photo; wikimedia.org

Mr Louis Ng Kok Kwang, Member of Parliament for Nee Soon GRC had asked the Minister for National Development, whether the Ministry will consider making it mandatory to educate prospective or current residents of ‘nature-inspired’ developments on the appropriate response to wildlife sighted in their areas and why members of the public should not feed wildlife.

In his response, Minister for National Development, Lawrence Wong wrote that it is important to carefully manage human-wildlife interactions to preserve Singapore’s wildlife.

Agencies like NParks and AVA are already taking active measures to do so:

  1. NParks organizes biodiversity programs like the Festival of Biodiversity and Community in Nature initiatives. Taken as a whole, these programs help to generate public awareness of, and appreciation for, our native wildlife.
Pangolin / photo: nparks.gov.sg.jpg
Pangolin / photo: nparks.gov.sg.jpg
  1. Agencies disseminate guidelines on how residents can minimise potential human-wildlife conflict, particularly in residential districts close to nature areas. For example, the guidelines touch on proper methods of securing trash bins and keeping food out of sight. Moreover, AVA officers conduct walkabouts in areas where residents have faced issues relating to animal nuisance. AVA officers also attend meetings to address residents’ concerns in these areas.
  2. NParks conducts specific outreach activities to discourage animal feeding. These include distributing advisory pamphlets to residents, conducting workshops for school children, and displaying prominent signage against wildlife feeding in parks and nature reserves.
Young students learn about our rich natural heritage in the Nature Keeper Programme / photo: nparks.gov.sg
Young students learn about our rich natural heritage in the Nature Keeper Programme / photo: nparks.gov.sg

Mr Wong explained that most residents who live close to nature areas behave very responsibly, have made adjustments, and appreciate the wildlife as part of their living environment.

NEL Lime butterfly / photo: nparks.gov.sg
NEL Lime butterfly / photo: nparks.gov.sg

But there will always be a small minority who persist in inappropriate behaviors like feeding, he continued, in these cases, a more targeted approach which may include official warnings or enforcement action is necessary.

However, it has been noted that the authorities somehow would overreact to resident complaints and would take extreme measures to resolve the matter. Such as the case of monkeys being trapped at Bukit Timah hill. It is only when non-government organisations like ACRES and other animal groups are involved, that the animal is not harmed. This was highlighted in a symposium in 2013.

Read: More education and legislation for animal welfare

The Minister had not answered the question of why members of the public should not feed wildlife but other sources explained that some of the reasons of the prohibition are:

  1. The increase in local concentrated wildlife population due to artificial feeding can promote the transfer of disease among animals or between animals and humans.
  2. Feeding can also alter animal behavior that the animals routinely travel in larger groups, which can make disease transmission between animals more likely.
  3. Artificial feeding can lead to animals aggressively seeking out food from people, sometimes resulting in injury.
  4. In public spaces, the congregation of animals caused by feeding can result in them being considered pests.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

PUB orders stop to clearance work at Bukit Batok BTO project after environmental violations

Singapore’s national water agency PUB has halted clearance work at a Built-To-Order (BTO) project in Bukit Batok Hillside Park after the contractor was found to have flouted environmental regulations. The contractor was ordered to stop site clearance work and construct proper cut-off drains with silt fences before resuming work. PUB will also take enforcement action against the contractor. Photos posted on social media by a member of the Nature Society (Singapore) sparked concerns among conservationists about the effectiveness of the environmental management and monitoring plan (EMMP) put in place to minimize the project’s harmful impact on the environment. Nature lovers have previously spoken up against the development of Bukit Batok Hillside Nature Park for residential needs.

MP Jamus Lim: Govt’s decision not to withdraw carbon taxes amid pandemic is an implicit admission that environmental tradeoffs in any discussion of policy

The Government’s decision not to withdraw carbon taxes amid coronavirus pandemic is…

Indonesian farmers fight for their land in nickel mining boom

Nickel mining in Indonesia, the world’s largest producer, is putting farmers’ land rights and the environment at risk, say residents and rights groups. The boom is driven by rising global demand for metals used in electric vehicle batteries and stainless steel. Dozens of nickel processing plants have sprung up across Sulawesi, home to black macaques, maleo birds and tarsier primates. Some villagers have confronted miners with machetes, while others have detained miners and set heavy equipment on fire. Chinese firms, which invested $8.2bn in Indonesia last year, are among the leading international investors.