By zyberzitizen

The hanging of Nigerian Iwuchukwu Amara Tochi has, no doubt, thrown up many issues which we should be looking at. This article is not about the merits or demerits of Tochi’s hanging. Sadly, his hanging is already done and there is nothing we can do about it.

However, his death brings up many issues which I will address briefly here. Among them are:

1. Bloggers, and by extension perhaps singaporeans as a whole, do care. The debate on the blogosphere and forums has shown that Singaporeans (and bloggers, in particular) do care about non-bread and butter issues.

2. The mainstream media’s silence on the subject. Despite the active debate on the internet, our mainstream media seems to have ignored it. One can only wonder why they dedicated much publicity to the Wee Shu Min saga but not this one.

3. The lack of information on the subject. As have been pointed out by pro-death for Tochi posters, there is a lack of understanding of certain legal principles and terms by anti-death for Tochi posters. (This includes me).

As I have stated before, I am against the death penalty for drug trafficking. My reasons are:

1. The current system is too flawed to justify taking a man’s (or a woman’s) life. For example, early and immediate access to lawyers for the accused at the point of detention is left to the prosecutors or the police and not firmly and unequivocally stated down in law.

2. Mistakes in judgement can never be adequately reversed.

3. Deterrence, which is cited as the main (or one of the main) reasons for implementing the death sentence, is not and has not been conclusively proved to be effective or that the death penalty is mainly responsible for the relatively low number of cases of trafficking in Singapore. Indeed, if the death penalty deters would-be traffickers from trafficking, perhaps we should also introduce the death penalty for cigarette smugglers (which according to yesterday’s news report has jumped some 46% in 2006), alcohol abusers who drink and drive, child molesters, and so on – crimes which we would want to eradicate from our society.

4. Many countries in the world, including ‘first-world’ countries which Singapore claims to be, have abolished the death penalty.

5. There is no concrete, detailed and exhaustive independent study on Singapore’s implementation and results of the death penalty for drug trafficking.

6. The swiftness of the execution of the death sentence in Singapore, ie the actual hanging itself, leaves no room or time enough for potential new evidence to be presented, especially with regards to the area of new technology in the sciences. (There have been cases in the US where new evidence were presented after many years which resulted in innocent convicts being freed.)

7. The argument that tax payers should not be footing the bill for convicted traffickers to stay in prison for life is, in my opinion, a flawed one based on nothing but a cold-hearted economical justification devoid of any humane consideration. While I do agree that the victims of drug consumption pays a heavy price, one must also not forget that those who take drugs do so by their own choice – just as those who traffick drugs do so by their own choice, ultimately. The state must rise above these vengeful inclinations and adopt more humane treatment – especially on those the state considers most heinous.

8. The possibility of rehabilitation is not explored fully with regards to small-time ‘runners’ or ‘mules’ .

9. There is no explicit initiatives, as far as I am aware, among ASEAN nations (which includes S’pore) to eradicate the production and source of most drugs in the region – especially from Burma (or Myanmar).

So far, what I have read by pro-death penalty advocates are blurry suggestions that the death penalty does work. There is no substantial evidence put forth to prop up their case.

While it is true that there can never be a perfect legal system, it does not mean that we do not try and make it as perfect as we can.

International standards

For a country which frequently pegs and benchmarks itself to international standards in anything from education to business, from sports to the arts, perhaps it is time Singapore looked into this issue and see if it can subscribe to international consensus on the death penalty as well.

Personally, the main (but not ‘the only’) objection I have is one of justification. That while we hang the small-time runners, we have not done enough as a member of ASEAN to effect the eradication of the source of drugs from Burma.

I stand corrected but Singapore is the biggest investor in Burma – according to this report.

So, while we hang the runners, we are doing business with the military junta in Burma which is closely-linked to the drug producers?

Perhaps this is the biggest irony.

That while we declare a “War On Drugs”, we continue to do business with a regime which is well-known for being closely-linked to the drug lords.

