The Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) has published a statement on its Facebook page, to address the case of late PTE Lee Rui Feng Dominique Sarron. This comes after the viral post by PTE Lee’s mother on the lawsuit that was struck out by the High Court on 3 March 2016.

Below is the statement by SAF in full
The SAF offers our deepest condolences to the family of the late PTE Lee Rui Feng Dominique Sarron. We are deeply sorry for the untimely and tragic loss, and the anguish and distress brought to his family. We respect the wishes of the family to determine the reasons behind PTE Lee’s death. When any of our soldiers are injured or killed, the SAF will do its utmost to determine the cause and improve our safety standards to prevent any recurrence. Those responsible through their rash and negligent acts will be held accountable under our Military Court and Criminal Law Courts.
On 3 March, the High Court struck out the lawsuit filed by the family of the late PTE Lee against the SAF and the two officers involved in the incident. To clarify issues that have risen in response to this judgement, we set out the key findings as determined by the Committee of Inquiry (COI) in 2012 and the Coroner’s Inquiry (CI) in 2013.
CORONER’S FINDINGS
The CI was an open hearing that had provided for all interested parties to make their representation, including the family of the late PTE Lee. At the conclusion of hearings, the coroner found that PTE Lee had “died from acute allergic reaction to zinc chloride due to inhalation of zinc chloride fumes”. The coroner also found that this acute allergic reaction was “unlikely to have been predicted”.
The coroner noted that more smoke grenades than necessary were used during the exercise, but could not ascertain whether the acute allergic reaction was due to concentration and/or the mere exposure of zinc chloride fumes.
The coroner also noted that PTE Lee “had under played and under declared his asthmatic condition”. None of the other asthmatics in the same platoon reported any adverse outcome from the exercise or exposure to the smoke.
Smoke grenades which produce zinc chloride fumes have been in use by many militaries, including the SAF since the 1970s. PTE Lee’s death directly attributable to zinc chloride inhalation is the first on the SAF’s records in over thirty years of use.
COMMITTEE OF INQUIRY’S FINDINGS
The independent COI, convened by the Armed Forces Council, found that the number of smoke grenades discharged and the distance between the smoke grenades were not in accordance with the limits and minimum distance specified in the Training Safety Regulations. The COI also noted that PTE Lee’s medical classification and vocational assignment were in line with guidelines, and that medical aid rendered was timely, proper and adequate. These full findings of the COI were presented in Parliament through a Ministerial statement in 2012, including the actions taken to address safety lapses.
LIABILITY FOR ACTIONS
We would also like to address the misperception that SAF servicemen injured or killed cannot seek legal recourse under military rules. This is incorrect. SAF personnel can be charged and punished in the criminal courts for Penal Code offences of committing rash and negligent acts, even during the course of their military duties. The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC), not the SAF, decides if the evidence warrants this course of action. For example, in 2004, four servicemen were charged in court for causing the death of another serviceman during combat survival training. More recently, a senior instructor was charged and convicted of instigating a full-time National Serviceman to commit a rash act, and attempting to pervert the course of justice. The jeep overturn incident resulted in the death of a full-time National Serviceman. In both cases, the servicemen responsible were found guilty, and sentenced to imprisonment.
In PTE Lee’s case, the Coroner found that PTE Lee had died of an unforeseen acute allergic reaction to the smoke grenade fumes. As PTE Lee’s acute allergic reaction to the smoke grenades thrown by the Platoon Commander was not reasonably foreseeable, no criminal charges were brought against the two officers.
The SAF has however taken administrative and disciplinary action against the two officers. While the CI and COI did not find that the two officers were directly responsible for PTE Lee’s death, the two officers were summarily tried in 2013 for negligent performance of lawful order or duty, found guilty, and punished according to military law.
IMPROVEMENTS TO SAFETY
The SAF had since 2012 taken several measures to strengthen training safety across the whole SAF. This included the setting up of a Safety and Systems Review Directorate, the convening of a Respiratory Medicine Specialist Advisory Board to review medical classification on Asthma, and the deploying of more safety officers on the ground as full-time Unit Safety Officers. New N452 smoke grenades were also introduced to replace the smoke grenades used in that training exercise.
SUPPORT FOR THE FAMILY OF PTE LEE
Before the most recent suit, the family of PTE Lee had previously taken out a pre-action discovery application, which they subsequently withdrew. The court had awarded costs to MINDEF, but MINDEF had waived the legal costs.
MINDEF and the SAF have been extending help to PTE Lee’s family throughout this period, and remain committed to assisting and providing support to the family. Since the incident, welfare grants have been disbursed, and an offer of compensation has been made to the family, based on the full extent allowed by the compensation legislation. To respect privacy and maintain confidentiality, compensation amounts are not disclosed, but are generally two to four times that of amounts provided under the Work Injury Compensation Act for incidents arising from training and operations.
Once again, the SAF offers our sincere condolences to the family of PTE Lee. The SAF values the life of every soldier and recognises that we are responsible for the sons of Singapore placed under our charge. We will uphold safety standards while ensuring that we build a strong National Service force able to defend Singapore.
Brigadier General Chan Wing Kai
Commander Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC)

