Meritocracy; a society where the citizen is rewarded not on the basis of his last name or his connections, but purely on his own merit.

Meritocracy has always been a core tenant of many Government speeches and Social Studies textbooks. In 2012, Prime Minister Lee reminded the members of his party of the role meritocracy plays in our society.

“I ask myself if we’re not going on merit, what are you going to look at?”

Cutting to the chase in a speech addressed to more than 1,600 People’s Action Party (PAP) activists, PM Lee noted, “You have a choice. You can look at wealth – they got money, you give them. You want that? You have another choice. You have connections, you give them. Some countries do that. I don’t think that’s the Singapore you want.”

One could go so far as to argue that Meritocracy is the bedrock of the Singapore Story. However, some material from a Workforce Skills Qualification (WSQ) course – courses sponsored by the Government in a bid to improve labour mobility – seemed to suggest that the Workforce Development Authority (WDA) may have missed a memo.

retrenchment

The picture above was an assessment that all participants of a WSQ Course on ‘Consensus and Managing Conflicts’ had to attempt. Participants were tasked to look at 10 employers of a company and eventually reach a decision which 4 to retrench. As for the 10 employees, not much details were given as far as their actual value to the company (read: merit) was concerned.

Instead, participants were told about their Political Affiliations, Sexual Orientations and Racist tendencies, to name a few arguably irrelevant traits.

Garywho first posted the course materials on his Facebook, described the course material as ‘atrocious’.

“Retrenchment should only be based on one’s work performance. This assessment scenario is not only against our values of meritocracy, it is extremely amoral and discriminatory. I have no idea what the course instructor is trying to teach here.”

A friend of his was allegedly failed by the Instructor for his refusal to participate in the assessment which he felt to be ‘shoddy’ and irrelevant.

retrenchment 2
Course participants to fill in their “justifications” based on the “merits” of the said individuals to be retrenched.

He went on to urge the WDA to keep a closer eye on the outsourcing of courses to ensure quality. Moreover, he submitted that the WDA ought to fulfill its due diligence by ensuring, at the very least, that the course materials and syllabus are in line with the values of the workforce at large.

The Government argues that “WSQs are based on national standards developed by WDA in collaboration with various industries.” In light of the WSQ Course material, one could argue that it was indeed a slip-up by the outsourced instructor and not a reflection of employment practices at large.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Reactions to the the expulsion of Dr Poh Lee Guan from the Workers' Party

~by Cheong Yaoming~ Dr Poh Lee Guan, a long serving Council Member…

Singapore netizens sense ulterior motive to Malaysia’s ban of fish export in Jan-Feb 2019 though ban extends to all trade partners

The Malaysia government has announced that they will be seizing the export…

同一笔账竟报销两次! 居委会前高级经理遭判监12周

巴西立居民委员会(RC)一名前选区高级经理,被指同一笔帐却向两个区的居委会主席报销两次,他对两项欺诈控状认罪,被判监禁12周,其他两项控状尚待酌量。 37岁的李轩伟(译音),声称自己自掏腰包支付活动供应商的费用。原本在获得第七区居委会主席签署支票、付款后,再转向第八区副主席申请报销!他为此获得四张支票总值5千919.27元的款项。 李轩伟是在2008年3月加入人民协会成为选区经理,较后升任巴西立第七区和第八区的居委会高级经理。不过目前已不在居委会任职。 2015年10月,建屋发展局协同巴西立-榜鹅市镇会,以及该区居委会着手社区翻新计划,改善选区内的设施。计划是获得政府全额拨款的,由市镇会落实。 翻新计划必须征求75巴仙居民同意,而第七、八区居委会便负责办活动向居民讲解计划细节,寻求支持。 李轩伟在2018年3月3日办了一场一日活动,他联系供应商并准备付款凭单、支票等证明文件,在获得第七区居委会主席签署支票后,便付款给供应商。 然而,李轩伟之后又再拿同样的付款凭单,欺瞒第八区居委会副主席拉吉夫(Rajeev Divakaran Nair),自己是自掏腰包先支付供应商,而二度申请报销! 他在2018年4月19日,欺瞒拉吉夫自己支付了气球造型商504元、购买袋子1千016元。拉吉夫信以为真,便支付他共1千521元。 同年7月4日,李轩伟又欺瞒拉吉夫,声称自己支付一笔2199元的款项,又再索求报销。 当然事件最后东窗事发,巴西立东选区办公室在同年4月查账时,发现这起欺瞒行为,该区总监找李轩伟对质,后者终于承认在第七区和第八区都做了两次重复报销,最终总监决定报警揭发此事。…