In what is already turning out to be a controversial initiative one day after it was announced, Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund, the Government Investment Corporation of Singapore, or GIC Pte Ltd, is handing out cash grants to students who do volunteer work for 25 hours.
Called “GIC Sparks & Smiles (GIC Sparks)”, the programme “seeks to inspire and enable youths in Singapore to play a positive and active role in their communities”, the company says on its website.
The programme is open to over 500 students across six universities, five polytechnics and the Institute of Technical Education (ITE).
“To receive it, GIC is looking for students who show the desire to serve the community, as well as demonstrate a need for financial support,” the announcement says. “The students who receive the GIC Sparks study grant commit to providing at least 25 hours of community service including mentoring. They will get exposure to range of experiences, skills and opportunities to enable them to volunteer and give their time in a way that makes a difference.”
GIC plans to give S$2,000,000 worth of community service grants to these students over a four-year period – but only students from households with a per capita income of below $2,000 will qualify for the programme.
It is unclear why there is such a cap.
GIC says it “is working closely with its charity partner Beyond Social Services (Beyond) to deliver the programme.”
“Beyond provides the students with mentorship training and connects each of them to a disadvantaged child, youth or family. Acting as facilitators or mentors, the students must build a relationship so they can make a difference through the act of doing. The activities done together can include tutorship, mentoring or facilitating conversations about key issues such as employment or education.”
Reaction to the scheme has been critical.
Ms Leena Kumari, posting online, said, “I personally feel this idea takes away the actual meaning of volunteering. If you expect or receive monetary rewards for it then it’s not volunteering but more of a job.”
Mr Loh Wai Poon questions the rationale of paying for volunteer work.
“A bit of twisted logic,” Mr Loh said. “It may be another form of financial aid. Frankly, volunteerism cannot be boosted by paying volunteers. It is very good to be paid $3K to $5K for 25 hours of community work. This is $120 – $200 per hour! Will it lead to monetarism? Are we sending the wrong message to future volunteers?”
Mr Steve Lim also questioned the scheme.
“Having an allowance for meal and transport is common for volunteer where by at time a token of appreciate is given for some. However when you place a large amount of money for a small amount of duration, it better to put the money to good use instead. For $3000 – $5000, you could have up to 4 full time staff per month, or part time staff at $ 5 to $8 per hour.”
In June last year, the Ministry of Education (MOE)’s introduction of cash incentives as rewards for students who show certain leadership and personal qualities was also criticised. (See here.)
For example, the MOE announced that students “who display good leadership, service to community and school or excellence in non-academic activities are eligible for the Edusave Award for Achievement, Good Leadership and Service.”
These awards are in cash and range from $250 to $500 each.
Some critics say cash incentives should not be used to entice our young students to do better for themselves and the community.
Nonetheless, the GIC’s Director of Human Resources & Organization Development, Deanna Ong, speaking of the GIC scheme, says, “Through the quality interaction between the recipients and community members, we believe both sides will experience the impact of empathy and positive role modelling, which builds confidence for their future.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

主妇叹差太多了 不同诊所购疫苗价格差一倍

同一种疫苗,两个诊所卖两个价,价钱差几乎一倍,令求诊者费解。 有关疫苗为成人的麻疹、腮腺炎、德国麻疹联合疫苗(MMR)。一名不愿具名的家庭主妇(50岁)因下个月将到菲律宾旅游,需事先接受麻疹疫苗(MMR)注射,因此拨电到国立健保集团旗下的大巴窑综合诊所,询问有关疫苗价格,被告知每剂疫苗注射收费40新元。 不过,主妇的丈夫较早前,前往陈笃生医院的旅客保健及疫苗诊所接受注射,只收费29元。 而主妇的胞妹随后拨电询问新保集团旗下,淡滨尼综合诊所有关MMR疫苗注射收费时,被告知每剂疫苗收费仅20元3角。 主妇发觉,三间诊所的疫苗注射价格差距后,感到费解。她说道,虽然理解不同地方的价钱会有所差异,但是相差一倍是在太离谱了,更何况综合诊所都是政府的。“这种算是普通的疫苗,没理由价格相差这么多。” 新加坡卫生部在全国成人免疫计划下,促请成人能够注射两剂MMR疫苗,而注射费用也能使用保健储蓄支付。这个疫苗在我国三大区域医疗系统的综合诊所都有提供。 新保集团:多年未调整 国大综合诊所集团透露,每剂MMR疫苗注射收费40元;国立保健集团和新保集团告知媒体,他们综合诊所向7岁以上求诊者收费分别是40新元和20新元3角。前年甫成立的国大综合诊所,当时旗下共有五间综合诊疗所,其中四间还是从国立健保集团那儿接手的。 新保集团表示,虽然他们知道公共医疗机构的收费有所不同,但是该集团的MMR疫苗价格并没有根据多年来的价格变动而做出调整,所以收费仍是较为廉价。“在未来检讨价格时,MMR疫苗价格也会被列入当中,并把最新成本和病患所能承担的负担纳入考量中。” 另外两家疫苗收费较高的集团则表示,他们致力于为病患提供能负担得起的优质护理服务。 药物价格差别原因多 卫生部长颜金勇曾在2012年国会上提到,公共医院药物价格有差别的原因很多,包括他们在药物新旧合约上的买卖价格有变动、各机构的价格框架不同等。…

【冠状病毒19】准备返中国 住宿舍客工确诊

一名住在客工宿舍的中国籍员工,准备返回中国,不过在进行冠病检测时确诊感染。 根据卫生部文告,在昨日(15日)新增的16例冠病19确诊中,其中有一例属本地感染病例,就是上述确诊的中国籍客工。 早前他曾进行定期例行检测(Rostered Routine Testing),结果呈阴性反应;目前也未出现症状。 然而,在血清检测(serology test)时却出现阳性反应,相信可能是早前曾被感染。所有曾与确诊者近接触人士已被令隔离。 其余入境病例方面,有三名是本地公民,分别从印度、英国和美国入境。 六人是从巴西、印度和印尼入境的工作准证持有者。 一人从西班牙入境,持家属准证,还有一名从印度入境的学生证持有者。 其余四人是持短期探访证持有者,两人为我国公民和永久居民的家属,包括从印尼入境的一岁男童,以及从印度入境的24岁男子。 还有一名从俄罗斯入境的29岁综合武术运动参与者,以及持航空通行证从澳洲入境的24岁中国籍男子。…