Chee Soon Juan, the leader of the opposition Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), wrote an article about how education system in Singapore has changed worryingly.
He noted that Singapore is in a crisis, yet, the People’s Action partty (PAP) shows only little indication that the party gets it.
Pupils, as early as Primary 3, students in selected ‘elite’ schools are subjected to a series of tests for entrance into the Gifted Education Programme. Only the highest-scoring 5 percent qualify.
While, the rest undergo the Primary School Leaving Examintion, or PSLE. Depending on one’s results, a student is shunted to the Express, Normal (Academic) or Normal (Technical) stream.
Dr Chee writes that Education Minister (Schools) Ng Chee Meng sees the problem and acknowledges that the system produces workers who are technically competent but “do not think out of the box and lack the derring-do to push boundaries”.
These traits, he noted, need to be nurtured from young. He exhorted pupils to chiong, the Hokkien vernacular for taking risks. “It’s a mindset,” he said. “An attitude of wanting to do better, find break-throughs, of wanting to innovate…taking into account the risks involved and doing it anyway.”
Here is what he wrote in full:

THE BACKLASH AGAINST globalisation has never been stronger, the oil and gas industry is in the doldrums and seems far from recovering, the adoption of clean energy is moving faster than anyone had anticipated, China is aggressively investing in infrastructure in Malaysia and beyond, and jobs are being rapidly lost to automation.
These developments are conspiring to render Singapore irrelevant to the world. Make no mistake: A crisis is in the making, that is, if it’s not already upon us.
Yet, there is little indication that the PAP gets it. If it did, it would not continue to stymie the development of our only lifeline: an innovative culture.
In this domain, nothing is more critical than education. But the system here, stuck in an era designed more for the industrial revolution rather than the digital one, shows no sign of a rebirth.
We put our children through endless rounds of tests and exams, and then pigeon-hole them according to their scores. This classification limits the options of their study for the rest of their school career and, thereafter for the overwhelming majority, options of their careers for the rest of their lives.
As early as Primary 3, students in selected ‘elite’ schools are subjected to a series of tests for entrance into the Gifted Education Programme. Only the highest-scoring 5 percent qualify.
The rest undergo the Primary School Leaving Examintion, or PSLE. Depending on one’s results, a student is shunted to the Express, Normal (Academic) or Normal (Technical) stream.
Higher-scoring Express students undergo a four-year secondary school career while the Normal-stream students will be put through their paces over five years.
At Secondary 2, Express students are further tested and streamed into those taking ‘Pure’ or ‘Combined’ Sciences, the former emphasise Physics and/or Chemistry and Biology while the latter is more focused in the Arts and Humanities.
At Secondary 4 (Secondary 5 for Normal-stream students), the kids sit for the O-Level examinations. The better performers go on to Junior College at the end of which the sit for the A-Level exams to determine their entry into the university. The remainder opt for a polytechnic or the Institute for Technical Education.
Delayed development, the various types of intelligence, and gender and individual differences are cast aside in a mill that grinds out students better equipped to regurgitate information than critically process it.
Students make the memorisation of answers in the Ten-Year Series (publications of past-exam questions) an art form. Tuition centres even advertise “How to spot the tricky questions that can make or break your child’s goal of getting A”.
Read also Scrap PSLE, delay streaming and foster creativity
Observers, both at home and overseas, repeatedly point out that the rigid exam-oriented curriculum is antithetical to critical and creative thinking.
Education Minister (Schools) Ng Chee Meng sees the problem. He acknowledges that the system produces workers who are technically competent but “do not think out of the box and lack the derring-do to push boundaries”.
These traits, he noted, need to be nurtured from young. He exhorted pupils to chiong, the Hokkien vernacular for taking risks. “It’s a mindset,” he said. “An attitude of wanting to do better, find break-throughs, of wanting to innovate…taking into account the risks involved and doing it anyway.”
He warned of a rapidly changing world: “What has afforded success for one generation, may not for another.”
Mindful words, no doubt, but they remain, worryingly, words. He demonstrates no intention to revamp the education system. He doesn’t possess, in his own words, the derring-do to push boundaries.
When he finally roused himself to make changes, he declared that his ministry will discontinue the use of T-scores to rank PSLE results, ‘Achievement Levels’ will be used instead. The remedy is like applying Mopiko on a malignant tumour.
And get this, the switchover will only take place in 2021!
When a general exhorts his troops to chiong and he remains rooted behind the frontline, paralysed by fear, he runs the danger of being ignored.
Worse, his inaction jeopardises the nation’s future – a future that is already here.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

