The following was sent to TOC by Mr Alton Tan. It is a reply to PAP MP, Dr Lam Pin Min, on the P65 blog. TOC thanks Mr Tan for allowing us to re-publish it here.

Dear Dr Lam,

I refer to the article, “New formula for public transport fare revision to be out this week” (The Straits Times, 1 July 2008).

More ERP gantries, higher ERP charges. Taxi surcharges have gone up, and taxi companies may be implementing a fuel charge soon. The latest news? Fares on public transport will be increased. I sometimes really wonder how “public” is Singapore’s public transportation system. They are private companies with management who only focus on profits, profits, and more profits.

Let me quote you an example. A few years ago when the North East line (NEL) was officially opened, several bus services going towards the city were terminated from my area. These services were basically from the Serangoon and Hougang depots (e.g. 111, 106, 501, 502 etc), reason being it wasn’t profitable to run these bus services along the same route as the NEL. Why? The NEL is owned by SBS Transit.

But removing these services adversely affected those people who do not live near a NEL station. Travelling to Shenton Way or Orchard Road used to be just a 15-25 minute ride away from my house (I live along Boundary Road/Ang Mo Kio Ave 1) with express bus services 501/502. Now, it takes me 45-60 minutes to hop on a bus and switch to a train to get to town. Would you now rather drive or take a bus? If 501/502 were still serving the Boundary Road stretch, I would gladly take them. It would only be a 20 minute ride along the expressway.

I have a simple question to ask: wouldn’t these bus services ease the heavy crowds on trains and other bus services if they were reinstated?

Is the Public Transport Council trying to improve the public transportation system, or is it thinking of profits for the public transport companies only?

With the inflation rate at an all-time high and still rising, raising public transport fares now will be a big blow to low/middle income families. Will the Government only finally step in when low/middle income citizens resort to bicycles as a form of transportation and public transport becomes nothing but a luxury for the poor? Will cars, trains and buses be restricted to only the rich and higher income families? Maybe one day roads in Singapore will be for cars only and only one lane on the road will be allocated to citizens’ vehicles and public buses because only the elite can afford to drive.

I am writing this because I really feel for lower income families. I am currently working part time as I will be leaving to go overseas to further my studies soon. I currently only earn $1200/mth and after deducting CPF, I am left with $1000. After deducting my daily expenses and bills, I am left with $400. I really salute those low-income families who can raise a family with a pay similar to mine (and I am only supporting myself). I hope that in 2010 when I return to Singapore, I will not see more beggars on the street begging for money, or senior citizens stalking tables at hawker centres collecting empty drink cans or cardboard.

Regards,

A sad Singaporean

—————

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

欺骗分时度假会员取消配套可领回资金 法院判男子四年两周监禁

一名男子因涉嫌欺骗分时度假会员,取消配套可领回资金,被法院判处四年两周的监禁。 警方昨日(3日)发出文告,42岁的亚新(译名)涉嫌诱骗分时度假会员在终止会籍后,只要支付一定费用,便可索回资金。 据警方表示,他透过Solution One私人有限公司作为实施诡计的媒介,并且招募训练员工招揽客户。 “在2013年8月至2015年9月期间,已有47名分时会员接受这项服务”,警方表示。 实际上,亚新知道Solution One私人有限公司并没有这项服务,最终受害者支付94万2141新元后,却没有得到如预期的结果。 2018年6月28日,亚新被控欺诈营商(Fraudulent Trading),违反了公司法第340条。另一名与亚新共同经营Solution One私人有限公司的罪犯,亦被控相同罪名。 警方指出,目前两起诉讼仍在进行中。 另一方面,亚新在2015年的1月至7月期间,透过Allied…

直指我国部长和高级公务员 林鼎:年薪高得离谱!

人民之声党领袖林鼎昨日(7月29日)在脸书上发帖,对我国执政者和高级公务员领取高薪一事表示不满。 他指出,人民之声是唯一要求把总理薪金降低多达70巴仙的政党,并要求政治职位和高级公务员,必须进行相应的调整。 他提醒民众公务员的职责所在,“这是为民众服务。我不清楚他们是否还是用公务员(public servants)一词,但是在以前,一名公务员(civil servant)也是公仆。” “可笑的是,我们许多政治职务持有者和高级公务员的年薪都超过100万元(李显龙年薪就有220万元)。但是,这和大部分民众每日辛劳所赚取的薪资相比,简直就差天差地。而我们政治职务持有者表示,他们的薪水应该和社会上的精英,如顶尖的总裁、高新律师和医生挂钩。” 对此,他表示,这些公务员的薪水简直就是“荒谬”。 以英国美国领导者为例 除了总理和部长都获得高薪之外,林鼎也提醒,新加坡市长的年薪为66万元,国会议员的薪资为20万元,合计每年至少能获得86万元。“在我们这个小国内,就有五个(市长兼国会议员)!伦敦的地方面积是我国的两倍以上,人口也多达900万人,但是市长只有一位。” “以目前约1.38新元兑换1美元的汇率来说,市长的薪水等于47万1000美元,而国会议员兼市长的薪酬为62万3188美元。” 他之后也以美国总统为例,美国总统年薪为40万美元,虽然住在白宫,但是总统也要缴付白宫厨房的高昂费用。 此外,英国国会议员的基本薪金为8万1932英镑(约14万5905新元),但是,林鼎表示,该国总理、部长和包括反对党领袖及其他高级反对党领袖在内的公务员们,都会获得薪金补贴。…

The jury is out on whether hawkers will survive post-COVID-19, says Makansutra founder KF Seetoh

The current Phase 2 heightened alert that Singapore is on is “worse…

Benjamin Lim's family calls for new scheme to be extended to every case of minors and not up to police's discretion

Benjamin Lim’s family calls for the new scheme to ensure young suspects…