This website is about your voice, not ours. It would be ironic to talk about human rights and democracy without highlighting your involvement in shaping the discussion.

This week, we will be publishing two full pieces consisting exclusively of a collation of comments YOU have made on TOC’s human rights contributions. In the course of the commentary on these pieces, content has developed that warrants greater exposure and discussion.

This is the primary criteria for selecting the comments that appear in our new innovation, Your Voice: the ability to provoke deeper thought.

The beginning of Your Voice underscores the advantage of new media over the old. The internet is unique in its ability to generate organic intellectual discussion, and is a good microcosm of healthy participative democracies. You, our readers, have proven this by taking the debate to ever higher levels.

Our only input in this process is the selection of comments, as well as editing them for brevity. Ellipses have been used where comments have had to be cut short for length, but we have done so in a way that preserves the original intent of the comment.

In the spirit of free speech and democratic dialogue, keep the comments coming!

Choo Zheng Xi

Editor-in-Chief

TOC

————–

Your Voice

Your ideas and opinions generated on the issues raised in the article: Citizen Woon

14 June 2008

Solo Bear on June 14th, 2008 1.45 pm

Woon has been living overseas many years. We are all just armchair critics. He knows the global scene better than anyone of us.

To the rest who are “supporters” of Human Rights,

One of the statements issued by Human Rights Groups is the fair and equal treatment and opportunities for immigrants. Any takers out there to support the government’s call to support and promote immigrant workforce in Singapore?

Thought so. There’s Woon’s point on “the selective process” of Human Rights supporters.

Silencer on June 14th, 2008 8.01 am

Human rights is indeed often misused as a tool by extremists and other dissidents. However, to extinguish all notion of discussion about human rights because of this is to operate on a patient with an axe; there are merits to the discussion, and one with the people’s mandate such as the Government should take it upon itself as its duty to listen and reflect on the voices of its people.

Inconsistencies are replicated all over the world, in every imaginable subject of contention; this also does not translate into a reason to discourage discussion.

Alan Wong on June 14th, 2008 10.11 am

At the very least, I think every Singaporean citizen should
have the very basic freedom to question the integrity of
our Ministers on account of public opinion and concern.

Daniel on June 14th, 2008 1.49 pm

Solo Bear:
“However, Woon’s words must be seen in the global context. That’s because Human Rights is about global issues and not just
Singapore’s.”

I agree with what you say about human right in global perspective. However Woon’s word are not likely to direct at global perspective but locally. The coincidence at which he put this remark clear indicate that it is used to explain for Dr Chee’s action. It will be appropiate not to even comment about worldwide issues now when we ourselves didn’t even experience what is meant as human right locally. Woon’s word comes a time when the government need to justify their action again Dr Chee, and it comes in handy using a bootlicker just like Chua sister. If they really worry about global perspective then he should ought to talk human before the Dr Chee’s case, not in the midst.

We should be astute to detect such intention of Woon. If he really talk about global human right, he should have EQ to keep his mouth shut and not let his IQ to do than raking now. So he either he lack EQ or he direct his remark at Dr Chee.

Claire C on June 14th, 2008 6.35 pm

Common Singaporean: Wants no more than stable shelter, food, income

Youth of today: Wants more than just Gucci, Rebok, Zara Sushi, Korean Food, French Food. They want the world’s best underwear to cover themselves. Thinking of Human Rights? The right to have branded goods.

BlackSheep on June 14th, 2008 8.46 pm

Shanmugam and Woon were recently appointed Law Minister and AG respectively. Both have made some controversial statements. I take it as a way of announcing their presence to the general public.

Freedom of Assembly is not going to happen with this gov’t and its paranoia. Not for a long while. Permit given only during elections.

The focus should be on Freedom of Expression before we think about Freedom of Assemby. We are already expressing ourselves in TOC but there is a need to know the level of participation , the numbers, especially those who will be eligible to vote in 2011. I think TOC has to come up with some kind of mass marketing strategy to reach out to the public.

Dr Syed Alwi on June 14th, 2008 11.58 pm

Dear People,

There ARE conflicts and contradictions between Islamic Law and Universal Declaration of Human Rights as discussed in the article in the link below :

http://www.iheu.org/node/2949

In this sense – Walter Woon has a point. I can accept some small – very small – loosening of Human Rights in a multi-cultural setting.

