Peace Palace in The Hague (Source : justicehub.org)

China has asked Singapore to respect its decision to ignore the Permanent Court of Arbitration in the Hague ruling made on 12 July 2016 .

The court ruled that China has no legal basis to claim historic rights to resources within the sea areas falling within the ‘nine-segment line’. The contested area in the South China Sea includes the Paracel Islands, the Spratly Islands, and various other areas including the Pratas Islands, the Macclesfield Bank and the Scarborough Shoal.

The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Hua Chunying said China had made its position on the issue very clearly.  “The related ruling is illegal, invalid and has no binding force,” she said in a statement on 5 August.

“China hopes that Singapore can maintain an objective and fair position as the coordinator of China and Asean dialogue relations, so as to advance Sino-Singapore relations and healthy and stable China-Asean ties.”

The statement was made in response of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s comments at a reception hosted by the United States Chamber of Commerce and US-Asean Business Council in Washington on Tuesday, Singapore time.

He stated that every claimants, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei, Taiwan, and China want to go for a war over the dispute.

Mr Lee said, “They have interests, they have claims, they would want to maintain them, but nobody wants to go to war,” he had told US officials and business leaders.

Despite the fact that Singapore needs to maintain a good relationship with China, the country has to be careful of its stance taken on this matter.

On 14 February 1980, Singapore protested against the publication in 1979 by Malaysia of a map depicting the island as lying within Malaysia’s territorial waters.  It further observes that the dispute as to sovereignty over Middle Rocks and South Ledge crystallized on 6 February 1993, when Singapore referred to the two features in the context of its claim to Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh during bilateral negotiations.

And in 2008, Singapore and Malaysia went to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the Hague, to fight over the sovereignty of Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks and South Ledge.

In its Judgment, which is final, binding and without appeal, ICJ decided on 23 May 2008, that Singapore has sovereignty over Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh; that Malaysia has sovereignty over Middle Rocks; and that sovereignty over South Ledge belongs to the State in the territorial waters of which it is located.

Tommy Koh, Ambassador-At-Large at Singapore’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs wrote in an op-ed at Straits Times, saying that states in South and South-East Asia have settled disputes through the international legal process and China should do likewise, and consider consensual methods such as mediation.

Mr Tommy emphasized that there are three points to conclude in the South China Sea dispute :

First, Asians want their region to be peaceful, stable and prosperous. They want the rule of law to be strong and for all disputes between states to be settled peacefully, in accordance with the law and not on the basis that might is right.

Second, with the exception of China, Asians do not have a negative attitude towards settling their disputes by arbitration or adjudication. China should, therefore reconsider its position in order to conform to the best Asian and international practice.

Third, in addition to arbitration and adjudication, there should be considerations on several consensual, win-win, methods of dispute settlement, such as fact-finding, mediation, conciliation and joint development.

While the bodies that decided on the South China Sea and Pedra Branca are different, although the general principle about the rule of law and accepting international law still stands.

Bear in mind that Singapore was awarded ownership of the reef through ICJ’s decision, therefore if Singapore decides to support China in disregarding the ruling, how would other countries (especially Malaysia) view the ruling that Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh belongs to Singapore?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

坐拥95亿元储备金 读者:国大欠人民一个解释

上月28日,本地媒体揭发新加坡国立大学坐拥95亿储备金,在去年3月底结束的财政年度中,收到2亿2700万元捐款,并赚取6亿200元的投资收入,成为我国最成功的筹款机构。 报导引起民间关注,此前亦有民众质疑,大学如果已拥有大量储备金,不明白大学还需要捐款者捐献的原因。“慈善捐款的饼就这么大,如果拿下一大块,就意味着留给其他慈善机构的就不多了。到底捐款和储备金,要多少才算足够?” 旅居台湾的博客鄞义林也曾评述,政府资助这些公共大学,但新加坡本地学府也是征收最贵学费的地区之一。 “换言之,国人已经为教育缴纳足够的税赋,然而行动党政府还要人民承担更多学费(全球第五贵),这些学府赚有盈余,反观不少毕业生毕业后需面对负债,这公平么?” 对于这些质疑声音,此前国大发言人曾解释,大学利用储备金赚取投资收入,用于资助不同的运作费,如奖学金、支持研究和推广企业化;大学也需要继续筹款让储备金处于健康水平,才能加强长期的财务可持续性。 在本月22日,再有另一读者陈文发(译音)在《海时》撰文,再度质疑国大坐拥的巨额储备金,理应用来应对学费增长的问题;也认为国大欠人民一个解释,究竟累积95亿元储备金要作何用? 他指出,一般非政府组织的标准是累积两年的储备,但国大的储备难道没有限制?他也吁请国大应暂停募款,直至其储备降至一定数额位置。 对此,国大高级副教务长陈清贤教授特别在《海时》论坛答复陈文发的质问,解释截至去年3月31日财年,95亿储备金的架构: 其中有59亿元是捐赠基金(Endowed funds) 特定用途的非捐赠金捐献约八亿元 累计运营盈余28亿元(占30巴仙)…

美国涉暴力执法警察 与受害非裔男曾是同事!

据美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)报导,明尼苏达州一家俱乐部的经营者表示,涉嫌过度执法,导致非裔男子弗洛伊德死亡的警员沙文,两人过去曾是同事! 前雇主玛利亚称,她的俱乐部经营的17年里,上述两人都曾在她店里工作过。当不在警局值班时,沙文以兼职方式到他店里打工。 “沙文在(店)外面,而弗洛伊德在店里面做保安。” 玛丽亚称,不确定双方是否认识,但在不同时段里都会一起工作。她也称赞弗洛伊德是个“很棒的小伙子”,经常笑脸迎人。 当看到弗洛伊德被制伏的影片,“我不理解我所见到的,我一直对著我的手机大喊,叫沙文放开他。这太可怕了。这完全无法用言语来表达,而且(我)认识沙文。 我不敢相信他会没人性到无视这个人的乞求,为了他的一口气和他的生命(的请求)。” 沙文是于上周五被逮捕,其后被起诉三级谋杀罪及过失杀人罪,目前已被革职。

Learning according to capabilities, not age

By Jenn Lee – Since PM Lee’s National Day Rally speech exhorting…

SAF Terrex ICVs back in the Republic

Ministry of Defence (MINDEF) has announced that the nine Singapore Armed Forces…