Tan Jian Wei / Writer

I used to remember the days when I had to be at the parade square by 7.25am every day to sing the national anthem and recite the pledge.

School songs used to be sung only on Mondays and later on, on both Tuesdays and Thursdays when there were English and Mandarin versions of it. Needless to say that by the time I got to the school which had 2 versions of school songs to learn, I had stopped bothering with memorizing the lyrics. But the one constant through all those mornings that I spent in school was the pledge and national anthem.

Since finishing the first year of National Service, I have had hardly any opportunity to sing the national anthem or recite the pledge. I have come to see August 9, National Day, as a day when I can do both of the above. Some people may say that there really isn’t much meaning or purpose in singing the national anthem and I used to think along the same lines back in primary school.

It just seemed like a chore. I even pondered why we school children had to sing the same song over and over again every day. After all, even if we hadn’t learnt the words to the national anthem in Primary 1, surely we would have known by Primary 2, having sung one year’s worth of national anthem?

Seconday school was thus a turning point for me in this aspect. Singing the school song was a much more passionate affair to me given the school spirit that had been inculcated within us. It was apparent many of my school mates sang the school song with a lot more zest than the national anthem. It dawned on me that it was really all about how passionate one felt about being a Singaporean.

At that time, as I became more aware of what was going on in and outside of Singapore, I began to realize how blessed I was to have grown up and stayed here all my life. I am proud of being a Singaporean, which is why I have sung our national anthem with pride ever since my years in secondary school.

I’m not sure what my fellow Singaporeans feel about seeing the national anthem and/or reciting the pledge but when I watch soccer/rugby/baseball matches on cable TV, I can see the players and spectators singing their national anthems with pride, gusto and zest. Whether it is the Star-Spangled Banner or God Defend New Zealand, it is hard to find anyone in the stadia not singing their own national anthems. Do correct me if I’m wrong but sporting events are some of the few events at which one can sing his/her national anthem. This only serves to make me appreciate the opportunities that come my way when I am able to sing Majulah Singapura.

So come this August 9th during the National Day Parade, you can be sure that I will be singing our national anthem with a lot of pride, gusto and fervour, even if I’m not able to attend the parade itself in person. And I hope you do the same as well.

————

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Govt accepts recommendations of Active Mobility Advisory Panel; restricts speed limit for PMDs to 10km/h on footpaths

The Ministry of Transport (MOT) has announced that it has accepted all…

各国”反假新闻法“比一比

我国总理李显龙在本月9日,在新马领导人非正式会议后的联合记者会上,被记者质问其对防假消息法的立场。 记者指防假消息法遭到新加坡国内外人士质疑,包括”无国界记者“组织也抨击新法案可能赋予政府过大权力。 当时,总理表示,不清楚马国打算废除的《反假新闻法》内容,不过他捍卫新加坡政府要推行的《防止网络假消息和网络操纵法案》,指出不止新加坡,德国、法国和澳洲都有立法对付,连英国也考虑透过司法管制网络假消息。 既然总理提到其他国家也有反假新闻法,本社简略整理我国和其他四个国家:法、德、澳洲和马来西亚相关“反假新闻法”,对比其中的区别: 各国“假消息法”类型 《2019年防止网络假消息与网络操纵法案》 2019年4月1日在国会一读 2018年,出台第2018-1202法令和2018-1201组织性法案,打击信息操纵 2018年出台《社交网络强制法》(Netzwerk-durchsetzung-sgesetz,简称NetzDG) 澳洲国会于本月4日通过《分享重大暴力内容》刑法典修正案(Criminal Code Amendment…

明年起禁雇主替女佣保管薪资钱财

人力部于周日(10月7日)宣布,从明年1月1日起,雇主将不得替女佣保管薪资和钱财。 人力部称,该部每年约接到600宗薪资纠纷,大部分都与钱财保管有关。该部认为,由雇主替女佣保管钱财,对劳资双方都很容易造成不便,也有风险。 要用钱的女佣还需向雇主拿钱,雇主也得不厌其烦、帮女佣核对转账回乡的金额。而一些女佣也不放心由雇主管钱。 人力部也提及,雇主和女佣也因为管理金额产生分歧,曾有雇主癫痫发作陷入昏迷,女佣拿不到她的钱;另一案例则是客工在雇主处累积存放了1万1千新元。可是,当她准备取钱时,雇主却陷入财务困难,只好分期付款。 易引起劳资纠纷 人力部重申,按时缴付雇员足额薪资,乃是雇主的责任。雇主将不得再为女佣保管薪资。而任何违反工作准证条件的雇主,即违反了《雇佣外籍劳工法》(EFMA),执法单位有权对雇主采取行动。违法的雇主可面对1万元罚款,或监禁12个月。 人力部也建议雇主改用电子转账方式发工资。在替客工申请工作准证时,就可一并替他们申请POSB转账户口。 另一方面,客工人道组织(HOME)则呼吁政府强制规定以电子转账方式缴付客工工资,同时,也为那些雇主陷入财困/破产而无法拿到工资的客工,设立法定基金。 从去年4月至今年3月,客工人道组织共受理872宗客工个案,其中有40巴仙(342宗)都与薪资有关。 不久前,律政部刚宣布,将管制旅居狮城的外籍人士的贷款上限。这些外籍人士指的是持有工作准证、长期居留证、短期居留证、家属准证和留学生证的群体。 有助减缓客工借高利贷现象 该部规定,旅居新加坡、年收入少于1万新元的外籍人士,只能从合法贷款公司借款最多1千500元。这意味着,许多客工都属此例。至于年收入介于1万至2万元者,能接待不超过3千元。…

人权律师拉维:有违议长应保持中立精神 陈川仁对部长声明表态不妥

撰文:人权律师M.Ravi  翻译:北雁 在本周二(2月12日),国会议长陈川仁在脸书发文表示,同意卫生部当初不把艾滋病患数据泄漏事件公之于众的决定和考量。 陈川仁表示“密切”聆听了颜金勇的解释,最后又把问题抛给群众,询问他们如果在相同情境下,他们会怎么做。当然本文并非要讨论群众该做什么,而是针对身为国会议长的陈川仁先生,指出他的可为和有所不可为。 身为议长,陈川仁就是国会中的首席官员,他有责任主持议会,确保议会事务顺利进行,而不是卷入议会和议员们的辩论,他有责任保持公正不偏袒。 2017年,他受委为第十届国会议长,也承诺在主持议会事务上会保持“不偏袒、中立和客观”。诸君也可到国会网站,上面也阐述了议长必须对所有议员一视同仁不偏袒。 然而,他在脸书对课题发表上述声明,是否已贬低了议长的身份,形同摒弃了他强调、也理应维护的客观公正? 以下为陈川仁对艾滋数据泄露事件发表观点的脸书贴文: 根据《议会法》(特权豁免权和权利)(第217章)第3(1)条,议长的豁免权和权限,自共和国创立以来就和英国国会类同。在厄尔斯金梅(Erskine May)撰写的《议会惯例》–一本有关议会程序和守则的权威教科书,也提到下议院院长的主要性质,即是保持权威和公正。 那么假设国会议员、在此情况下就是议长本身–若藐视议会程序,那么有几个方案可以遵循。 一,提呈违反特权动议,交特权委员会审理议长。…