Wondering what's the fuss about the 8-lane highway that the Government is planning to build through the historic Bukit Brown Cemetery? Well here are 5 of the most frequently asked questions and their answers.

1. Isn’t it a good thing to destroy a part of Bukit Brown for faster roads & a residential estate? After all, the dead don’t mind and the living will benefit. How much new housing area can be created with the destruction of Bukit Brown?

Err, we’re not sure the dead don’t mind! But even if they don’t, the enormous historical, cultural, environmental value of Bukit Brown far outweighs the benefits of a four-way road that seeks to "bring relief to the increasingly congested Lornie Road" (ST, 20 Nov 2011). We believe that other creative solutions can be found to relieve traffic congestion. Furthermore, there are only 111 cars per 1,000 people* in Singapore. Why should Bukit Brown and so many other precious historical sites make way to serve this small proportion of the population? Destruction is forever.

As for the benefit of new housing, the government’s plan is to build a “future estate that spans more than 200ha – bigger than Serangoon and slated to have a mix of private and public housing. Although this will be developed only in 30 to 40 years, the new road is necessary today to bring relief to the increasingly congested Lornie Road.” While this will benefit people, we feel that the government can choose to provide more housing area by first developing many other spaces that have much less historical & cultural value compared to Bukit Brown (e.g. golf courses).

In fact, the Final Report of the Focus Group on Land Allocation submitted to the Ministry of National Development in December 2000 already calls for the preservation of green spaces and building buildings taller to make land use more efficient. The Land Transport Authority’s 2008 Land Transport Master Plan likewise advocates both making public transport, especially rail, the mode of choice for commuters and controlling vehicle population growth. Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam reiterated these points in his recent 2012 Budget Speech. Preserving Bukit Brown is consistent with these goals.

*For the official figures from the Department of Statistics, Singapore, see:
http://www.singstat.gov.sg/stats/keyind.html#socind (under “Social Indicators”)
http://www.singstat.gov.sg/pubn/reference/sif2011.pdf (page 18)

 

2. The government has indicated that they will only destroy 5,000 graves. That’s only 5% of Bukit Brown. And they aren’t even the graves of “famous people”. So isn’t that ok?

Famous or ordinary, we want to symbolically honour them all as pioneers of Singapore. And we feel that this proposed destruction of 5% of Bukit Brown in 2012 is merely testing the waters of public opinion. If we do not speak up against it now, one day there will be the eventual & complete destruction of Bukit Brown, and with it, the great value of this shared historical space.

3. There is already some documentation work going on for the graves that will be destroyed. Isn’t that adequate for preserving our memories?

We thank Dr Hui Yew-Foong & his team for doing this back-breaking work of documentation. This should go on even if Bukit Brown is preserved, as the gravestones will eventually become illegible due to wear & tear. However, we believe there is a huge intangible difference between reading about Bukit Brown’s documentation in a book or museum, and having the actual sensory experience of walking in a physical space among the trees and quiet gravestones, reflecting on our shared history and culture. We want this for our children too.

4. Hardly anyone remembered Bukit Brown before the proposed destruction. Now suddenly there’s all this hype. Surely this will all die down (no pun intended)?

In our rush to study, work, earn & just keep up with this frantic pace of life, we have neglected so much of our history and culture. This wake-up call has made many Singaporeans take a trip to Bukit Brown to enjoy the scenary and appreciate its great historical and cultural value. We want to preserve this not just for Singaporeans in 2011, but for generations to come.

5. How feasible is it to preserve Bukit Brown as a heritage park or cemetary park?

We believe it is highly feasible. From Paris to Penang, London to Los Angeles, Montreal to Malacca, and many many more, cemeteries are integral to the living space of many metropolitan areas, serving as parks, heritage sites, and public spaces. Some have more than one cemetery park. If other cities can, why can’t Singapore? Here are some links to cemetery parks in cities around the world:

  1. Yanaka Cemetery, Tokyo, Japan
  2. Aoyama Cemetery, Tokyo, Japan
  3. Bukit Cina, Melaka, Malaysia
  4. Protestant Cemetery, Penang, Malaysia
  5. Los Angeles, California, USA – CemeteryTour.com, Cemetery Tours: Who's Who of Hollywood
  6. San Francisco, California, USA
  7. Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
  8. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  9. Atlanta, Georgia, USA
  10. Washington, DC, USA
  11. Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
  12. Berlin, Germany – Cemetery Berlin, List of Cemeteries in Berlin
  13. Moscow, Russia
  14. Vienna, Austria – Central Cemetery (Zentralfried), Touring Cemeteries of Vienna
  15. Beijing, China
  16. St. Petersburg, Russia
  17. The French Quarter, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA – New Orleans Cemeteries, Cemetries of New Orleans, Chalmette National Cemetery
  18. Hong Kong (Happy Valley) Cemetery, Hong Kong – Find a GraveHong Kong Cemetery

 

Save Singapore's Nature & Heritage. Join The Fight To Save Bukit Brown!

