Leong Sze Hian / Senior Writer

I refer to the article “Tharman: Pay rises no cure for inflation” (ST, Jul 10).

It states that “Singapore must guard against a second round of inflation, which could happen if wages are raised to keep pace with price increases”.

Employers have been urged by the National Wages Council to make one-off lump sum payments to tide their workers through this period of economic difficulty.

Civil servants were paid an extra bonus recently to help them cope with inflation.

The private sector is also being encouraged now to pay an extra month’s bonus to help their employees.

So, what should employers do now?

Pay the extra month’s bonus, but don’t increase wages?

Or, increase wages, but don’t pay the bonus?

Don’t either of these amount to increasing wages?

I am confused.

Wouldn’t raising wages which spread over 12 months have a more graduated effect on wage inflation, compared to a larger lump sum bonus?

Meanwhile, the following have increased since inflation started to rise last year, in chronological order:-

Petrol, nets fees, service & conservancy charges late payment fees, hospital fees, cable TV, food, electricity, building development charge, HDB rental, ERP, bus fares, special needs school fees, medical insurance for foreign workers, taxi fares, school bus fees, S & CC (Potong Pasir), HDB valuation fees, MediShield premiums/deductibles, ElderShield premiums, cinema tickets, university fees, malls car parking, cost of cashcard, PCF kindergarten fees, etc.

Since inflation for the last 13 months was 7.7 per cent (May’s year-on-year of 7.5 plus the 0.2 per cent increase over April 2008), and the the average annualised wage change was 1.66 per cent for workers, from 1997 to 2007 (using Ministry of Manpower data from its Wages Report), how do we cope with the rising cost of living in the meantime?

I wrote an article about free things in Singapore, and many Singaporeans are contributing to the directory of free stuff at www.theonlinecitizen.com

In the meantime, here are 16 suggestions for the Government to further help singaporeans during this time

1. <!–[endif]–>Reduce the 30 per cent water conservation tax.

2. <!–[endif]–>Reduce the 41 cents per litre tax on petrol.

3. <!–[endif]–>Exempt essential items from GST.

4. <!–[endif]–>Increase tax reliefs to account for rising inflation and increased cost-of-living. For example, the $ 2,000 wife’s relief, parent’s relief, etc, have not changed for many years.

5. <!–[endif]–>Raise interest rates to dampen rising inflation.

6. <!–[endif]–>Freeze the profits of transport and utility companies, such that any increase in profits over the last year, should be returned to consumers like a subsidy, as most of these companies have been making ever increasing record profits, almost year after year.

7. Reverse the increase in property tax on all HDB flats implemented on 1 January 2008.

8. <!–[endif]–>Rescind the increase in rentals for 1 and 2-room HDB flats.

9. <!–[endif]–>Freeze or reduce all healthcare fees increases (these are not included in the freeze on Government fees).

10. <!–[endif]–>Freeze or reduce all university fees increases (these are also not included as explained above).

11. <!–[endif]–>Reverse the 31 December 2007 salary increase for Ministers and withdraw the planned third increase in Ministerial pay scheduled for 31 December 2008.

12. <!–[endif]–>As the Town Councils already have accumulated more than a billion dollars of surpluses in their sinking funds, implement a temporary reduction in Service and Conservancy Charges (S & CC).

13. <!–[endif]–>Instead of giving tax credits, like the children’s tax credits of up to

<!–[if !supportLists]–>14. <!–[endif]–>$ 70,000 for 4 children, which more than 60 per cent of Singaporeans do not benefit, because they hardly pay any income tax change this system which focuses on tax credits to focus on tax reliefs or direct cash subsidies, so that more lower and middle-income Singaporeans can benefit.

15. <!–[endif]–>Reverse the increase in MediShield premiums/deductibles and ElderShield premiums.

16. <!–[endif]–>Reverse the increase in PCF kindergarten fees.

17. <!–[endif]–>Reverse the increase in building development charge.

As the Budget surplus was $ 6.4 billion, the implementation of some of the above suggestions, may have a minimal impact, from the perspective of fiscal prudence.

