Choo Zheng Xi / Editor-in-Chief

Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong recently addressed grassroots leaders at a National Day event in Hougang. In his address, he gave Hougang grassroots leaders an idea of how to play the role of an effective “opposition” in the ward. He suggested that they:

“Study the annual accounts of the town council to ensure that the funds are properly used. Check whether the arrears for S&C (service and conservancy) charges are piling up, and eating into their reserves. Make sure that enough money is put aside for cyclical maintenance.”

Whether wittingly or not, Mr Goh unveiled the blatantly political purpose of grassroots organizations. It is also doubly unfortunate that he chose a National Day event to openly encourage this politicization: surely Singapore is larger than the People’s Action Party (PAP) and its supporters?

For Party or Community?

The People’s Association (PA) is the umbrella organization that funds all grassroots organizations. The PA website states that its mission is to “bring people together to take ownership of and contribute to community well-being” and strengthen racial harmony ties. Nowhere in its mission statement do we see Mr Goh’s goal of keeping the PAP in power.

The ideal of community bonding at the grassroots level is a noble one: a strong community spirit facilitates mutual assistance. The value of this mutual assistance should not be underestimated in our densely populated living environment. Strong community bonding can make our spatially challenged habitats not just tolerable, but enjoyable.

One of the touching examples of community spirit is the Seletar Chronice (http://seletarchronicle.com/), a newsletter set up by the residents of Seletar to highlight community events and news. This is done completely on the resident’s initiative, without prompting by a PA sponsored Resident’s Committee (RC). Some posts highlight the wildlife treks around the area, and one post nostalgically reminicises about old friends who grew up in the area but who have since moved away:

“All say that living in Seletar were among the sweetest days of their lives for the nature and the community, and the sense of historical continuity. They have settled elsewhere and made other lives, but Seletar still holds that special place for them”.

How much of such genuine community building spirit is lost when the energies of RCs are spent doing dirt-digging on the political opposition? Good Singaporeans who are passionate about creating activities for the benefit of their communities, but who do not want to involve themselves in partisan politics, will naturally be put off grassroots work. This is a pity.

Nation before Party

Mr Goh was, in my opinion, right in his criticism of Mr Low for not providing Singaporeans with an alternative to the PAP system of government, and too narrowly defining his role as that of a watchdog.

Still, frustration with the opposition aside, Mr Goh was speaking to the wrong audience at the wrong event. He was not speaking to PAP cadres at a party strategy planning forum. He was speaking at a National Day event, and Singapore consists of more than the 66.6% of the population that voted for the PAP.

One can’t help feeling there is something self-serving behind the PAP’s consistent blurring of the lines between State and Party. Lampposts are festooned with National Day banners bearing the faces of PAP Members of Parliament (MP).

While I understand that these people are faces of the elected government of The Republic of Singapore, surely there is much that Singaporeans identify more with than MPs they hardly know the names of.

On a practical level, we must question where the funds to print such banners comes from. Does it come from a general pool of money that has been set aside for National Day celebrations? If so, why are there no banners provided for opposition wards Hougang and Potong Pasir? Why are such funds being utilized to finance a subliminal annual election campaign?

This self-serving tendency needs to be controlled. There are more appropriate platforms for electioneering than our Nation’s birthday. National Day electioneering emotionally disenfranchises the 33.3% of Singaporeans that voted against the PAP, and the hundreds of thousands of other voters who would have if their electoral wards were not walkovers.

Regardless of how viscerally we dislike the PAP, there is much to love about our country and the communities we live in. I wish people like SM Goh would make it easier for people who dislike the PAP to identify with and love our country without having to associate it with partisan politics.

——————

Read also: “Why so silent, PAP Town Councils?” by Andrew Loh.

——–

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

TOC Feature: Better things to come for S'pore football? Really?

By Shankar Selvam and Gangasudhan The defence of the Malaysian Soccer League…

Business as usual for SPP in Mounbatten – Party's potential candidate revealed

On Wednesday evening (26 September), the Singapore People’s Party (“SPP”) were seen…

29 smokers at Yew Tee and Jurong Point, caught with duty-unpaid cigarettes

29 smokers were caught with duty-unpaid cigarettes during operation in the vicinity of Yew…

新加坡人被困固有社会阶层,动弹不得?

“大部分新加坡人为自己的社会阶级感到困惑,甚至有种被困在自己的阶层中的感觉,无法提升。” 《南华早报》以《如果新加坡那么富有,为何她的公民感到困顿?》为题,报导新加坡国立大学政策研究院(IPS)近日释出的调查报告。 该调查发现,10名受访者中,逾五名受访者表示对未来的财务流动性相当勉强,不到十分之一的人则认为自己的财富会下降。仅44巴仙的人认为在10年内财富会提升。 然而,根据不同教育程度的受访者显示,在中学以下的学历的受访者,只有23.8巴仙的人会预计未来更好,而10.6巴仙的人则认为未来情况会更加糟糕。 《南华早报》日前也曾作相关民调,发现在五名新加坡人中,有四人认为他们的悲观情绪是来自于工资与生活成本的不相符,以及工资停滞不前的现象。 这份报告《新加坡的断层:公众对个人现实感、管理以及未来的讨论》,邀请4015名年满18岁以上的人进行调查。從去年8月至今年1月进行一项民调,探讨可能影响本地社会凝聚力的隐忧。 根据公共政策院官网,有关研究报告的简介,指出近期发生的一些社会事件,都与五大关键议题有关:族群、宗教、移民、阶级和性少数权益(LGBT)。 “无法预估十年后情况” 一名未完成中学学历的受访者何先生表示,在电动滑板车禁令还未开始前,每月依靠送餐员的工作为他赚取2000至3000块的收入;但在禁令开始后,他可能需要考虑考取摩托车驾照,购买新的摩托车才能赖以为生,但他还需要承担抚养妻儿,并且明年可能需要购买三房式组屋,因此这样的改变让生活变得更拮据。 “我真的无法预估十年后的事情,你就算问我两年后的计划,我也只能说我真的不知道如何生存”。他表示,“这里是一个相当富裕的国家,只可惜它的进展太快了,并不是所有人都能够跟得上脚步。” 类似的案例,也发生在不同的教育程度的受访者上。一名仅24岁的杂志撰稿员,在每月收入3000块下,还需要偿还学贷。他表示,他想要对未来保持希望,无奈生活成本过高让她觉得生活停滞不前。 除了要和自己人竞争,还需面对外来者的涌入…