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Credit Card Choices Show More People are Making Informed Decisions

Malaysians Want Tit for Tat: Credit Card Choices Show More People are…

受害者包括我国少年 旅居狮城澳洲男子性侵47男童

一名旅居本地的澳大利亚籍男子波利斯(Boris Kunsevitsky),于昨日在澳洲墨尔本维多利亚高庭承认多项罪状,包括25宗在澳洲以外多地与孩童发生性行为,以及12项诱拐儿童发生性行为、拍摄儿童色情等罪状。 当地媒体谴责波利斯为该国迄今为止最严重的性犯罪者,将面临数十年的监禁,目前仍待法庭判刑。 波利斯2000年至2017年在新加坡工作,也以公干名义频繁到东南亚各国走动。他被指16年来,向至少47名男孩伸魔爪。 其中他还拍摄3千300张照片以及和至少25名受害者发生性关系的视频,并将之放上网。 波利斯今年52岁,波利斯出生于俄罗斯,在12岁迁居澳洲。 受害的儿童年龄介于10-15岁,大部分受害儿童来自菲律宾贫穷阶层、一名来自印尼、澳洲、甚至还包括本国男童。 德国警方在网上发现波利斯的视频,通知澳洲警方,后者于2016年展开调查。 2017年,波利斯回国探亲时遭当局拦截,并从其手机搜出证据,为此警方不准被告回到新加坡,并决定将他在新加坡的个人物件运回澳洲。 警方从被告的笔记型电脑和两个硬盘,发现被告最早从2001年开始摄录视频,此外,还下载3万7000其他受害者遭性虐的视频与照片。 借公干为名展开“性旅程” 当地法庭被告知波利斯被捕后确诊有恋童癖,一开始以销售工作为由,之后代表医疗设备公司到东南亚多国公干,实则进行“性旅游”。…

NUS to strengthen policy for sexual misconduct cases and introducing training courses for staff and students

Following several recent sexual misconduct cases involving faculty members and a review…

网传视频揭鸽子被诱杀惹议

数只鸽子似乎是吃了某些食物后,开始在地上挣扎,飞不起来。有数人站在不远处的树下,看到大部分鸽子飞不起来了,就戴上面罩,将鸽子捡起来,一一丢到黑色大垃圾袋内处理掉。网传的这段视频引来网民纷纷关注,其中有反对诱杀手段者,也有赞成的一群。 昨日,关爱动物研究协会(ACRES)上载了一段有关诱杀鸽子的视频,引起网民注意。 有关的视频也接合了脸书用户Suraiyah K Abdulla于2018年9月上载的诱杀鸽子视频,并表示有关的诱杀行为非常不人道,令人感到不安。 视频中除了看见人们将无法动弹的活鸽子,装入黑色大垃圾袋内,也可见到他们或扫、或踢地将鸽子装进簸箕内。 食用了毒药的鸽子大部分都无法逃离被捕捉的命运,只有疑似食用较少有毒物品的鸽子得以逃离被消灭的命运。 网民对有关的诱杀行动感到震惊和愤怒,纷纷在社交媒体上表达他们的不满和难以置信。 “诱杀鸽子是不对的,但是可以考虑不要饲养鸽子。我住家附近都是鸽子的繁殖地和排泄场所,因为有一批不体谅的人士正在喂养这些鸽子。” 为他人想想 但是,部分网民则觉得这是不得不进行的工作。因为一些鸟类可能是病原带菌体,且粪便不清理也会导致污染环境和水的卫生。 “鸽子四处觅食,它们身上可能携带诸如禽流感、H5N1等病菌。试想像这些携带病菌的鸟类到小贩中心的桌上觅食的情况。你的免疫系统若不够强壮,你最终将会生病。想象一下那些体弱的小孩和老人们。”