Tan Kin Lian

Many people buy life insurance to provide financial security to their family. If premature death occurs, the policy provides a cash sum to take care of the future financial needs of the family.

Insurance agents are drilled into thinking that they play a “noble” role in safeguarding the future of many families. This is half the truth.

Here is the other half: Many families are being grossly overcharged for the modest financial protection offered by the life insurance policy. After deducting the high expenses, their net savings do not earn a sufficient yield for them to live on during their retirement.

Let me quote a real example. Take the case of a male at age 30 saving $300 a month over 30 years. He is able to secure a sum assured of $100,000 under an endowment policy.

If premature death does not occur (and this represents probability of 95%), he is likely to receive a maturity sum of say $171,000, representing a yield of 3% per annum on his savings over 30 years. The insurance agent says that this looks like a good deal, considering that his family had enjoyed financial security for 30 years.

If the policyholder had invested the same sum of money in a low-cost investment fund that mirrors the investments of the life insurance company, he is likely to earn a net yield of about 5% per annum. At the end of 30 years, this will give an accumulated amount of $239,000.

This investment fund earns $68,000, or 40% more than the proceeds of the insurance policy. This is reflected as the “effect of deduction” in the benefit illustration given to the consumer at the point of sale of the life insurance policy. Most people are not aware about the existence of this figure, let alone understand what it means.

The effect of deduction of $68,000 represents a “reduction in yield” of 2% per annum, i.e. the difference between the net yield of 3% and the gross yield of 5%.

The insurance agent will probably explain that this is the cost of the valuable benefit provided by the policy, namely, the financial security provided to the family for 30 years.

What the agent did not say, which is probably dishonest, is that the policyholder could have bought the same financial security to the family through a decreasing term insurance policy for only one-tenth of the cost, or about $7,000. The low cost term insurance, which is what the agent does not offer to the policyholder, will allow the policyholder to earn $61,000 more over the 30 years.

The remainder of the “effect of deduction” goes to pay for the agent’s commission, the overriding commission to the agency managers, the advertising expenses, the sales incentive trips, the overhead expenses of the insurance company, and the profits for their shareholders.

If the policyholder buys a whole-life policy or a critical illness policy, the “effect of deduction” is higher than that for an endowment policy. Although the coverage is higher and wider, the total cost is still about ten times of the cost of a comparable term insurance plan.

The investment-linked policy is equally bad for the policyholder. I have seen benefit illustrations for these policies where the reduction in yield is 4% or more. If a reduction in yield of 2% amounts to $68,000, a reduction in yield of 4% will more than double the cost. This is taking too much from the unsuspecting consumer. It amounts to daylight robbery.

Here is my advice:

1. Do not buy any high-cost life insurance policy. High-cost life insurance plans are those where the policy combines life insurance protection with savings. Low-cost life insurance policies – term insurance policies – cover protection only.

Examples of high-cost life insurance policies include whole life, endowment, critical illness, education and investment-linked policies, where many months of your premium are used to pay the insurance agent’s commission.

2. If a policy is recommended to you, you should ask about the “effect of deduction” and the “reduction in yield”. If the insurance agent is not able to show these figures, you should stop the discussion as the agent is incompetent or dishonest. Ask the agent to disclose the total amount of commission payable over the first three years of the policy. Remember, the commission comes entirely from your premiums.

3. Find out about the cost of decreasing term insurance to provide the same coverage. Do not ask the same agent, as he or she is likely to quote you a large premium. Call the hotline of another insurance company. If they do not provide a decreasing term policy, you can buy a level term policy for a higher premium.

4. The coverage of $100,000 is probably inadequate for your family. You need to be covered for about five years of your earnings. Most people need $200,000 or $300,000. If you buy decreasing term insurance, you can afford to have higher coverage as the cost is low.

My history in NTUC Income

Some people will point out that during my tenure as chief executive of NTUC Income, I had offered the same life insurance policies that are now being discouraged in this article.

Here is the truth. The policies that were sold during my time have a cost to the policyholder that is less than half of similar products in the market. This is achieved by reducing the agent’s commission and the administrative, marketing and other expenses. These policies give a return on maturity which is 15% to 30% higher than similar products in the market.

This statement applies to the old policies introduced during my tenure. I do not wish to comment on the new policies introduced by NTUC Income after I have left. The consumer should ask about the “effect of deduction” and the “reduction in yield” on these new policies and make their judgement.

——————-

You May Also Like

Does Trade and Industry Minister Chan Chun Sing's latest statement support Taiwan govt’s claim on two ST Engineering production lines shipped back to S'pore?

In the wake of “many rumours and speculation” on Singapore’s mask production…

SDP calls for inquiry into 14-year-old Benjamin Lim's case

In a press release issued today by the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP),…

行动不便老人倒地不起 所幸志工及时发现求助

单身男子老来无所依,身有疾病而无法走动,住家内大小便都在同一地点,令人看了心酸。 本地慈善组织Hope In Meals于7月23日在脸书上帖文,分享了这名老人家的悲惨情况,且是在一名志愿者前往探望时揭发的。 该组织志工在发现了老人家时,他已经在喘着粗气倒在地上,志工急忙招来救护车,并通知她的同伴,一起帮助老人家。 这名老人家是该组织创立以来的受惠者之一,虽然健康状况欠佳,但仍保持友善和积极的态度。 虽然老人家独居,但需要有人不断提醒他吃药,而现在他在医院中获得了医疗护理,该组织对志工们的迅速反应表示感谢。 “只有通过和受惠者的日常互动,我们才能迅速找出需要医疗关注的人们。我们衷心感谢我们的职工们,每天透过送餐给Uncle并陪他喝茶,建立了融洽的关系,因此能容易就发现事情根源,并在情况恶化之前帮助Uncle。” 该组织表示,对于能够及时提供帮助表示庆幸。因为在某些情况下,有时受惠者的邻居过世了数天,都没有人发现。 组织也在帖文中指出基于组织的资金不足,呼吁民众给予支持和捐款,并会继续这个艰苦斗争。他们也欢迎更多志愿者加入,甚至分享他们的经验。

Indian nationals form largest number of imported cases into Singapore

It was earlier reported that India’s COVID-19 outbreak is now the world’s…