Andrew Loh

A recent public forum about youth concerns raised the issue of lowering the voting age to 18.

———

Perhaps a post-1965 Member of Parliament might initiate the debate to enfranchise these trustees of our posterity.

Andy Ho, Senior Writer, Straits Times, May 8, 2008, “If old enough for NS, why not the vote?”

The above are quotes from Ho’s article. The first one is the very first line of his piece, and the second one the very last sentence from it.

The “recent public forum” Ho was alluding to, I suppose, was the Youthquake forum held at the Workers’ Party (WP) headquarters on May 4, 2008. It was organised by the WP’s Youth Wing (YW) and in particular Bernard Chen, the YW’s Organising Secretary. (TOC reported on the event here.)

(I do not know of any other “recent public forum” which addressed the issue of the voting age.)

The forum’s title was, “Should Singaporean Youths be Allowed to Vote at 18?”

I think as a journalist – and a senior writer at that – Ho should have given due recognition to the organizers of the forum and not just allude to it. In fact, Ho avoided mentioning the WP altogether. This wouldn’t be so bad if not for the last sentence of that piece – Ho called on “a post-1965 Member in Parliament” to “initiate” the debate on the issue. I would have thought that the youths at the forum had initiated the debate already!

And as we all know, the only “post-1965 Members of Parliament” (also called P65 MPs) are from the People’s Action Party (PAP).

One can only wonder why Ho did not instead urge the WP to “initiate” or further the call to lower the voting age and instead called on PAP MPs to do so. After all, the forum was organised by the WP and not the PAP. This is quite bewildering, to say the least.

While it is laudable that Ho made some good arguments in favour of Singaporeans being allowed to vote at 18, closer scrutiny of his article reveals virtually the same points which were highlighted by the young speakers at the forum, particularly by Khairulanwar.

Here, Ho again failed to mention that the young forum speakers had also brought up virtually all of the points he raised in his article.

For example:

Ho said:

Perhaps a post-1965 Member of Parliament might initiate the debate to enfranchise these trustees of our posterity.

National Serviceman Khairulanwar, in his speech at the forum, said:

This suggests that the government has an implicit trust in the NSFs (Full-time National Servicemen) to undertake such a critical responsibility; however a similar trust to enfranchise us into the electorate remains lacking.

Today, May 9, the Youth Wing of the WP responded to Ho’s article. On its website, the YW says:

We agree with the arguments raised in Mr. Ho’s editorial, since virtually all of these arguments were raised by the speakers at the above event and duly recorded by Mediacorp, and urge that this matter be debated in Parliament regardless of partisan standing.

We stand united for the betterment of the nation.

Yes, we should all move on and address the issue of lowering the voting age in Singapore to 18 which, by the way, is the age most countries have legally adopted as the age of majority.

Nonetheless, one would expect senior writers in a national newspaper to not be shy from giving credit where credit is due, especially when it is something which is being fronted and organised by the youths of Singapore – even if they are from or invited by opposition parties.

Give credit where credit is due, Andy. (Though you may not have been there at the forum, as far as I know.)

And while you’re at it, do applaud the youths for speaking out too.

—————-

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

新型冠状病毒累积80宗死亡病例 一官员抢救无效逝世

据中国卫生应急办公室官网资讯,截至本月27日凌晨12时,中国国家卫生健康委会共收到30省累积确诊病例2744宗,重症病例461例,累积死亡病例80例。 累积治愈出院有51例以及疑似病例多达5794例。至于已知香港确诊病例多达八例,澳门五例例以及台湾地区四例。 新加坡迄今为止确诊的病例多达四宗,邻国马来西亚四宗、泰国七例、日本三例、韩国三例,美国三例,越南二例,尼泊尔一例,法国三例,澳大利亚四例。 此外,在武汉新增死亡病例中,亦包括一位武汉市民宗委原主任王献良。他在本月26日下午,抢救无效在武汉市中心医院(北区)去世。 王献良今年62岁,湖北监利人,曾任武汉市民政局副局长。2012年,王献良被任命为武汉市民宗委主任。此后五年间他一直担任该职。 北京新增5起武汉肺炎确诊病例,其中包含一名9个月大女婴,成为北京最小的年龄最小确诊病例。

Radicality – The Singaporean Youth?

  By Eddie Choo Monday, 11 December, 2006 Numbers may be an…

NTU student debunks fabricated news about himself, condemns how SPH publishes unconsented news

As the saga of Singapore Press Holdings (SPH) and an NTU student…

POFMA has been gazetted – it is now the law of the land

The Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) is officially in…