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

李显龙:将提高退休和重新雇佣年龄

新加坡总理李显龙昨日在星耀樟宜,录制国庆献词。今年他在献词中提到,针对那些想要继续工作的国人,政府会提高退休年龄和重新雇佣年龄。不过具体详情,在8月18日的国庆群众大会才会公布。 总理称,政府打算减轻本地家庭在学前和高等教育方面的负担,尤其是为中低收入家庭提供实在的帮助。我们也努力满足年长国人的医疗和退休需求,更好地保障他们的晚年生活。 他承认今年我国经济增长放缓,国际需求和贸易额减少,进而影响本地制造业和一些服务业。尤其是去年表现比较强劲的电子业,今年也 因为全球电子业下滑而受到波及。 “不过,一些领域目前的表现还算比较好。 这类经济放缓的情形,我们也曾经历过。我们这次也将沉着应对。如果有必要,我们会采取刺激经济的措施。” 他说,面对全球性问题如贸易保护主义探头、大国之间摩擦加剧和气候暖化等,我国也难免受影响,全球供应链打乱, 改变了贸易模式以及国际投资的流向。 “我们必须做好准备,迎向截然不同 的未来。”他表示,为确保经济增长,将积极推动企业转型,取得不错的进展,例如制造先进的飞机零件,同时不断研发新的疾病治疗法,并推进金融科技服 务的发展。 政府正在扩建海港和机场,以满足亚洲蓬勃发展所带来的需求;提升两座综合娱乐城的设施,以吸引更多游客。本地的科技与创新领域发展良好。多个政府机构正在帮助企业增强实力、扩充业务和 进军国际市场。…

Conviction wrong, sentence manifestly excessive: Amos Yee

Teen blogger, Amos Yee, who was sentenced to four weeks’ jail on…

需证实所住客工宿舍不再传播病毒 装修客工才能重返岗位

昨日(3日)建设局(BCA)发文告指出,在进入第一阶段解封期间,当局批准逾5400项住宅装修项目复工。 内政部兼国家发展部高级政务次长孙雪玲,则在脸书解答民众疑惑,包括这段期间是否有足够的工友可复工? 她解释,那些住在组屋或私人住宅单位的装修工人,在获得批准之后,就能马上复工。 “这是因为他们在阻断措施实行期间,应当有遵守居家通知,在家里待了28天,因此不需要先通过冠病检测。” 不过,如果装修承包商员工住在客工宿舍,那么他们必须等到有关宿舍,被证实不再传播病毒,那么客工才能获准复工。她指出,这也是为了保障装修工人本身、屋主和社区的安全,尽可能阻止病毒传播。 但即便如此,一些承包商的装修工程仍可能延误,这是因为一些业者雇员来自马来西亚,目前还不能过来新加坡;有者面对供应链问题,无法取得特定材料等。 为此,孙雪玲呼吁大家能体谅其中难处,目前仍需警惕病毒重新扩散。

建议公交增无线上网? 网民:我们只想准时抵达不误点!

交通暨通讯高级政务部长普杰立,昨日出席于榜鹅水滨坊举行的2040年陆路交通发展总蓝图公众咨询活动。他在该活动分享,陆交局从民众反馈中发现,只要通勤行程方便和有良好、舒适体验,民众并不介意更长的通勤时间。 陆路交通局至今收集了五千多名公众,针对2040年陆路交通发展总蓝图的反馈。 根据《亚洲新闻台》报导,普杰立说,有民众提出“希望公共交通中有无线上网服务、希望有更舒适的通勤体验,这样民众即使在通勤中,也还能听歌、查电邮、和亲友交谈。” 有关总蓝图预计在明年出炉,提倡“走、骑、搭”的出行方式。当局自今年八月,已透过小组讨论、网络问卷、公众咨询活动等形式,收集超过五千名公众的反馈。 75巴仙受访者强调公交便捷度 超过三分之二人士希望当局能为行人、脚踏车骑士和个人代步工具用户,提供更多使用空间和优先权,使走道更安全,更多人愿意步行或踏脚车。 此外,有75巴仙认为“便捷”最重要;63巴仙强调公交的“相互连接贯通”、59巴仙则强调“快捷”。 同时,民众反馈中也希望公交系统应更加照顾不同群体需求,例如让更有需要的群体优先使用捷运的电梯,并鼓励民众为他们提供帮助等。 民众:我们只想准时抵达! 然而,有很多网民在《亚洲新闻台》的有关报导贴文留言,却显示另一番的反馈,作为每日上下班的上班族、通勤人士等等,许多网民就直接了当指出,他们只要求公交准时抵达、价格合理可负担。 他们直言,比起公交的安全、准时程度,无限上网服务根本就是多此一举、锦上添花的不切实际建议,根本不符合普罗通勤民众的需求。 也有民众质疑,“羊毛出在羊身上”,这些附加服务,是否会推高公交运营成本?最终这些增加的成本,最终还是要转嫁给消费者,消费者享有着不是迫切需要的服务,却要为此买单。…