Source : YouTube.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong in his speech during the National Day Rally on Sunday (21 August) spoke on the importance of having a President to unite the people and that the recent survey commission by Channel News Asia and Insitute of Policy Studies showed that minorities would like to have a President of their own race.

He went on to call for the Chinese community in Singapore to support the move to ensure minorities are represented through the a President of a minority race.

Mainstream Media such as the Straits Times, Channel News Asia, and Today Online reiterated his speech on their platforms.

However, without any prompt from social commentaries on the matter, many voiced their disagreement in their comments on the posts especially on what this meant to the Presidential Candidacy of Dr Tan Cheng Bock.

Dr Tan announced his intention to stand for the President earlier this year on 11 March.

Here are some of what the netizens wrote :

  • Link Sng said, “To be honest, i`m ok with Indian/aMlay/Eurasian president. I`m really not sure what the PM is talking about. I sense that for the next presidential election, the criteria is the candidate must be a minority, thus ensuring that Tan Cheng Bock wont be able to participate.”
  • “Called for the Chinese Community to “Ensure” minority President? Sounds so wrong leh.. Since when does the race matters?We always vote for the President that we support for integrity and qualification.
    I will still vote for Dr Tan Cheng Bock who I have been supporting since years ago,” wrote Yue Ling.
  • “I think he meant not easy for a oppo non-chinese (or watever race) to be an mp,” wrote Simon Soh.
  • Phillip Lo wrote, “Since when did we change from meritocracy to racial bias? seems like some made up problem to distract us from what?”
  • “Just done my statistics on past PresidentsMalay 10.57% ( Mr. Yusof Ishak)
    Indian 30.83% ( Mr. Devan Nair, Mr. S. R. Nathan)
    Chinese 37.90% (Mr. Wee Kim Wee, Mr. Ong Teng Cheong, Mr. Tony Tan)
    Eurasian 20.70% (Mr. Benjamin Sheares)Thus I dont see how the current system is being unfair to minority group,” wrote Rayvest Toh
  • Jasohn Soh said, “Why does pm have so little faith in Singaporeans. Why are we moving backwards from a system of meritocracy back to playing the race card. I believe that the recent Bukit Batok elections have proven that Singaporeans are able to vote based on merit and ability rather then race. I think he underestimates us as a nation.”
  • Phua Koon Kee wrote, “Yusof Ishak, Benjamin Sheares, Devan Nair, Wee Kim Wee, Ong Teng Cheong, S.R.Nathan, Tony Tan. Four out seven Presidents are non Chinese. Why politicize the elected presidency? It smells of the government’s desperation, or fear for Tan Cheng Bock to unseat Tony Tan.
  • “As long as the future president have the citizens interests at heart and not only your own and that of your paymaster,then it is immaterial or best said ,pointless to have a presidential candidate or even a president from a certain minority group.enough of this racial politics or quota nonsense,” said Mohammad Saqib.
  • “Omg!! Why is it not easy?? Just because majority of population are Chinese & its hard for non Chinese MP to deal during meet up session ? There’s this thing called ‘translator’!! Its just a lame excuse! Tharman will make the next better PM anytime,” said Linda De Silva.
  • Zheng Quang said,”Smokescreen to distract the commoners from the real issues at hand.”
  • “He hinting we should not vote for mr Tan Cheng Bock lah,” wrote Cecil Tan.
  • Michael Ng wrote, “This is not good at all. Singapore will slowly doom if policy of races prevail. Meritrocacy is the only way moving forward.”
  • “Why play the race card? I thought our sg system is based on meritocracy? Meritocracy has no colours,” said WQ Ruth Chan.
  • “Priming fence sitters to not vote for tan cheng bok,” said Bay Hansen.
  • For the same reasons can we rotate the Prime Minister? At least for the president role, we had many different races represented before, but never for PM.. why?” asked Minsoon Lim.
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

传面临亏损新加坡自由港找买家 创办人拒回应

有“亚洲的诺克斯堡(Fort Knox)”之称的自由港(Le Freeport)据传即将出售。 据《彭博社》 报导,新加坡自由港,用来存放珍稀物品、黄金、古董和艺术品等,且保安措施严密,据称美国银行摩根大通(JPMorgan Chase & Co. )也有储藏黄金在此。 但自2017年,自由港业者(Yves Bouvier)伊夫博维耶,卷入与俄罗斯富豪的纠纷,便开始出售名下资产。 自由港于2010年以1亿新元(740万美元)创设,就坐落在樟宜机场旁,甚至有通道可直通机场跑道。高度的保安措施,使之有“新加坡的诺克斯堡(Fort…

One year of COVID-19 in Indonesia: Five key points from the global crisis

JAKARTA, INDONESIA — The COVID-19 pandemic has gripped the world for a…

Temasek blames misplaced belief in FTX founder and CEO Bankman-Fried for its failed US$275m investment

SINGAPORE — Temasek Holdings issued a statement yesterday (17 Nov 2022) to announce that…

李显扬一家出席“粉红点”集会

步入第11个年头的同性恋平权活动“粉红点”(Pink Dot)集会今日(29日)下午5时在芳林公园举行。而主办当局脸书专页则分享,总理弟弟李显扬一家一同出席活动的合照。 李显扬儿子李桓武与伴侣Heng Yirui医生,刚在上月24日于南非开普敦结婚,引来国内外各界人士瞩目。 而在今日的“粉红点”活动,李桓武和伴侣,父亲李显扬、母亲林学芬以及Heng Yirui医生父母都到场出席,为活动增添亮点。 大多网民留言较为正面,除了表达祝福之外,一些性少数群体也感谢李显扬一家的出席,认为这是最实际的支持,具有重大意义,也意味着家庭成员间也能展现包容态度。 早在去年7月,李桓武就公开在脸书和伴侣合照,并表态支持第10届“粉红点”活动: 早前,总理李显龙曾表示,刑事法典377A条“”仍“将保留在法律中一段时期”,但不代表新加坡会将性少数族群(LGBTQ)边缘化,犹如刑法第377A条并不阻止粉红点每年的聚会。 不过,也有许多性少数群体和性别平权人士仍呼吁,应该先废除377A条文,并且多聆听他们的意见,才可能保障该群体平等权益、能受本地社会的接纳和免受歧视。 根据我国刑事法典第377A节条文,男性同性性行为属犯罪行为,一旦罪名成立可被判监禁长达两年。 不过,对于同性恋者,已故建国总理李光耀生前也曾表明不同意见。…