photo: businesstimes.com.sg

I refer to the article “Commentary: Where will Singapore’s next tax dollar come from?” (Channel NewsAsia, Apr 29).
It states that “Back home, we are similarly on the cusp of a comprehensive tax review in Singapore. The Committee on the Future Economy (CFE) had advocated reshaping Singapore’s tax system given domestic and global imperatives, while maintaining a broad based, progressive and fair tax regime in its report released in February.
Building on the strategies outlined by the CFE, Finance Minister Heng Swee Keat further stressed at Budget 2017 the need for Singapore to grow its revenue base to finance rising healthcare and infrastructure expenditures, and do so in a pro-growth and progressive manner.”
So, has government expenditure been increasing in the recent decades?
Healthy historical Budget surpluses?
Yes, but government revenue has also been increasing, such that we have been having healthy Budget surpluses in about seven or eight out of every 10 years or so.
For example, last year’s Budget surplus was $5.18 billion.
Even larger surpluses (IMF fiscal reporting guidelines)?
The cash budget surplus under International Monetary Fund (IMF) fiscal  reporting guidelines (which does not allow certain one-time transfers to trust and endowment funds to be counted as expenditure and require certain revenues like land sales to be counted) has been about $20 billion a year.
$1 trillion reserves?
In fact, our Budget surpluses may have contributed to an estimated accumulated reserves of about one trillion dollars.
Not spending money on CPF, HDB & healthcare?
Moreover, as I have analysed in countless articles, presentations, videos, published an academic paper (8,000 words), etc – from a cashflow perspective – the Government may not have been spending any money on our CPF, HDB and healthcare.
Most taxed people on earth?
Also, if we track the cashflows of the Government and the people, such as our historical total CPF contributions and returns, HDB revenue transferred to the Singapore Land Authority for land at market rates, etc – we may be the most implicitly taxed people in the world relative to the social benefits which we receive.
In the final analysis, do we really need to increase taxes, especially now that we are in an economic downturn?
Let’s talk?
I hope that this issue may be vigorously debated in Parliament, in our academic institutions and think-tanks, civil society, etc.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

It’s not whether Tharman is popular, it’s whether he is suitable

Opinion: Despite Tharman Shanmugaratnam’s high popularity, questions about his suitability for presidency persist due to his long-standing ties with the People’s Action Party (PAP) and conflicting views on the president’s independence.

Lim Tean: Making it easy for the rich does not make the rest of us richer!

In a Facebook post, Peoples Voice chief Lim Tean questioned Singapore’s government’s reliance on “trickle-down” economics, despite evidence to the contrary. Mr Lim notes that the lives of Singaporeans have not improved but regressed this century. He also calls attention to the issue of the super-rich from China driving up prices in Singapore and investing little in the country. He asserts that for the rich, it is socialism, but for the rest of the population, it is brutal capitalism. Mr Lim encourages his readers to question for whom the “shining city on the hill” was built and notes that many Singaporeans are struggling to make ends meet in the most expensive city in the world.

The fact that we are even talking about a Singaporean core shows that our leaders have failed Singaporeans

by Augustine Low Have you heard of the Malaysian core? What about…