The Government has presented a White Paper in response to the Constitutional Commission’s Report on the Elected Presidency on Thursday (15 September).

The Constitutional Commission headed by Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon was tasked by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong to review three aspects of the Elected Presidency; the introduction of safeguards to ensure a president from a minority race, reviewing the qualifying criteria for presidential candidates and addressing the role of a council that advises the president on key decisions.

The White Paper stated that it declined the recommendation that the president should be chosen by the Parliament and emphasized that the president has to be appointed by the people to ensure he/she has the moral authority and mandate to veto the Government.

However, it accepted the key recommendation which said that the presidential candidates from the private sector must be at least CEOs of companies with $500 million or more of shareholders’ equality.

The recommendation which said that the Presidential Election would be reserved for a racial group if it is not represented for five terms is also accepted.

The recommendation which said that a more finely-calibrated approach for Parliament to override the President’s veto, taking into consideration the extent to which the CPA supports the veto was also declined.

However, the Government also agreed that members of Council of President Advisors (CPA) will be added from six to eight and that the president must consult CPA for all monetary issues related to reserves and all key public service appointments.

Netizens expressed their concern towards the issue. Some proposed that Singapore might just as well turn revert back into appointed President rather than continue with the Election.

Here are what they said :

  • Eugene Foo wrote, “Might as well no election let the PAP decide who get the hot seat, the requirements are too ridiculous,at least 50 million, people like Tan Cheng Bock and Tan Jee Say not even qualify, where to find such power candidates except PAP CHOSEN ONE!”
  •  Edrei Valath wrote, “I love how the government thinks that the populous is so dumb that everything, from CPF to presidential elections, needs to be condensed down to cute, little info graphs.
    Either that or they believe that the fewer info they give, the less people will question them. But again, that relies on their poor opinion of the populous.”
  • Gerald Tan wrote, “This is getting ridiculous. And the saddest/scariest thing is that the PAP, holding almost all the seats in Parliament can just amend the constitution to their heart’s content, no matter how much we disagree with it on the ground.”
  • Wendy Celine Ong wrote, “Let’s face it. Most of the questions are just distractions. The main issue is no 2. Should a president be a former/current senior executive of a company with shareholder equity of at least 500 million? Obviously, this is designed so that some people like Dr Tan Cheng Bock or Tan Jee Say cannot take part in the next presidential election.”
  • Nick Pedro wrote, “As an Indian, this is an overkill. It goes to tell that minorities need the Chinese support however since the time of British Indian Army, we were alone unchallenged and survived without help or assistance. We were road builders, port workers (air & sea), policemen, shop owners, tend to agricultural animals, aside being warriors. We were marginalized even today but we survived. We are the hardiest of all races because we survived in a region of other majorities. Today we have reached the highest level and appears as threats to the government, co-workers, and neighbors. We were called names but we are strong when we unite, fortunately, the need has not arrived. We can be the greatest friend but deadliest enemies. Our armed forces is based on the grit and fitness of Indian officers though we can go far, except for M S Gill. So in a nut case, we don’t need sympathetic pathetic support.”
  • Guo Xiongwei wrote, “Geez, the amount of work they put in to block TCB from contesting is IMPRESSIVE! If NEW PAP bothers as much on those lift maintenance, many residents would not be injured/DEAD from using their lifts. Does it take MONTHS to investigate why the lift was badly maintained by Pasir Ris-Punggol TC where the ah-pek DIED? So long to cover-up/whitewash the tragedy meh?
    As NEW PAP Chairman KBW put it, ‘in the good old days.'”
  • Henry Ace wrote, “By simply appoint them as chairman or CEO at any of the GLCs prior to elections, Pappy can easily make their candidates qualify. I would rather void my votes in future than to vote in a puppet.”
  • Jim Chua wrote, “this is,hilarious! the pledge already said, ‘regardless of races, etc,’ is not as Long as anyone, any race, who is capable enough to fit the bill?, the decision is still from the board of government members, if the primary choice is for the Indian race but a Malay and a Chinese race are the better choices, the member will still choose the best, not the race. Right?”
  • Sangha Vandana wrote, ” A redundant wayang news, all of us know it will surely accept even without the referendum, what else to expect!What can we do? The government is amending the constitution to exclude referendum for future insertion and amendments.”
  • Alfred Huang wrote, “How many companies out there have $500m shareholders’ equity? Of which, how many of their Most Senior Executives will want to run for Presidency? End up no one run, will be their own Kaki-Lang again.”

Dr Tan Cheng Bock who only lost to the current president by 0.35% of votes, had earlier announced his intention to contest in the upcoming Presidential Election in 2017. However, with the new proposed amendments in place. Dr Tan will be disqualified as a potential candidate in the next election.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

As we celebrate another successful SAF day, let’s not forget our comrades who have fallen behind

As Singapore celebrates yet another SAF day, we can be thankful for…

Is the Merdeka Generation package a vote buying bag of benefits or a tribute?

by Khush Chopra We are told the purpose or objective of the…

“前老板要我物色外籍人士履历!” 前人资主管揭职场聘雇秘辛

“我的前老板曾“强烈建议”我注意外籍人士的求职履历!” 我国聘雇外籍人士课题一直备受争议,PMET职场聘雇上存在歧视现象,更不是空穴来风。不久前人力部也承认,有47个雇主招揽雇员竟没有公平对待新加坡人,甚至多达30家金融、专业服务企业,聘请的外籍PMET(专业人士、经理、行政人员和技术人员),大部分来自同一国家! 然而,以上现象都还可能只是冰山一角。 近日,在社交媒体领英(Linkedin),培训和咨询公司ConnectOne的总监Joanne Yeoh,针对聘雇外籍人士的课题发文,指出近年来被要求招聘外籍人士而倍感困扰。 她表示,“这是相当悲哀的时代,我国公民在自己的国家面临聘雇歧视,如今需敦促聘请本地人才能确保职场多元化。” Joanne说,尽管欢迎不同外籍人士和外国投资进入新加坡,但聘雇歧视确实存在在我国已有一段时日。 她也举例,过去十年期间她作为公司的人力资源部主管,也曾遇过类似的聘雇歧视的经验。 “我有遇过一些老板,“强烈推荐”我先查阅外国人的履历,即使我当时面试的本地人都符合职缺条件。” 倡议打造以新加坡人为核心团队 “当我坚持要在公司内建立以新加坡人为核心的PMET团队,我也曾被刻上不服从的标签;我也曾参加过某次接班人规划的评议,外籍董事当场表示,“若没有亚洲人能够领导,而且将会成为一场大灾难”(P/S:我当机立断,也放弃大笔花红就辞职。)”” 不仅如此,她也曾参与由印度籍员工的商务会议,全程以印度语交流,而她忆述,她却是全场唯一的新加坡人。…

屠妖节燃放烟火 两嫌犯被逮捕

涉嫌在昨日(6日)凌晨于小印度格洛士特路非法燃放鞭炮,两名分别为29及48岁的嫌犯被警方逮捕。 根据警方文告,警方在上述路段发现有人燃放鞭炮后,不久即逮捕涉事者。 相信是为了欢庆屠妖节,涉事者在上述地带燃放鞭炮长达一分钟,也被网民拍摄短片上载社交媒体。影片末段可见有警察奔跑向烟花点燃处。 警方称目前仍在进行调查。 在我国《危险烟火法》下,严禁民众使用和拥有烟火,只有特定活动、安全标准等获得许可的情况下,才能使用。 燃放烟火的人一旦罪名成立,将面对2000元到1万元不等的罚款,或长达两年监禁,或两者兼施。