A motorist, Aaron Rylan Facebook page shared a video from his dashcam at Bedok Stadium on 15 October at 14.06 pm, showing a boy on a bike used his car as a ramp and fleeing the scene immediately after the deed.

Aaron had posted the video in attempt to seek out the boy who had caused damage to his car. However, he said that he would not discuss the damage incurred on the social media and would rather to settle it privately.

Aaron said that he had lodged a report and investigations were ongoing.

He still, however, offered for the boy to come forward to settle the damages so everybody can continue with their lives.

He wrote at the end of his post, “Lastly my last request (Rationale Of This Posted Video) Friends, mothers, fathers, uncles and aunties to kindly educate your children to think before performing such Acts or at least Find A Vehicle Without An in-Car Camera!”

Eric Lee Chim Seng, a commenter on the video wrote, ” I view this case as vandalism. Similar to about 2 decades ago what Michael Fay has done graffiti to the cars. He was given caning. Meantime, with this publicity, let the public prosecutor take up and press the charges onto this bicycle rider. An apology must be made together and accompanied with the cost of the repair plus an adequate compensation for lost of usage. “…a pound of flesh has to be paid…” in accordance to Singapore Judicial System. Period.”

While Romi Sofhian wrote, “What if another car was parking and driver is renting without a dash cam. Just imagine the agony he need to go through by paying damages for someone else fools!! Hope they get arrested soon!”

Around five hours after the post was written, one of the Facebook user, Alvin Tan, identified a boy who was said to be the same person in the video. He compared the picture from the video and the picture from the boy’s Facebook page.

When asked whether he was sure that the boy is the same person, Alvin answered that he is sure according to his source.

14567968_10205307616528498_177155287307583108_n

Commenters wrote that the boy should be punished for what he did. He should be jailed or at least canned. Jei Siregar wrote, “I hope they find him. And I hope they cane him. Not jail him. Just cane him.”

Jinhe Ng wrote, “Settle the damages doesn’t help him. Let the law deal with him before he know how to behave himself.”

Some were harsher in their comments. Mirza Lazytoertentain wrote, “I’m sure they’d get their just desserts from their parents and the law (I hope their parents will punish them in a way they’d never forget). I would support a jail term for my kids if it would mean they’d learn their lesson and be prevented from turning into hooligans.
To willfully damage a very expensive piece of property means they’d have no qualms committing other ‘expensive’ crimes and offences. Better to teach a harsh lesson early than have them commit something in the future for which the consequences can be much bigger.”

Fortunately, on 16 October, Aaron posted another status update, saying that he had settled the issue privately with the boy, Izzad Adnaff, and his family.

He asked everybody’s attention to kindly respect Mr Izzad and his family after the said video had gone viral and thanked everybody for the help.

14656433_1139098546179199_1102841376276933754_n

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

We should not hesitate to drawdown further on national reserves for more COVID-19 support, says NCMP Leong Mun Wai

While the additional S$8 billion the Government is committing for further COVID-19…

人民协会:加强防疫措施 明日妆艺大游行如期举行

2020妆艺大游行主办单位官方脸书今日(30日)发通告,有关游行仍会如期在明日(1月31日)指2月1日举行。 通告称人民协会将监督情况,并与相关机构合作和更新资讯。当局表示将根据本地新型冠状病毒进展,酌量更动或取消活动。 人协表示现场将进行体温检测、投入更多医护人员到场协助。 “我们呼吁群众保持警惕,并维持良好个人卫生习惯,如有不适应立即就医和呆在家休息。”当局也指出如在活动现场有人出现不适,可立即寻求现场工作人员求助。 根据《8视界》报导,人协总执行理事长陈国明则表示,希望透过设立体温检测站等措施,能给观众安全感。表演者也每天有接受体温检测,表演当天也会量体温。 预计明后天的妆艺大游行,一天人流量可达到逾万人。

抵触《公共秩序法》被禁两周 行动艺术家施兰今获释

经历两周监禁,艺术家和社运分子施兰(Seelan Palay)于今日获释。在脸书上,他宣称他的艺术表演:“32年:镜子的审问”随着他的监禁划下总结。 在本月3日,新加坡法院判处施兰因在未获许可证下进行表演活动,触犯《公共秩序法》罪名成立,罚款2千500元,或监禁两周。而施兰选择了监禁的惩处。 他在未有代表律师的情况下,出席9月26日的法庭审讯。面对主控官的审问,施兰坚称其艺术表演全程以平和的方式进行,且没有告知、直到任何人追随他,从原表演地点国家艺术馆走到国会。 他也强调,表演他全程沉默,仅靠镜子来表达含义,以及针对警方的询问才作礼貌答复。 当主控官质问,其表演具有目的、是否影射政府当年监禁谢太宝的决策是错误的,施兰则回应,艺术本身并不必然有任何目的。 在去年10月,施兰独自一人站在国会前,举着“一面画有图案的镜子,批判政府前国会议员谢太宝遭囚禁和软禁32年,进行无声抗议。在警方劝离不果而被当场逮捕。 谢太宝在1966年在内安法令下被逮捕,被政府指控从事亲共、颠覆政府活动。结果,这名议员在未经审讯和起诉下,被监禁至1998年才重获自由。 ‘网络公民’以视频记录下施兰的和平抗议,后者并无作出多大的威胁,为了控诉对前国会议员谢太宝的不当囚禁待遇,只是拿着一面镜子站在艺术馆和国会前和平抗议。 他不曾干扰民众,也不曾反抗警方,然而施兰最终还是被逮捕了。逮捕施兰的行动,显示当权者无法容忍异议与民众的批判,也延续了司法的不公义。

余振忠回应黄循财:民间对权力制衡的渴求一直都在

续前日工人党党魁毕丹星回应行动党中委黄循财的言论,工人党前非选区议员余振忠,也发文强调,民间对于权力制衡的渴求一直都在,而不是新鲜事物。不仅仅如黄循财所说,因为工人党呼吁国会制衡、不要开出空白支票等引起选民共鸣。 他也回顾历史,1968年社阵(Barisan Socialis)抵制选举,行动党拿到“空白支票”,也使后者继续巩固绝对的主导地位,且严厉压制其他有意投身替代阵营的人才,“被流放、面对破产或拘留的这些人士不胜枚举,相信我也无需一一列举。” 不过直至1981年,工人党惹耶勒南成功打破行动党的绝对垄断,续而再有詹时中和刘程强陆续打入国会。当强大挑战崛起,行动党也曾差点丢失友诺士和静山集选区。 然而,即便面对恐惧氛围、行动党的强势主导,加之集选区制度、选区划分、市镇会等种种不利情况,在野党仍能作出突围而出,滴水穿石。 故此,余振忠认为,民间对于权力制衡的渴望一直都在。 再者,良才流入替代阵营的现象,不是最近一两天的事,早已出现了很长一段时间! 余振忠认为,工人党前党魁刘程强一步一脚印,建树一个受敬重和有能力的力量功不可没,使得现今有许多人更勇于站出来,相信在下届选举会有更多良才投身此志业。 当然也有社交媒体和受教育程度较高的选民的因素。 余振忠分析,2020选举中行动党在全国各地,面对不同政党的有力的挑战,“只有行动党会让你相信人才不愿参政,新加坡刚刚好只有团队A(应是意指行动党)(that Singapore only…