Photo from http://www.hometeamvolunteers.gov.sg/

In its audit report for Financial Year 2015/2016 published on 26 July, the Auditor-General Office (AGO) found that the Singapore Police Force (SPF) had overpaid its Volunteer Special Constabulary (VSC) officers allowance amounting to about $2.63 million from 1 April 2008 to 31 December 2015.

AGO notes that SPF had been paying its VSC officers a revised allowance rate of $3.60 per hour since 2008. This is $0.80 higher than the rate stipulated in the Police (Special Constabulary) Regulations (Cap. 235, Rg 3).

Under the regulation, special police officers attending any parade (any period of training, duty or attendance of not more than 4 hours) shall each be paid an allowance of $2.80 per hour.

AGO states that the Deputy Commissioner of Police and Permanent Secretary (Home Affairs) who approved this revised rate were not authorised under legislation to do so.

The revised allowance rate resulted in overpayments totalling $2.62 million during the period 1 April 2008 to 31 December 2015.

In addition, AGO’s test checks of 30 payments of allowance during the period 1 April 2014 to 31 May 2015 revealed overpayment in all the cases.

These overpayments totalling $10,560 arose as SPF paid allowance for VSC duty beyond the four-hour cap stipulated in the Regulations, and paid pro-rated allowance for VSC duty below an hour which is not permitted under the Regulations.

In response to the findings, SPF acknowledged the lapse in not seeking the Minister’s approval to amend the Regulations.

SPF also indicated that it has since initiated action to amend the Regulations to regularise the overpayments, and to provide for payment of allowances to VSC officers for the full period of their duty.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

S’pore needs to prepare for “possible spike” in COVID-19 cases; only “the most serious cases” should be hospitalised: PM Lee Hsien Loong

While the COVID-19 situation in Singapore is still “under control”, the nation…

Will Siew Kum Hong get another term?

Most prolific among all non-PAP MPs but will he be NMP again?

“预告调消费税避免被炒作” 王瑞杰称明年财案透露援助配套细节

在昨日(10日)举行的在行动党65周年党大会上,副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰,以行动党第一助理秘书长身份发表演说,声称政府将在明年财政预算案,公布消费税援助配套细节,提早减缓人们对日后消费税率调高的担忧。 他强调上述配套“不是大选红包”,因为只会在下一任政府任期,消费税调高后才会发放。而他表示尽管调高消费税不受欢迎,“但如果我不提,反对党会提,因此直接从我这边听到比较好”。 他认为等大选过了才宣布调高消费税是“不诚实做法”,提早宣布能让企业和人民都有所准备,不隐瞒艰难的事实,才是诚信。 总理在致词时也指出即便政策不讨好,也要和选民诚实交代,“就拿消费税来说,很少政府会在大选前告诉你要调高税率,我大可推迟决策,或留给未来总理来解决,但我们必须做正确和负责任的事。” 王瑞杰在去年2月宣布,未来消费税将从目前的7巴仙,调高到9巴仙。他当时表示,许多领域的开支都会增加,尤其是医疗保健、基础设施和安保。 他自称调高消费税是“艰难决定”,为了应付需求,必须及早规划,未雨绸缪。“我们必须在开支上保持谨慎,尽可能节省开支,并增加收入,但需要以公平、累进的方式进行。” 他也在不同场合捍卫调高消费税的决定,其中在今年6月的一项对话会上,更声称如果我国没有这些年来累积的稳健储备,消费税调涨就不只增加两巴仙而已,可能还要调至至少15巴仙。 政府驳斥2015年大选后调高消费税流言 回顾2015年临近大选前,曾有流言指政府将在大选后增加税收。时任副总理兼财政部长尚达曼曾就此抨击反对党“危言耸听”,反驳政府已采取增加财政收入措施,保证未来五年,每年有40亿元可应付各种社会开支。 在政府网站的一篇誌期2015年8月6日的文章,也反驳坊间指政府打算在1015年大选后调高消费税的流言。文章指政府采取有效措施,包括把淡马锡控股所赚取的回报,也纳入国家储备净投资回报(Net Investment Returns,简称NIR)中;调高个人所得税上限等。…

院方病患跟进系统存严重缺陷 妇女起诉樟宜综合医院上诉得直

上诉法院星期二(2月26日)判定,若不是樟宜综合医院(CGH)的疏忽,肺癌病患的病情能够更早被诊断出来,并提早接受治疗,推翻了此前高等法院的判决。 关于医院应该支付给诺阿兹林(Noor Azlin Abdul Rahman,39岁)的赔偿金问题,则交由高等法院,由法官洪素燕进行评估。 法官鼓励院方寻求和解 在宣布以上判决时,上诉庭法官潘文龙指出,诺阿兹林的病情已经处在第四阶段,鼓励樟宜医院考虑与病患达成和解。 在新加坡大法官梅达顺以及上诉庭法官朱迪柏拉卡斯陪同下,潘文龙指出,“她(诺阿兹林女士)将因为身体状况,继续面临身心灵上的挑战,我们认为友好和解,将有助于(她)结束纠纷,能更专注于对抗癌症病毒和尽可能地恢复”。 “在我们看来,基于我们发现樟宜医院的疏忽,导致推迟诊断(诺阿兹林)患有肺癌,因此我们觉得作为权宜之计,院方应该有可能的解决方案。” 起诉医院和三名医生 诺阿兹林是在2012年2月被诊断患有肺癌。 她起诉樟宜医院和三名医生,因为2007至2011年,她都接受了这三名医生的治疗。诺阿兹林认为是医生的疏忽,导致延迟了她的癌症检测,失去了更好的治疗机会。有关控诉于2018年2月遭高等法院驳回,但是她提出了上诉。…