“With US$1.57 billion for 72 projects, Singapore tops the list of the 25 foreign investor countries in Myanmar. According to official data from Myanmar, Singapore is the largest exporter to Myanmar, and its second-largest trading partner after Thailand.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

年轻人投80履历工作仍没着落! 惟一些雇主称“找不到合适本地人才”

疫情下对本地就业市场带来冲击,从今年初至今,政府已出台了多达五次的财政援助措施,以期能协助企业和雇员度过疫情下的难关。 副总理王瑞杰等领袖,甚至预料未来数月会有更多人失业,然而这也让更多人开始质问,政府对于保障本地人就业的努力。 对于青年毕业生来说,当前刚毕业要觅职亦面对困难,甚至有年轻国人即使投了数十份履历,还是没能找到合适的全职工作!结果只好去兼职和学习新技能来度过当前危机。 据《今日报》报导,一名27岁受访者Hakim Wijaya,有两三年工作经验,再进入入拉萨尔艺术学院修读大学文凭毕业。然而,过去四个月,她应征多达80职位空缺,有回应只有寥寥数家,且条件也不尽人意。 还有26岁的大学毕业生Roy Ng也同样提交80份工作申请,还是找不到工作,结果打算再就读与商业相关的研究生课程,自我提升。还有者只得接受减薪保住工作。 还有更多类似的故事,例如26岁的准妈妈以为自己能保住饭碗,结果仍被公司裁员;再有原数码设计总监今年2月份被解雇,结果只能骑脚踏车送餐,收入从原本的8千多元,锐减至目前仅2千多元。 然而, 讽刺的是,一些雇主却认为,他们无法在新加坡找不到合适本地人才,例如本地金属包装制造厂Containers Printers总裁曾爱媄声称,虽曾考虑聘请新加坡人,但该公司工作需要一定的技术,聘请新人要花时间培训,所以人手不能说换就换。 一名建筑业者也表示,要找人替代自己公司的马国籍安全协调员不容易,安全管理人员需经过培训和考取证书,不是两三天的事,更何况目前都很少有这种能考取证书的课程在开班。…

GE2020 results show Singapore politics has changed permanently, says Tharman

The senior member of Peoples’ Action Party (PAP) Tharman Shanmugaratnam admitted in…

诉求有尊严的年长者护理服务

昨日,一名网民分享,岳父疑在疗养院未获妥善照料,以致病情恶化,即使向卫生部申诉要求调查,两年后也未有结果。 此事在社交媒体引起广泛回响。在我国将迈向人口老龄化,我们的乐龄群体,是否能享有妥善、可负担乃至有尊严的长期护理照顾,一直都是国民关心的课题。 这名网民王光祥的岳父不幸在今年8月离世,留下的不仅是亲人的思念,还有高昂医疗开销。 事实上,两个月前,也有报导指一名女儿入禀法庭,向救世军安乐之家疗养院索赔10万元。诉方指其百岁母亲在居住该疗养院的六年期间,身上多处受伤、无故跌倒,甚至让母亲下身只穿纸尿片坐在床上,不顾其尊严。 目前,住疗养院每月的开销预计介于1千200元至3千500元之间,中位数成本也在2千400元,也要依据长者的状况而定。 使用疗养院服务的年长者逾万人。在2020年,预计我国65岁以上人口将突破61万,到了2030年预计达到90万。显而易见,包括疗养院、居家或中心式看护等的长期护理服务的提升刻不容缓。 在本月10日,卫生部长颜金勇,在国会透过书面回答工人党非选区医院吴佩松,曾提及疗养院的看护服务,是针对那些需要更多照顾需求的体弱年长者,故此不适合拿疗养院的看护成本与居家看护对比。 他建议那些面对财务困难的民众,可联系医疗社工洽谈,或者动用保健基金(medifund)。 1700人参与居家个人看护计划 此外,目前有1千700明乐龄人士,参与居家个人看护(HPC)服务。他们接受日常起居的辅助,如沐浴和饮食,以及打扫起居、添购日用品,也陪老人进行锻炼身心活动。   居家个人看护服务在津贴前,收费平均为每小时23元,也取决于受照顾年长者的需求。符合条件者能获得80巴仙的津贴。若年长者有需求,居家看护服务提供者也能提供社区和财务支援。…

SDP: VERS and HIP II; More snake oil from PAP

Below is a statement by the Singapore Democratic Party in response to…