—————-

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Singapore ranked fourth in world for country with most travel freedom

Singapore has ranked the fourth country in the world with the most travel…

患红斑狼疮申请早领公积金遭拒 妇女致函新加坡总统求助

“我希望您能认真酌量我的申请。除非已走投无路,我无意自杀。这是残酷的世界。” 一名单亲妈妈在上月15日,写信给新加坡总统哈莉玛求助,申诉自己患有红斑狼疮,自2016年起就一直待业。她想申请提早领出公积金过活和养活家人,遗憾的是被当局拒绝。 2011年,蔡莉莉(译音)被诊断患有系统性红斑狼疮(Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, SLE),致使她出现全身疼痛、嗜睡等症状,同时对光过敏和时有出现“脑雾”(指难以形成清晰思维和记忆)现象,这些情况都致使他难以重返工作职场。再者基于经济拮据,她不得不停止治疗。 现年45岁的蔡莉莉,自从2016年6月起就因为健康问题,处在待业状态,她相信因为她的病况和年龄,致使他迄今所有工作申请都石沉大海。 事主曾是南洋女子高中和国家初级学院学生,目前22岁的女儿就读新加坡理工学院,成绩优异;事主75岁的父亲则不幸患癌和心脏衰竭,只能依靠每月仅472元入息的公积金积蓄过活,因此事主还要负起照顾父亲的责任。 财务压力曾企图自杀 她在信中坦言,自己因为病情和财务压力,陷入忧郁和有自杀倾向。甚至曾为了能领出公积金和保险来养活家人,事主企图自杀,所幸被送入邱德拔医院急诊处急救。 事主表示,在2018年曾前往教育部长王乙康的选区会见人民活动,希望透过后者协助申请早领公积金,来支付自己约900元的房贷,不过被公积金局拒绝。 再者,基于自己积蓄所剩无几,且必须向亲友举债过活,故此要求公积金局让他领出自己的保健储蓄和特别户头。 她在信中也表示打算向建屋局申请租赁组屋,并卖掉现有的组屋藉此摆脱房贷负担。…

涉卷款3300万元 王赐安控状再添四项

涉嫌卷走3300万元的JLC律师事务所管理合伙人王赐安(Jeffrey Ong)如今再加控四项罪状,包括伪造文件与失信罪。 此前,王赐安面临26项指控。据最新指控指出,王赐安于2017年10月私吞律师事务所银行户口里的664万元,还伪造银行证明,让其客户陈一章误以为有关钱财仍在户头内,但指控并没有说明客户身份。 控方表示,案件仍在侦办中,被告可能还会面临更多的控状。 王赐安原是律师事务所JLC Advisor的执行合伙人,日前警方曾援引刑事法典第420条,指他涉嫌欺骗CCJ Investment Limited投资公司的600万元。 据本社日前报导,精密工程公司艾来得科技(Allied Technologies)在发现其交予JLC Advisor托管的3300万元不翼而飞,随而向商务局投报。王赐安也在此次事件后,随着款项失踪了。 今年6月,商务局协同马国警方在吉隆坡将王赐安逮捕归案,据悉,他当时使用被盗的马国护照过关逃到马来西亚,而且已经将手机处理了,并居住在无需透过信用卡付费的地方。…

总理坚称有竞争力部长薪酬 有助抵御贪腐问题

本月28日,我国总理李显龙透过视讯参加华盛顿智库大西洋理事会(Atlantic Council)举办的座谈会。 席间 ,主持人、凯雷投资集团联席执行董事长鲁宾斯坦(David Rubenstein)询问李显龙,为何新加坡部长的薪资,比起美国政务者相对来得高? 对此李显龙辩称,有竞争力的部长薪酬,乃是协助我国抵御贪腐问题的要素之一。 尽管这种“高薪养廉”做法仍有争议,不过李显龙强调这“适用于新加坡的体制”,“最好根据人的价值和贡献来支薪。” 他声称如果不这么做,反而会影响到公共服务的价值,或者人们会找办法从其他地方“得到补偿”、获取隐藏式的报酬等。 “或者出现“旋转门现象(revolving door,意指官员退休后转入企业、机构就职)”,你能够在离开(政坛)、退休后拿到某样东西,这回造成更大的问题。” 他表示过去新加坡都会遇到这类的官员,尽管他们都位居高职,但仍抵不住诱惑。政府也必须果断对他们采取行动,即便这类事件令人感到尴尬。