https://twitter.com/Riodemaniaac/status/627064345227169792

An unknown fault between the Bugis and the Tanah Merah MRT stations caused service delays along the East West Line and certain parts of the North-South Line during the peak hour on Friday.

Transport operator, SMRT, which is in charge of these two lines, did not make any announcement on its social media platforms, neither were free bus services activated for the train disruption.

In Exercise Greyhound (2012) carried out jointly by LTA, SBST and SMRT, social media was identified as one of the evaluation criteria for public communication during service disruptions:

“LTA, as the exercise coordinator, assessed SMRT and SBST’s arrangement for free travel on existing public bus services, and the operation of bus shuttle services to provide transport service between the affected MRT stations. They were also tested on public communications, which included promptly informing the public of a service disruption and providing regular updates at the stations and through the media and social media channels such as twitter until normal service is resumed.”

It is thus puzzling why the SMRT did not provide updates on its social media platforms on Friday, particularly on its Twitter and Facebook account pages.

In 2012, SMRT revised the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) to start detrainment to track (if necessary), within 30mins from incident occurrence (45mins previously).

Also, the SCDF would be activated in any train-to-track detrainment.

From postings on social media about Friday’s incident, the delay likely occurred during the period between 6.00pm to 7.30pm.

Here are some postings on social media by commuters about the delay on Friday:

https://twitter.com/peppermintkid/status/627063726043217920

https://twitter.com/billyjrneO_o/status/627068831379238912

https://twitter.com/suehahnah/status/627070959128702976

https://twitter.com/sliderdimension/status/627072060590702592

https://twitter.com/dori_lukey/status/627077074369404928

https://twitter.com/fai_anna/status/627079253813649409

https://twitter.com/CreesterLam/status/627078703890063360

https://twitter.com/wiltedpeonies/status/627087990557257728

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Why does (in)equality matter?

By Luke Lu – Why does (in)equality matter?[1] There has been recent…

浅谈非选区议员谬论 朱正熙律师:这是个无上权力的附属品

翻译自朱正熙律师文章: “继续投我们(行动党),你还是能保持12名反对党在国会,而且是拥有充分投票权”,这是人民行动党强调非选区议员的论述。 人民行动党的论点看起来极富吸引力。显然,人民行动党认为此次仍然会大胜,这也是为什么他们在竞选期间一直专注于此课题(非选区议员)。然而,我并不认为这是一个很好的论点,甚至无法确定这是否对于新加坡是件好事,所以让我们更深入地思考非选区议员制度。 首先,人民行动党通于2016年通过了这项宪法修正案,以此赢得选举。当时仍有另一项饱受争议的宪法修正案为对民选总统进行修改。 每当你听到非选区议员的论点时,请注意,尽管它极具吸引力,但这是一个无上权力的附属品,摆弄我国选举制度的最根本。 我们在回答前一个问题前,先提出一个疑问:非选区议员制度会产生何种形式的影响?非选区议员将砍断各市镇会与政治代表的联系。当选的议员有权代表居民写信给政府,并能够掌控市镇会,使它对居民产生具体的利益。 因此,若砍断在野党对于市镇会掌控,等同于砍断他们能够为居民贡献的机会。 反观若人民行动党输了议员议席,该当如何?失去议席的人民行动党候选人还可以再基层担任基层领导,得到人民协会的大力支持。人民协会在2019年以5.16亿元持续经营。是的,你没看错,是将近5亿元的预算,可是输了的在野党却无法享有同等的待遇。 以《今日报》的报道为例,文章内也指出人民行动党如何利用市镇会来巩固人民行动党的权力。在竞选期未开始前,行动党的旗帜和海报已经充斥在马林百列集选区内,而市镇会的管辖亦包括协助挂上海报。 最后,也是最现实的问题,即使你想看到您属意的在野党,作为非选区议员出现在国会,你也得要把票投给他们,他们才有可能有机会成为非选区议员。 总而言之,请勿害怕投票给在野党! 原文阅读在此

MOH preliminarily confirms additional 548 cases of COVID-19 infection; Total tally at 31,616

As of Sunday noon (24 May), the Ministry of Health (MOH) has…

AVA: Poultry and poultry products in Singapore free from H5N1 avian flu

Agri-Food & Veterinary Authority (AVA) assures the public that poultry and poultry…