school-resized.jpgBy Choenix

If I were as highly acclaimed as Steven Levitt, I’ll ask for the statistics of the number of teachers who have left the profession and check if the increased monetary incentives over the years have slowed down the attrition rates among teachers. If increasing monetary incentives to the teachers cannot slow down attrition rates, perhaps money is not the reason why teachers leave.

But I’m not the author of an international bestseller or a Harvard professor, so I won’t get my hands on those presumably confidential statistics and would have to contend with my own observations and experiences to answer my question of why do teachers stop wanting to be teachers?

Browsing through the websites of Singapore institutions these days, it would be hard to miss the achievements that school administrators so proudly put out to impress the world with. Nowadays, schools can be accredited with the Singapore Quality Class award, the Greed Audit Award, the School Distinction Award, the People Development Award and numerous Best Practices and Sustained Achievement Awards…just to name a few.

Schools also announce their vision and mission to be a niche school in sports, in the arts or even national education. One certainly wonders what being a niche school in National Education entails, that the students display exceptional commitment and patriotism to Singapore ? There is of course a very pragmatic reason for this paper-chase at the country-level.

With that many schools achieving awards and accreditations, Singapore can truly become the education hub it is striving to be; the more the awards, the better the education; the higher the accreditation, the more robust the academic program. Whether or not the relationship between awards and academic rigor is true, a very real consequence is that the nation will reap economic benefits from foreign students flocking to our sea of highly decorated academies.

school-resized.jpgConsequences of many awards

While this benefits the country economically, to the average teacher, the pursuit of the awards accredited by external agencies or higher authorities entail writing reports and running surveys with students, not to mention being interviewed and quizzed on processes and procedures. This translates to less time to prepare for lessons and less energy to spend with the students. Of course, one would argue that this paper chase would take only a fraction of the teacher’s time. Surely the passion of the teacher will make sure that all these procedures and reports are quickly completed so that the more important task of teaching can be attended to.

In tandem with IDA’s InfoComm 21 exercise, the Masterplan for IT in Education was unveiled in 1997 to equip our young with essential learning skills, creative thinking skills and communication skills. This means that teachers have to be IT-savvy too in order to impart the relevant skills to the students.

But surely the passionate teachers can get all these electronic data entry done quickly so that the more important task of teaching can be attended to. You get the drift.

When I first became a high school teacher, I remember spending time with my students in the school tuckshop to talk about their dreams and aspirations. A few years into the teaching profession, I was still talking to them about their ambitions and plans for the future…after they have made an appointment one week in advance so that the discussion of their future will not clash with the data entry deadlines, accreditation report-writing and upgrading courses.

I cannot be sure why teachers stop wanting to be teachers but I think it might be because they stop thinking of themselves as teachers and more as administrators and corporate executives.
A re-look at performance appraisal?

The performance appraisal at the end of the year hits teachers and professionals in the private sector in more or less the same way. For teachers, the appraisal process comes in the form of the Enhanced Performance Management System which allows for a “structured process of assessing the performance of officers based on competencies and focused on helping teacher identify areas of improvement”.

My memory might have failed me but I do not recall a “love for students” criterion or a “passion for teaching” scale. The current system measures how competent the teacher is in other aspects and assesses whether teachers are performing their duties adequately. A better performance bonus will usually await those who perform beyond what is expected of them.

For now, this means that a good teacher is one who teaches well but the excellent teacher is one who not only teaches well but one who can rake in the awards or implement a new IT initiative.

Of course, passionate teachers can look beyond the pecuniary incentives and concentrate on inspiring their students. These dedicated ones shouldn’t feel the pressure to do more than just good teaching. After all, the love for the students and passion for teaching is immeasurable and should overcome all odds. Besides, if they concentrated on loving and caring for their students, they would be assessed as good teachers, not excellent according to the system, but good nonetheless.

It is great that teachers are regarded as professionals but one wonders if the usual professional standards and assessment criteria can be applied to the teaching service. After all, teaching is as much a calling as it is a profession. Some may even see it as an extension of parenting and if we were to regard teaching as a calling as we do with religious work or parenting, would we still apply the same set of criteria? Would we fill out an enhanced performance management system form to assess the piousness of a religious worker or ascertain the level of professionalism of parents?

I still don’t have an answer as to why teachers stop wanting to be teachers but I’m guessing that it is because teachers are now assessed on how much they can produce rather than how much they love their charges.

Returning to the core of teaching

To the pragmatic person, all this talk about passion and love may be too ephemeral and idealistic but I think it is precisely because we have pushed so far into the drive for efficiency and professionalism that we need to return to the core of the profession.

The teachers and processes make education possible but the children are the ones who are the most important. If we look at the children nowadays, I believe they need love more than they need the awards that their school have or the IT skills that schools can impart to them. They need more passionate teachers because their overwrought and overworked parents are already giving them as much care and concern as they can muster.

