, but from town council funds — to which I contribute over $740 each year.

I emailed Sembawang Town Council and Tanjong Pagar Town Council to ask, but they did not reply. Strange, since my town council has always been very prompt in replying to the municipal problems I have raised.

Is this a prudent use of my hard-earned money, particularly in a time of a slowing economy and high inflation? Why should my town council payments be used to further my MP’s political interests?

Worse, some giant billboards are lit up the entire night with bright spotlights. What happened to our eco-friendly drive? And what about the cost of the electricity used, keeping in mind that the prices of fuel have increased recently.

In fact, some of these posters look no different from election posters sans the lightning symbol. Doesn’t the Parliamentary Elections Act prohibit election advertising outside of the campaign period?

I do not see posters of MPs in opposition wards of Potong Pasir and Hougang. In Potong Pasir, there are some posters, but without Chiam See Tong’s face. Hougang has a simple landscaped display of the Singapore flag along Avenue 2 – and no, Low Thia Khiang’s picture is not included either.

Views of other Singaporeans

I checked with a Singaporean friend living in the US whether such banners and posters appeared on the 4th of July, America‘s Independence Day. There were none in the city where she lives.

She emailed me, “I personally think that the banners…look hideous and distasteful. When I tried to raise this matter up with someone a long time ago, I remember being told off that those posters were being targeted at the heartlanders.”

She added, “To put banners like the one you sent me…when there is no GE (General Election) near in sight, that’s definitely propagandistic”.

Another friend, who works in the media, told me: “It gets very confusing here. Can’t tell the difference between country, state, government and ruling party.”

Suggestions

I would like to suggest that the PAP and its town councils immediately stop the use of public funds to promote their partisan causes. For a start, all the spotlights for the billboards should remain off at night to save electricity.

I hope our ruling party MPs realise that National Day is a day of celebration for the whole nation, not a season to honour themselves.

Click on pictures to enlarge.———

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

摩托车拒停 执法人员追逐失控摔车

日前一名执法人员在追截一辆摩托车时被路过的车子撞倒,过程被车内录像拍摄下来,网赞执法人员尽忠职守,为追捕违规车辆跌倒 这段视频被放上脸书专页Roads.sg,引起网民关注,视频内可见,当时车主正在T字路口待转左,突然一辆摩托车从侧旁行驶过去,直冲对面马路,紧随着一辆陆交局执法人员,相信是正在追捕前者。 但因为当时车主已准备左转,没料到执法人员在旁,便在转弯时将执法人撞倒,失控摔车,所幸他并无大碍,在撞倒后又站起身来。 陆交局发言人称该事故发生在本周一(13日)早上10点10分,当时执法人员要求该摩托车停下,但遭对方拒绝,才会开始和追逐,朝往振瑞路方向的克里门梭道(Clemenceau Avenue)。目前当局已经介入调查。 视频一出后,引起网友的关注,网友纷纷赞叹执法人员的尽责。 网友 Ah Wong San : 谢谢执法人员,很多小型电动车经过改装,与大型电动车的速度不同,陆交局官员应该提升他们的车子。…

吐口水、怒骂快餐店职员 妇女明被控上庭

今年4月22日,一名女子被拍到对着肯德基服务店员大声斥责,离去前还向店员吐口水,行为引起网民议论。警方较后确认女子身份,并在两天后将她逮捕。 这名42岁妇女将在明日被控上法庭,罪状包括蓄意骚扰、动粗以及违法安全距离措施。 据了解,这名妇女疑因久等外带食物的准备而发怒,在快餐店前怒骂职员“全家去死”并吐口水。 一旦公共滋扰罪名成立,妇女将可能被罚款2000元,而在知情下导致受害者受伤、感到危险或烦扰,惩罚或会改成长达三个月的监禁、或不超过2000元的罚款,或两者兼施。

维权人士鄞义林抨击我国政府不为低薪劳工设立最低薪资标准

目前旅居台湾的部落客兼维权人士鄞义林,于周一(26日)在脸书上抨击我国政府仍不主张提高本地人工资,即使他们可能只能勉强维持生计。 日前《今日报》的一篇文章名为《The Big Read:低收入家庭无法维持生计,需另寻出入》,作者讲述低收入无法在新加坡生存,因为他们的开支比月收入更高。 根据一项家庭调查指出,家庭收入最低20巴仙者,每月的开销达2570新元,但其月收入仅达2235新元(含政府发放的福利),足足差了335新元,因而导致入不敷出的现象。 作者也引用了数名人民行动党议员的言论,如裕廊集选区议员玛赞(Rahayu Mahzam)曾表示,低收入户之所以面临财务问题,,是基于积欠长期的债务。她说,尽管目前未有立即性的解决方案,但政府仍然会持续关注课题,以寻找最适合的解决方法。 其次,义顺集选区议员黄国光(Louis Ng)也曾向《今日报》强调,经过多年的努力,养育孩子的开销已变得更加实惠;而马林百列集选区议员谢健平(Seah Kian Peng)也曾以奶粉为例,解释现在的奶粉只需30新元可轻易购买,形容如今的生活开销更实惠。 惹兰勿刹集选区议员梁莉莉医生(Lily…

Netizens call out an online user for sliming Workers’ Party over PMD accident that left elderly woman in coma

On Saturday (21 September), a 65-year-old woman was knocked down after her…