BUT and its a big but –

We cannot take cultural relativism too far. Otherwise one can justify the Myanmar junta’s actions during the cyclone Nargis aftermath as being part and parcel of Myanmar’s political culture !

Look – the only guarantee we have against tyranny, corruption and oppression IS Human Rights and Democracy !

If you give up your rights – then how will you defend yourself against tyranny ?

Walter Woon better have a good answer to that question……………..

Anonymous on June 14th, 2008 11.49 pm

As Voltaire had declared, “I may not agree with what you have to say but i will defend your right to say it”

Chris Patten stated, “In a democracy everybody has a right to be represented, including the jerks.”

Because in a democracy, dissidence is tolerated. Rights activists are also fighting for the rights of even those who disagree with them.

In an autocracy, they have the real fanatics there: They don’t disagree/argue/reason with you, they just simply give their opponents a bullet to save all that trouble.

————–

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

海盗乘舢板 五小时内两度劫驳船

一艘拖着驳船的拖船,五个小时内竟两度在新加坡海峡遇上海盗,海盗打驳船主意,将一些废金属劫走,所幸过程中无人受伤。 本月18日早上11点29分左右,拖船Kim Hock Tug 9,正从新加坡前往越南航行,而在经过新加坡海峡航行分到通航(Traffic Separation Scheme)的东向行驶时,碰上七名海盗。 当海盗看见另一艘驳船向他们靠近时,立即乘上两、三艘舢板逃离现场,随后拖船船长也向交通资讯系统(Vessel Traffic Information System)通报。 不料在五小时后,约下午3点51分左右,七名海盗又再次上了同一艘驳船,而新加坡警察海岸卫队(Police…

Open letter to NMP Kuik Shiao-Yin

Below is an open letter by a member of the public, Ms…

我国人才辈出 何以执着外籍专才?

政府推出新计划以引进更多外籍专才,进入到我国各个领域中,而且未明言限制人数,不过网民不仅纳闷,我国明明拥有着闻名全球的教育体系,难道至今仍然无法栽培出自己的专才吗?而且一些领域外籍专才的最低薪金,也只比毕业生的中位数工资高出100元,不是让毕业生更难寻得好工作? 政府与上周二(7月30日)开始通过新加坡经济发展局(EDB)和企业发展局(ESG)宣布,希望成为我国科技企业的“核心团队成员”的专业人士、经理、执行人员和技师(PMETs),或许在申请工作准证(EP)时可以更具伸缩性。 上述单位也表示他们将帮助“推动”外国PMETs更容易进入我国,成为在我国运营的科技企业的“核心团队”。 而两天后,贸工部长陈振声于周四(8月1日)忽然告诉彭博社,除了技术驱动领域,吸引外籍人才我国的两年计划或会扩展到其他领域。换句话说,这个特殊计划将“促进”外籍PMETs,在我国各行业取得工作准证。 陈振声虽然没有实际指出相关的领域,但是他表示已经准备好将计划推广到其他领域。他表示,我国从未限制外籍顶尖人才的参与,且他们不是和本地普通国人竞争,而是为我国竞争。 这让许多网民不仅质疑我国堪称世界最顶尖的教育体系,究竟出现了什么问题,难道我国无法培养自己的专才,政府还需要不断引进外国人才? 我国教育获得国际认可 事实上,据BBC 2016年报告指出,在国际学生评估(PISA)排行榜中,我国学生取得最高成绩,在数学、阅读和科学考试中名列前茅。下一届的PISA结果将于今年12月公布。 由经济合作与发展组织(OECD)筹划的PISA排名非常具有影响力,排名结果是基于70多个国家的15岁学生测试成绩。每三年一次的PISA测试,对政治家的影响逐渐增加,因为他们的国家和政策都是根据全球学校排名来衡量的。 该组织教育主任安德里亚施莱西尔(Andreas Schleicher)称赞我国不仅表现良好,而且遥遥领先。我国在PISA的所有测试科目中取得第一,领先亚洲、欧洲、澳大利亚、北美洲和南美洲的学校体系。…

TikTok’s Rise: What does it mean for Facebook and Snapchat?

by ValueChampion TikTok’s viral growth has been superbly impressive. But what does its…