By The Kentang

Analysts say that the PAP’s embrace of Hip-Hop, in order to nudge towards a style of government more in tune with the local populace, is not a surprising move, despite being met by disbelief, satire, and outright laughter by Singaporeans. The Kentang interviewed several intellectuals who have managed, so far, to avoid defamation suits.

“When you think about it, it is almost to be expected,” says Professor Contraband Chan, currently a successful wet market pork merchant after resigning from her position as head of NUS’s department of Political Horticulture. “Today’s young Singaporeans like to see their minstrels in action, really getting down into the street and providing entertainment for the general populace.”

Politicians providing entertainment in order to win the hearts if not the minds of the people is nothing new, she asserts. “Dr. Chee Soon Juan has been doing it for years with his acts of civil disobedience, which Singaporeans laugh at, at every general election. The PAP has really just taken a leaf out of his book in their efforts to be their own opposition.”

Prof Chan adds that while civil disobedience, peaceful or not, is taken as a serious method to gain a voice in foreign countries, Singaporeans have been carefully nurtured since young to view such events as futile and amusing. “If the PAP dancers are good enough,” she concludes, “support for the SDP will dwindle as Singaporeans can find the political sideshows to ridicule within the PAP itself.”

Dr. Singalong Singh, a taxi driver with a PhD in Political Cosmology has a different take on the issue. While maintaining that the move was expected, he thinks that the choice of dance will not be helpful in approaching Singaporeans, young or old. “Hip-Hop is a culture that is almost antithetical to Singapore,” says Dr. Singh. As Ruby Pan puts it “Gangstas and Pimps and Hos’ barely exist in our imagination.”

Prof. Tupperware Tan, who lectures Singlish Morphology at top Australian Universities, sums up the general sentiment of all interviewed: that while government officials should be allowed to have fun, they should do so outside their role as an official. “Didn’t somebody say that we can’t choose who governs Singapore based on jokes, fun, games, and the like?” he quiped.

This entry is totally, completely and utterly satirical and should be taken as such.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【冠状病毒19】8月14日新增83确诊病例,无社区病例

本地新增83例冠状病毒19确诊病例,再次回跌两位数,且没有社区病例 根据卫生部发表的文告,截至今天(14日)中午12点,共83例新增病例,并无社区病例。而入境病例则四例,所有入境病例在入境后开始履行居家通知。 其余新增病例均为隔离中的工作准证持有人。本地病例总数目前累计5万5580起。 当局正在搜集新病例的详情,并会在今晚提供更多细节。

陈振声驳斥 CECA没给印度国民移民我国“开方便之门”

新加坡贸工部长陈振声指出,新加坡-印度全面经济合作协定(Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement,简称CECA)并没有授予印度国民无条件进入我国,或成为我国移民的特权。 他于周末(9日)指出,“有关双边协议为国人带来了就业机会,旨在减轻经济不稳定时民众的担忧”。 在社媒和网上流传的一个说法,指CECA允许印度国民夺走我国专业人员、经理、高管和技术人员(简称PMET)的就职机会。 陈振声指出,和其他国家或地区的专才一样,印度专才也必须符合我国人力部的资格标准,才能到我国工作,或申请就业准证、S准证等。 他表示,我国自由贸易协定网络自2005年以来,已经增加了40万份就业机会,达到125万个,但是他并没有声明有关就业机会中,有多少是因为CECA而获得,也没有指出国人从中受益多少。 “我们了解且明白国人在目前的不稳定经济环境下,产生了对竞争力和就业前景的担忧。但是误导国人并不能帮助到他们,只会制造恐慌和愤怒。” “要帮助国人,首先我们要扩大企业市场,持续培训我国员工,以保持优势的竞争力。并且不让他人煽动我国的种族主义可人民恐惧,更不该因为个人私心或政治理由而如此做。” CECA放宽外劳工作证条例 然而,自CECA合约在2005年生效以来,我国在发放工作准证给印度籍员工方面都比较宽松。在CECA条约下,两国人民可以进行的事项包括了:…

Iraqi reporter seriously wounded day after activist’s killing sparks protests

An Iraqi journalist was in intensive care after being shot in the…

【选举】人民之声将角逐榜鹅西单选区

人民之声将角逐榜鹅西单选区。 人民之声领袖林鼎律师于今早(24日)宣布将竞选榜鹅西区单选区。榜鹅西原本在白沙—榜鹅集选区,但在今年3月的选区范围检讨委会报告中,被划分出来成独立单选区,选民人数约2万5440人。 林鼎表示,人民之声团队在过去16个月内,就马不停蹄在曾是上述地区服务,如今榜鹅西被划分出来,该党也决定竞选。 “人民之声非常幸运能够拥有众多优秀的人选,致力于为民服务,不过由于需要与其他政党配合,能够参选的选区有限,因此无法将所有人派上场。” “经过深思熟虑,人民之声也将会加入榜鹅西单选区的角逐,我们的团队在该区服务了16个月,相信对于此次竞选也相当有利。”