If we begin with this perspective to tackle the question, perhaps we will then be looking at how to enable the teachers to spend more quality time with their charges. Resources that are spent on making teachers more efficient and professional would be channeled to hiring teaching assistants to help teachers cope with the relentless assault of administrative work. The paper chase at the schools level would be left to the tertiary institutions like in so many other countries. Teachers would be recognized and rewarded for their great teaching regardless of their new initiatives and new projects.

In short, let teachers do more of what they are passionate about – being in the classroom and teaching their students.

If they get to do more of what inspired them to teach in the first place, I don’t think that many of them would stop wanting to be teachers.

————————

About the author:

The writer was in the service of the Ministry of Education and is currently pursuing his Masters degree. He believes himself to be still passionate about teaching and hopes to take his dream of making a difference in his students’ life wherever he teaches, be it in the schools, in the university; in Singapore or (now that he has written this commentary) outside of his island home.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

趁火打劫? 口罩一个售一元遭网民怒轰

如今口罩已经一个难求,有人更是“趁火打劫”,当起“流动口罩商贩”,一个口罩共售一元,一盒则要价40元,引起网民怒轰。 日前,有网民在裕廊西地区(JurongWest),52街第505座巴刹和小贩中心的停车场上发现有人当场售卖口罩,而且要价一个一元,相当昂贵。 据网民所拍下的照片显示,该名男子车子的后车厢里放置数箱箱子,而箱子内为口罩,箱子上还贴了一张告示,相信是说明口罩价钱。 网民指出,经他仔细一看才发现,一个口罩竟然要价一元,而且若需购买一盒则开价40元,比起市面上的价钱还高。 据网民表示,男子在期间并没有大声叫卖,或招揽生意,尽管路过的人会多看几眼,但也没有人上前购买。或许是注意到大众的视线,男子并没有逗留太久,“摆摊”不到30分钟,便开车走人。 网民最后也发文后谴责,囤货已经是相当恶劣的行为,而且还要售价一元一个,或一盒40元,不应趁火打劫,应该将口罩留给更需要的人,为他人着想,例如前线人员。 此文一出,立即引起网民关注,截至目前已获得8500转载,1200赞,网民纷纷指责该名男子不应趁火打劫,购买大量口罩然后以高价售卖,甚至要求有关当局介入调查。 除了发生在裕廊西,义顺地区也出现类似的高价兜售口罩事件,义顺集选区国会议员黄国光日前于脸书表示,在对抗病毒期间,接连收到投诉称部分商家口罩定价过高,例如一盒N95口罩(内含20个)售价竟然达138元。 黄国光说道,“这是不对的,一盒口罩竟然要价138元,许多义顺居民已向我投诉,而且我也前往店面查询,并与工作人员谈谈。“ 他续指,任何人都可以售卖口罩,但不应借此牟取暴利。他也提醒零售商在此时抬高价格售卖口罩,有关当局可能会采取行动。 由于市面上已“一罩难求”,许多民众也会透过网络查询口罩存货,而无良商家却趁此机会坐地起价,曾将口罩卖到288元,引起大批网民怒骂。 许多网络平台如旋转拍卖(Carousell)与Qoo10也欲请卖家勿“坐地起价”。若发现定价不合理的口罩将要求卖家纠正,而卖家如不遵循,将可能会被撤下。

K Shanmugam masterfully links photo and comment of Thum Ping Tjin as him inviting foreign politician to intervene in Singapore politics

Speaking on sidelines of a grassroots event on Sunday, Home Affairs and…

社论:奉,唯才是举之名

原文:Augustine Low 奉唯才是举之名,推举已故李光耀的儿子为总理。 奉唯才是举之名,总理夫人成为淡马锡的总裁。 只要高举唯才是举的大旗,总理的私人律师可以成为总检察长;行动党议员可以受委副检察长。 以唯才是举之名,高级部长的妻子也可以成为总审计长。 多少年来,藉著唯才是举(meritocracy)的精神,多少上流阶层的子女获得声望最高的奖学金? 又有多少有权势的夫妻档、兄弟家族,立基于精英主义? 几十年来,新加坡始终钟爱着和拥抱唯才是举制度。 1958年,英国社会和工党政治家麦可杨(Michael Young),在他的一本讽刺小说里发明了“Meritocracy”这个词汇。他在2001年,在英国《卫报》一篇抨击英国首相布莱尔的文章,毫不留情地抨击唯才是举制度: “这些精英相信、当然他们也一再被鼓吹,他们凭藉自己的实力才干取得成就。他们会认为自己值得拥有这一切,不免感到沾沾自喜,相比下,他人可能知道他们的成就,只不过是受益于裙带关系、他们是某某人的子女,而不是因为他们的才干。…

Future media: Revolving door of the Centre

~by: Howard Lee~ Pole positions of the media When I spoke to Viswa…