fotf
The controversial workshop attended by Hwa Chong Institution (HCI) student, Agatha Tan, is “not a sexuality education program”, the Christian charity which runs the programme says.
Instead, Focus on the Family (FOTF) says it is “designed to be a relationship program to help young people unravel the world of the opposite sex, uncover the truths of love and dating, and reveal what it takes to have healthy and meaningful relationships.”
The charity defended the programme after it came under fire from Ms Tan, a first year student at HCI, who wrote about her experience attending one of these workshops.
In a lengthy post on her Facebook page which was directed at her school principal, Ms Tan said the programme, titled “Uncomplicated”, “seemed to emphasise traditional gender roles in a relationship.”
“From merely glancing through this booklet,” she said, referring to the handout at the workshop, “I learned a simple yet important lesson: that bigotry is very much alive and it was naïve of me to think I could be safe from it even in school.”
Ms Tan charged that “the workshop and booklet actively serve to promote rape culture in school.”
For example, she referred to the cover page of the booklet itself where “it is written, ‘no means yes?’ and ‘yes means no?’”
“The facilitators from FOTF neglected to mention that thinking a girl means ‘yes’ when she says ‘no’ is actually completely wrong,” Ms Tan says. “Rather, they spent their four hours with us discussing things such as what a girl ‘really means’ when she says something else, as opposed to guys who are ‘direct’ and ‘always mean what they say’.”
Among some of the things which the booklet says are that “gals need to be loved”, and that “gals” have “a deep need for her boyfriend to find her beautiful.”
Ms Tan also took issue with the programme’s claims that “emotional security” and “closeness” are “far more important to [girls] than financial security.”
She describes this as “a questionable and even insulting claim, as is the claim that having a guy listen to a girl’s feelings “automatically solves the problem”.
“This sexist attitude not only trivializes girls’ problems, but also serves as a foundation for the further boosting of the male ego FotF seems so invested in doing,” Ms Tan says.
Guys, on the other hand, seem to be given a different treatment, she says.
“Guys, on the other hand, are portrayed as guardians who can ultimately do no wrong even when they are evidently doing wrong,” Ms Tan says.
She describes how the booklet portrays guys as “[needing] respect” and “are insecure”.
“While guys don’t want a girl to pretend to be clueless,” the booklet says, “they also don’t want a girlfriend that questions their opinions and argues with their decisions all the time.”
Ms Tan feels that in the same way that the booklet simplifies and generalises girls, the same is done for guys.
“However, I am also sure you agree that this view about guys does not hold true for everyone,” Ms Tan says. “Much as girls have been generalized and simplified in this booklet, so too have guys, and this is fair for neither gender. Yet while the simplification of girls serves to belittle their importance as individuals, the gross simplification of guys serves to boost their egos by perpetuating the message that anything and everything guys do is excusable simply because it is wired into them.”
She also took issue with how the programme seems to discriminate against minority groups such as the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender community.
Ms Tan expresses concerns that “the quickness and ease with which the facilitator dismissed anyone outside of his limited moral framework” of a heterosexual relationship “was a clear display of bigotry and tells students that acceptance is beyond him.”
“For someone questioning their identity, having someone in a position of authority tell them that they simply did not matter if they were not straight is emotionally destructive,” Ms Tan says.
She says “the school has a responsibility to the diverse school population.”
“[Even] if the school is unable and unwilling to provide inclusive sexuality education for students,” she says, “it has a basic responsibility to ensure that it is a place free of bigotry where students can at least feel safe to study in without fear of being persecuted for who they are or are figuring themselves out to be.”
Ms Tan then says the school, by engaging the services of groups such as FOTF to teach sexuality education in school, has “indirectly” participated “in promoting rape culture.”
“[It] tells students that we should conform to traditional gender roles instead of being our own persons, demonstrates that the acceptance of diversity in people is unimportant, and erases minority groups in the student population,” she says.
In response to Ms Tan’s online post, FOTF says that the workshop is not a sexuality programme, and that the charity is in touch “with the relevant parties” to address Ms Tan’s concerns.
Ms Vicky Ho, the spokesperson for FOTF, says that the programme curriculum is based on “well-researched material by various trusted family life and relationship experts.”
Ms Ho, however, did not provide details of these, or the number of schools which FOTF is currently running the workshop.
A cursory online check finds that some of the content in the booklet is also found in humour websites, such as Humor Is Contagious and Jumbo Joke.