自雇人士收入补贴,交职总处理申请? 黄志明:有责任协助政府、关心工友

工人党主席林瑞莲昨日于国会内对有关自雇人士收入补贴计划提出质疑,职总秘书长黄志明回应表示,职总认为有责任协助政府为自雇人士和自由工作者提供援助,并且认为劳资政三方应该都有参与空间。 议员林瑞莲(阿裕尼集选区)昨天在国会提出质询,自雇人士收入补贴,所动用的资金是国家储备,为何人力部需要将申请工作“外包”给职总,而且职总又是以何种标准批准或拒绝申请。 目前自雇人士收入补贴计划(Self-Employed Person Income Relief Scheme,简称SIRS)总值12亿元,旨在为自雇人士提供为期九个月的现金补贴。如今已有10万名自雇人士自动符合条件,但却出现部分自雇人士因些微差异而无法通过符合条件。 因此,林瑞莲对此提出质疑并解释,目前出现一种状况,即部分未受影响的自雇人士则自动获得补贴,然而有些未通过符合条件者即使在向职总重新申请后也遭到拒绝,或是每月补贴从1000元被调低至800元,令他们感到不公平。 对此,职总秘书长黄志明回应,职总的介入,并非是为了插一脚,而是意识到身为劳资政伙伴,自己是有能力协助政府。职总对工友的关心也是促使黄志明果断答应财政部的请求,使职总出面执行自雇人士收入补贴计划。 黄志明认为,在疫情期间,劳资政应该团结一致共同对抗病毒,所以即使1000亿元是政府所提,但企业家、职总和员工都应该有参与的空间。 “如果劳资政三方不能团结起来共同对抗冠病,那我们将失去新加坡的独特优势。确实,1000亿元的预算案是政府提出的,但我认为,企业家、职总和员工都有参与的空间。”

Of concessions and tokenism, worrying trends in policy making

Archaic laws results on Govt doing strange things. By John Ang.

SAF regular dies after completing own physical training at Kranji Camp

A 39-year-old Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) regular serviceman died on Friday (26…

菲律宾独立媒体人网络诽谤案罪名成立 面临最高六年监禁

菲律宾独立媒体,拉普勒(Rappler )网站创办人蕾莎(Maria Ressa)日前涉嫌一起网络诽谤案,周一(15日)被马尼拉法院判罪名成立,将面临最高六年的监禁。 据彭博社(Bloomberg)报道,蕾莎因一篇2012刊登、2014年更新的报导而被控涉嫌网络诽谤。 该报道引用来源不明的机密资料,指涉一名商人涉嫌谋杀、人口贩卖与毒品走私,遭到该商人批评报道不实,涉嫌诽谤。 据美国有线电视新闻网菲律宾台,马尼拉法院周一裁定蕾莎诽谤罪名成立,判处她监禁六年。但蕾莎可以就裁决提起上诉。 蕾莎周末接受菲律宾媒体《ABS-CBN》新闻采访时表示,政府企图利用该官司扭曲司法。 蕾莎作为菲律宾新闻网站拉普勒的创办人,曾被时代杂志评选2018年的”年度人物”之一。 长久以来一直为菲律宾争取新闻自由,同年,她获得《保护记者组织委员会》(Committee to Protect Journalists)的新闻自由奖。…