Ms Lee with a resident Photo: Lee Lilian Facebook]
Ms Lee with a resident Photo: Lee Lilian Facebook]
Ms Lee with a resident Photo: Lee Lilian Facebook]

“As parents, we are always concerned about the well being of our child,” Member of Parliament (MP) for Punggol East single-member constituency (SMC), Lee Lilian, said on her Facebook page on Sunday.

“Therefore it is certainly a relief to hear Minister Tan [Chuan-Jin] say that the ministry is considering harmonizing the benefits for single parents,” Ms Lee, a Workers’ Party MP, said.

Last week, Mr Tan, who is the minister in charge at the Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF), said that “unwed working mothers may soon get the same benefits as married ones under a review being conducted by MSF.”

One of the differences often highlighted is how unwed mothers get eight weeks of maternity leave paid for by their employers, while married mothers get 16 weeks, and do not benefit from the Handicapped Child Relief, nor the Baby Bonus cash gift.

“My sense is that the public understands and sympathises with single unwed mothers; I see it on the ground,” Mr tan told the media. “When I came in, I asked my colleagues to see whether we can review some of these things. Some of the differentiation that exists, could we harmonise it?”

The government has long been afraid that any changes in policies may signal a shift in its position that the nucleus family must consist of married parents with children.

Mr Tan, however, feel that perhaps it is time for a review.

“The support provided for single parents, single mothers, unwed mothers really isn’t just about that Baby Bonus – I know there are differences, but actually the help extended needs to be much more extensive.

“It’s about healthcare availability, it’s about education opportunities and the support that comes with it. So, on the one hand, while there are some differences that exist today the help isn’t just in those areas. Actually the more fundamental issue is that broader extent of help.”

Ms Lee, while welcoming the proposed review, nonetheless says it was “ridiculous that we are even discussing this.”

“Married or single, they are parents,” she said.

Ms Lee has been a long-time advocate for single parents to be treated equally as married ones – a position she has held as far back as 2008, when she would blog about the issue.

She had also raised her concerns during her election rally speeches in Punggol East in 2013.

“An unmarried single mom will not qualify for the tax relief for a foreign domestic worker and is entitled to only 2 days of childcare leave per year for a child below the age of 7,” she said in her speech in Parliament in February 2013. “Her child is considered “illegitimate” by the government. Despite this she will still need to pay taxes and her son will still need to do national service.”

She said that “for a country suffering from a fertility crisis, each child should be valued, and not punished simply because he or she is born to unmarried parents.”

“Parents-to-be have many concerns, especially given the high cost of living and increasingly competitive environment we live in,” Ms Lee said. “This includes the loss of income when they have to drop out of work to look after their children, or experiencing a drop in their career prospects, when they have worked so hard from school days to make a successful career. Many parents are concerned about financial insecurity and how to balance having children and their careers, especially so for mothers.”

“I hope that the government will appreciate the needs of the child, as well as the value of the bond between a mother and her child, which is non-measurable in monetary terms. This is not about encouraging more single mothers, but ensuring better and fair support for children who have been born to them.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

High costs of childcare and pre-schools an impediment to parenthood, according to position paper by PAP Women's Wing MPs

A position paper by six MPS of the People’s Action Party (PAP)…

“疫情发哨人”专访遭下架 中国网民挑战审查底线广传文章

本周二(10日),中国国家主席习近平到湖北省武汉首次视察,引起当地轰动,但在同一天,一篇关于武汉医生的采访却引发了网友的关注。 据报道指出,3月10日早上,国家级权威出版机构人民出版社《人物》杂志原本在网上发布一篇文章《发哨子的人》,其接受采访的对象即是武汉中心医院急诊科主任艾芬,诉说她从疫情初到现在的经历与感受。 该篇文章指出,当天正是艾芬向同学转发一份病毒检测报告,才让整个武汉的医生圈得悉事件,包括被警方训诫的李文亮医生。 随后她被指是“造谣的源头”,受到了医院纪委的严厉批评,让她大受打击。 随后这篇文章在发布三小时后却便被删除,尽管中国一直以来以高强度的管制舆论而闻名,但此次删贴却发生始料未及的反作用,网民却如同接龙赛一般,利用各种方式,例如截图文章、表情图代号、甲骨文、拼音等,无所不用其极,只为了让文章继续在网络流传。 为何《发哨子的人》格外引起注意? 此次《发哨子的人》为何会格外引起注意,其中缘由为该篇报道首次公开,艾芬是“吹哨人”李文亮医生所发出的“SARS冠状病毒”检测报告照片的拍摄者。 此外,艾芬也透露有关部门在疫情初期时,刻意压制信息的细节。 文中提到,艾芬与李文亮、江学庆、梅仲明均为武汉市中心医院任职的医生,于12月医治一名高烧不退的病人,以及一名肺部感染近10天的病人。 12月30日,她接到一份不明肺炎病人的病毒检测报告,上面写着“SARS 冠状病毒”。她深知后面的影响,随即将其上报,并将报告发给医生同学。 之后该份报告在武汉医生之间流传,其中转发的人也包括李文亮医生。当时李文亮医生所公开的报告截图,即是艾芬所拍摄。…

Woman who sued PUB for S$5 million over manhole incident decides to accept settlement offer

A middle-aged woman who went ahead with court proceedings to sue national…

偷拍转发女客户照片 超市临时体温检测员遭解雇

社交媒体上最近传出一组超市逛街的女客户照片,被指是由一名为Yixian的员工所拍下后分享到聊天群组内,更表示“私藏”了她们的电话号码,最终被查出是一间超市的体温检测员,已经被解雇了。 在脸书群组上最近流传了一组超市女客户的照片,据提供者Kong网友指出,这组照片是由一名在超市工作的体温检测员所拍摄,然后分享到聊天群组中,呼吁网民们提高警惕。 在所分享的照片中,也有部分是聊天群组的截图,指检测员是在检测站和超市内进行偷拍,他更询问聊天群组内的成员是否要照片中女子的联络电话,之后又表示不愿分享女子的电话号码,要“私藏”。 据网民指出,有人查出该拍摄者是在武吉知马一带,铁道广场(Rail Mall)的冷藏公司超市(Cold Storage)工作。而在被人们查出偷拍女客户照片后,该名体温检测员已经被超市解雇了。 据该超市的经营者牛奶公司(Dairy Farm)指出,涉案的体温检测员是一名兼职员工,通过本地一家人力资源公司安排,在冠状病毒期间到超市来协助体温检测工作。目前,公司已经解雇他了。 警方也证实接获相关事件的投报,目前正在展开调查中。