[Right: from "Humor is Contagious"]
[Right: from “Humor is Contagious”]
The Ministry of Education, which approves such programmes, has not responded to the public uproar.
FOTF is headed by Jason Wong, who is also the executive director of Honour (Singapore), a non-governmental organisation which was itself in the news recently, after The Online Citizen raised questions of its Christian members on its board.
Read also: “God sneaks into our classroom

Subscribe
Notify of
7 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

偷拍友人强奸过程 前收银员被判囚15个月

偷拍朋友强奸和性侵女郎画面,前收银员被判坐牢15个月,罚款2万零800元,更被法官怒斥“可恶”。 34岁的被告严顺才,之前是明苑(Ming Arcade)大厦一酒廊的收银员,他被指控触犯《影片法令》,面对三项控状。 他被指和四名友人在度假村强奸和性侵一名24岁的女子,并且乘机偷拍友人强奸和性侵过程。 涉案的另外四人分别是和被告在同一间酒廊工作的叶俊杰(39岁,经理)及杨俊宏(30岁,经理),以及被告的朋友,40岁的杨伟杰和27岁的郑文发。 据法庭文件显示,郑文发于去年9月16日,在白沙乐怡度假村定了两晚住宿,约被告等人一起过夜。 其中三人,即被告、郑文华和杨俊宏于9月17日午夜时分,乘着杨伟杰的车子到酒廊去,杨俊宏和被告去上班,而郑文发及杨伟杰则在该处喝酒。 待被告等两人在早上7时下班时,他们就顺便载着叶俊杰和一名24岁的女子返回度假村。 当时,被告察觉女郎似乎已经没有意识了,郑文发就在车上开始对女郎上下其手,叶俊杰和杨俊宏见了也加入非礼行列。 回到度假村之后,叶俊杰当场强奸女郎。郑文发当时就用女郎的手为他手淫,甚至强迫女郎口交。当时躺在隔壁床的被告见状,就偷偷拿起手机拍下强奸过程。 郑文发发现被告录影后,立即阻止被告,并且将女郎带到厕所去。(以上人名皆为译音)

狮城新西兰升级版经济伙伴协议 后天生效

《新加坡与新西兰密切经济伙伴协议》(ANZSCEP)的升级协议,将在后天(2020年1月1日)生效。 贸工部长陈振声指出,上述协议迅速批准和生效,意味着两国对维护开放且依循规章贸易体制的承诺。他相信这有助于减少贸易壁垒,增加监管合作和电子商务方面的努力,让两国企业受益。“我期待加深两国经济关系。” 新加坡和新西兰是在2001年签署ANZSCEP,也是我国签署的第一份双边自贸协定(FTA)。我国出口新西兰关税取消,也依据出口商申报商品提供关税优惠,保障市场通行和两国投资者。 两国自2017年6月起,针对升级ANZSCEP协定进行谈判;最终在今年5月17日,新西兰总理阿尔登(Jacinda Ardern)到访我国并签署上述升级协议。 新加坡和新西兰都是拟议中的跨太平洋伙伴关系(TTP)12国之一,自美国总统川普推出TPP后,便促成跨太平洋全面进步协定。 狮城新西兰经济和国防关系 两国双边贸易关系在2018年同比增长12.1巴仙,增至410亿新元。 根据新西兰官方数据,我国也是新西兰的第六大投资国,截至2017年底投资额约为39亿新元。 此外,两国也透过东盟国防部长扩大会议(ADMM-Plus)和五国联防协议( Five-Power Defence Arrangements)等平台展现紧密的国防合作关系。自1997年,我国武装部队都会到新西兰怀乌鲁(Waiouru)进行实弹演习。

Singapore’s less than stellar review by Human Rights Watch World Report 2020

Singapore’s government placed greater restrictions on the country’s already sharply curtailed free…

希盟“分崩离析”、流失马来人支持 前外交官比拉哈里:致新马关系升温

新加坡外交部前常任秘书比拉哈里认为,现今的马国执政联盟希望联盟正“分崩离析”,加上无法稳住马来族群的支持,也导致新马两国不睦关系加剧。 他也指出,当希盟在去年的马国第14届选举中获胜执政,马上新马两国的陈年旧账又被搬到台面上。 近期发生的新马双边课题包括新马水供、新柔港口界限以及领空议题。比拉哈里指出,这些都是长久无法解决的课题,并指出马国只是想拿这些课题来炒作,藉此继续争取民众的支持。 根据《透视大马》报导,在新加坡国立大学举行的一场题为《新加坡、印尼和马来西亚关系》讲座上,比拉哈里向在场约200名学生表示,马哈迪把新加坡当成“妖怪”(bogeyman)鞭挞,乃是屡试不爽的策略,以前当巫统领导人是这样,现在成为希盟土著团结党主席后也这样。 希盟出现内斗 “这已经不只是个人历史包袱的问题了”,他说,马哈迪的个人特色固然是导因之一,但最重要的是,希盟政府盟党行动不一致,内部已在分裂。 他引述默迪卡民调中心的研究,指出马来选票被希盟、巫统以及伊斯兰党瓜分,这三大政党正为马国最大族群的选票而竞争。 他认为,如果希盟要在来届选举继续执政,必将拼力保住马来人选票,这也将加剧希盟内部的不稳定。 基于希盟内斗以及伊斯兰教原教旨主义的壮大,他预见马国政局动荡仍会持续一段时日。 比拉哈里建议我国的新领导层,要和马国打交道,就要继续维持我国的军事能力,展现实力,这是因为马国领导人会“一直试图打压和驯服我国”,即便新加坡已是受认可的主权国家。 “今天,我们的邻邦把我们当作主权国家,这是因为我们发展出了他们无可忽视的能力。” 武力胁迫和谈判都是外交的一部分…