Teo Soh Lung, a lawyer and former Internal Security Act (ISA) detainee under Operation Spectrum in 1987, was one of the two individuals who were called to assist the police in the investigation of alleged violations of Cooling Off Day regulations at the Cantonment Police Station, around 10am on Tuesday, 31 May 2016.

Teo said that the police questioned her about her Facebook post made on Cooling Off Day, asking about the number of likes, who her visitors are, what she usually posts about, whether she thinks her post can influence the way people vote. Teo told the police that the Parliamentary Elections Act applies to political parties and candidates, not citizens like her, who have a constitutional right to post what they like on Facebook.

Instead of being allowed to leave the police station following her two hour interview, Teo was escorted by 7-8 police officers back to her residence to search for evidence relating to her alleged offence.

About five friends were there at her residence, accompanying Teo when the officers went through her belongings without a search warrant.

Lawyer Remy Choo recalled his experience of the incident as he arrived at Teo’s residence on Tuesday at about 2.20 p.m. He wrote that 7–8 police officers were in the midst of seizing her handphone, desktop and laptop when he arrived.

The investigating officer (IO), Angie Ng, was asked why the police had to seize Teo’s electronic devices given that Teo was not disputing the publication of the articles on her personal Facebook page on Cooling Off day.

Choo further pointed out that Teo was willing to cooperate with the police by giving them all the necessary information relating to the offence under the Parliamentary Elections Act which was being investigated.

The response from the IO was, “This is an arrestable offence, and we do not need to tell you how we conduct our investigations.”

Video of the police conducting the search at Teo Soh Lung’s house

Two individuals claiming to be police officers without pass.

After Choo pointed out politely but firmly that it was disproportionate to seize Teo’s personal electronic devices which contained personal data, another officer mentioned to Choo that he could be charged with obstructing investigations.

At the end of the search, the police seized one desktop computer, one laptop and one mobile phone belonging to Teo. The police said that Teo was not required to follow them back to the station. Ngerng, who also had his residence raided, had to follow the police back to the station.

Choo noted that Teo was visibly shaken by the entire spectacle. She was particularly upset that the police had to take her laptop, which had nothing related to the Facebook posts on it.

Choo commented on his Facebook post:

“I was disappointed with the police action. The seizure of a person’s electronic devices is gravely disruptive to their personal lives, and that these devices contain large amounts of personal private data irrelevant to the investigation. I would have thought the police could give a proper explanation as to why they needed to go to such extremes, especially given the fact that these are essentially ‘political’ offences under the Parliamentary Elections Act.

Soh Lung is a fiercely passionate social and political activist, but why must she be treated like a criminal, hell bent on concealing evidence from the police? She’s a former practicing lawyer and council member of the Law Society!”

Choo also said that he has written to the police to ask that her electronic devices be returned as soon as possible, upon her provision of any information or material which is relevant to investigations which he believes to be a reasonable request and should be acceded to.

He further noted that there was no such extreme action being taken against politicians who were alleged to have breached Cooling Off day regulations and asked about the need to use such a heavy hand against individuals posting on their personal Facebook pages.

Some individuals have speculated that the seizure of personal electronic devices may be part of a fishing expedition by the authorities to seek out “incriminating” information that might lead to other charges.

Read : Stark contrast in police enforcement of Cooling Off Day regulations

Under the Parliamentary Election Act, any person who is found guilty of violating the cooling off day regulation will be fined for a sum of not exceeding $1,000 or to imprisoned for a term not exceeding 12 months or to both.

Subscribe
Notify of
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

AWARE calls on Viswa Sadasivan to make a full and unreserved apology

AWARE Singapore has issued a follow-up statement in relation to to the…

周三才抵狮城 博客亚新明在植物园办见面会

来自以色列的网络旅游博客亚新(昵称Nas)在本周三(18日)抵达新加坡准备安家落户后,旋即宣布将在明日下午4时至6时,在新加坡植物园召开粉丝见面会,免费入场。 见面会将在坡植物园靠近地铁站生态湖(Eco Lake)的草坪举行。现场到时将设有一个舞台和扩音系统,他的团队同时也会送出限量版“Nas Daily 新加坡”T恤。 “期待跟你们见面,还有感谢你们所有人的热情欢迎,我们已经有在家的感觉。”Nas在贴文中这么向粉丝喊话。 截至今天傍晚六时许,有关活动在脸书的布告显示,有3370表示会参加,一万人感兴趣出席亚新的见面会。 预计三千人出席 不过,也有声音质疑,在短时间内举办预计有超过三千人出席的见面会,是否有向警方等相关部门申请准证。 对此,《亚洲新闻台》拨电向亚新确认,后者则宣称“所有从相关准证已经获准,我们也与警方和植物园当局对话,确保活动顺利进行。” 他补充:“我深受新加坡吸引到原因之一,是因为这里做什么都井井有条,周六的活动相关事项进展迅速且有条理。” 不过,他未向《亚洲新闻台》透露他申请了什么准证。他表示,若有两千人出席会很高兴,说明活动很成功。…

‘I do not have enough to buy food’ – poverty in the land of plenty

How many Singaporeans know about the poor living amongst us?