Tan Kin Lian / Senior Writer

The Ministry of Transport is introducing a new fare system for public transport that is based on distance rather than the number of transfers. This will reduce one obstacle in the use of public transport, namely the high cost when several transfers are involved.

I hope that the change in system does not cost a large sum of money, as this will eventually be borne by the commuters through higher fares.

A simpler way is to increase the current rebate on transfers. This does not require a massive change to the fare computation system that needs to be installed on all the buses and train stations.

Feeder service

For a long time, commuters have complained about the long waiting time and the long traveling time to get a feeder bus to the train station.

Actually, feeder services are operated in only a few towns in Singapore. A large bus is used to operate this service. It has to take a winding route covering many streets in the town, to pick up sufficient passengers to collect enough fares to pay the operating expenses – leading to long traveling time.

For most parts of Singapore, there is no feeder service. The commuter has to take a bus service that happens to pass through the train station and the destination. This is usually a service that is intended to serve a larger part of Singapore. As this is a specialized service, it has a long waiting time of 7 to 15 minutes, depending on the time of day. If the bus does not keep to the schedule, the waiting time is longer.

If the bus is crowded, the commuter has to wait for the next bus, adding to the waiting time.

Mini-buses

A better system is to use mini-buses that serve an area of 1 or 2 km around a train station and bus interchange. There can be several services to serve different parts of this area, to reduce the traveling time. As the capacity of the mini-bus is small, there is no need for the mini-bus to make many stops to pick up sufficient passengers. This will reduce the traveling time.

With more mini-buses serving the commuters, the waiting time will also be reduced considerably. An accepted waiting time for a feeder service should be 3 to 5 minutes.

Many Singaporeans long for the old days, when “pirate taxis” offer a convenient low cost service in the rural parts of Singapore. These vehicles pick up and drop passengers anyway along a designated route. It is our “old day” version of the feeder service that I am now proposing.

Hong Kong

This service has been successfully operated in Hong Kong and other cities. A Singaporean friend sent this e-mail to me.

Hi Uncle Tan. I have just read your article on improving the Singapore transport system. I have been living in Hong Kong for almost 4 years and noticed that a few of your recommendations are actually live examples here, for e.g. the minibuses, trams and express buses….

I must say that the Hong Kong transport system is very good. Of the two offices I used to work in, scheduled buses brought me to work with door-to-door convenience… minibuses gave me short traveling time at a fraction of what a taxi ride would cost.

And the express buses are great…. not to mention the cheap trams (at less than SG 40 cents) which give you the ease of hoping on and off along the main arteries in Central….

And there is one more thing that I should add… something that was not in your article…. condominiums here have their own shuttle bus services… they are affordable and provide express transport for residents who live further away from the main centre of activity such as Central.

My baby is one year old and I decided to move to Lantau for its open spaces and greenery… the distance is long… (i am almost at the HK airport) …but the shuttle bus brings me to work within 45 minutes … when i was living in Mid-levels… it was even better… no more than 30 minutes… and if its winter… i could even use the escalator…which is free!

Express bus

I wish now to talk about the express bus service that I have proposed. An express service makes only a few stops along the journey. This will reduce the traveling time considerably. The express bus does not have to make many stops to pick up individual passengers, as this function can be left to the feeder service.

When I was in New York twenty years ago, I learned that there are express trains that stop every 3 to 5 stations and local trains that stop at every station. This reduces the traveling time for people taking the express train. A commuter can take the express train for most of the journey and switch to a local train for the final leg. As the transfer is made on the same platform, it is quite convenient for the commuters.

Some of the express bus services can operate on the same routes as the train to offer an alternative to the commuters. This will increase competition and spur the train operator to improve its customer service, such as providing more frequent trains and avoid over-crowding. They can serve as a backup to the train service in the event of a breakdown or accident involving the train.

Other express services can connect the towns directly and offer a shorter traveling distance for the commuters.

Transfers

It is important that the transfer should be made at the same platform or involves a short walking distance. The feeder bus should bring commuters directly to the train station or to the boarding point of the feeder bus.

I hope that these suggestions, which are simple and relatively inexpensive to implement, can improve the public transport in Singapore considerably.

—————-

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

MOH: 1 in 4 patients with acute respiratory infection declined swab tests for COVID-19 due to fear of discomfort

Since 1 July, the Ministry of Health (MOH) announced that all patients…

Mediacorp always invites SDP at the last minute for political debates, says party member Bryan Lim

Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) member Bryan Lim Boon Heng said that invitations…

狮城新西兰升级版经济伙伴协议 后天生效

《新加坡与新西兰密切经济伙伴协议》(ANZSCEP)的升级协议,将在后天(2020年1月1日)生效。 贸工部长陈振声指出,上述协议迅速批准和生效,意味着两国对维护开放且依循规章贸易体制的承诺。他相信这有助于减少贸易壁垒,增加监管合作和电子商务方面的努力,让两国企业受益。“我期待加深两国经济关系。” 新加坡和新西兰是在2001年签署ANZSCEP,也是我国签署的第一份双边自贸协定(FTA)。我国出口新西兰关税取消,也依据出口商申报商品提供关税优惠,保障市场通行和两国投资者。 两国自2017年6月起,针对升级ANZSCEP协定进行谈判;最终在今年5月17日,新西兰总理阿尔登(Jacinda Ardern)到访我国并签署上述升级协议。 新加坡和新西兰都是拟议中的跨太平洋伙伴关系(TTP)12国之一,自美国总统川普推出TPP后,便促成跨太平洋全面进步协定。 狮城新西兰经济和国防关系 两国双边贸易关系在2018年同比增长12.1巴仙,增至410亿新元。 根据新西兰官方数据,我国也是新西兰的第六大投资国,截至2017年底投资额约为39亿新元。 此外,两国也透过东盟国防部长扩大会议(ADMM-Plus)和五国联防协议( Five-Power Defence Arrangements)等平台展现紧密的国防合作关系。自1997年,我国武装部队都会到新西兰怀乌鲁(Waiouru)进行实弹演习。

媒体人访谈揭新闻审查确实存在(附完整视频)

本社前日在脸书专页上载了一段主流媒体人在一场研讨会上的谈话剪接视频,揭示本地新闻界同仁新闻价值观和他们面对的新闻审查。对此,有读者要求本社上载完整视频,读者可点开以下的脸书链接,观赏完整现场录影。 有关访谈片段是录制于2016年,主题为《所有关于你想知道、却不敢问的电视与媒体业界情况》对话会上。 对话会由新加坡科技设计大学(SUTD)人文学院讲师罗林(James Rowlins)主持,邀请《亚洲新闻台》“Talking Point”主持人暨编辑Steven Chia、“局内人”数码团队制作人蓝淑珊(译音),以及高级制作人罗敏敏(译音),和学生听众分享在媒体业界的经验。 完整视频时间全长40余分钟,有兴趣者可点开脸书链接观赏,本文也节录与原先剪接视频相关的访谈的内容。 除了聆听受访媒体人分享新闻制作经验,讲师罗林抛出尖锐问题,指出新加坡有严重的新闻审查现象,新闻自由全球排名仅154,还落后于印尼和马国,询问在新加坡的媒体,是否有自我审查的现象? “媒体不扮演监督角色” 对此,Steven Chia在回答时表示,新加坡做的一套都有原因,媒体并不肩负“看门狗”(监督)政治领袖和政府的角色。 “我们有做政治宣传吗?有的!政治宣传也不是贬义词,政治宣传就是让民众知道发生了什么。很多时候我们也协助政府传达信息。”…