Ms Wee, one of the residents at the Design, Build and Sell Scheme (DBSS), The Peak at Toa Payoh filed a complaint with the Housing Development Board (HDB) after having a huge long crack appearing on her balcony door.

Ms Wee wrote to the HDB, “My balcony door has a huge long crack that suddenly appeared without any impact of any sort. I am worried that it will break further and hurt my toddler and preschooler.”

cracked screen

The reply by HDB is as followed,

“Our inspection on 11 Aug 2015 revealed that there is a crack on the bottom left area of 2nd panel master bedroom glass sliding door towards the master bedroom balcony area. We wish to explain that the flat purchasers have entered into a Sale and Purchase (S&P) agreement directly with the developer.

We wish to inform that the defects liability period under Clause 17 of the Sale and Purchase Agreement is 12 months from the date you receive the Notice of Vacant Possession. The defects liability period for your flat has since expired on 4 Jun 2013.

We understand that the developer has replied to you pertaining to your feedback on the master bedroom sliding door. To address your safety concerns, you may engage own contractor to proceed with the replacement accordingly.”

Frustration due to multiple defects

In Ms Wee’s reply to HDB, she claimed that the developer has yet replied to her query. She also exclaimed that despite living in her former flat at Toa Payoh Lorong 2 for more than 2 decades prior to moving, she never had a sliding door glass or any of her windows for that matter, crack in this manner for no rhyme or reason.

She therefore thinks it is probobly either there was a hairline crack in the window, not visible to the human eye (just like the MBR toilet’s ceiling’s waterproofing was broken by their worker whilst installing the brackets) or the material is not good.

“These are things I cannot figure out before the DLP is up right? But the built of it definitely has issues IMHO. It’s been less than three years since we moved in. Call me baffled.” said Ms Wee.

She added that she thinks it is terribly unfair that residents have been charged an arm and a leg for the DBSS flats, and then realize that lousy materials were used and then have to further pay to fix the issue.

“I frankly cannot afford to fix it with three kids on a single income. We never imagined this sort of incident could happen neither did could we possible imagine that the DBSS flats are of such inferior make and quality. HDB must not assume if people live in DBSS flats, they must be rich and be able to afford such repairs. Financial circumstances can change.” said Ms Wee.

She asked HDB to advice me on how she can request for further assistance in this matter as she is not willing to have to take on the burden of replacing this glass door.

Referring to the existing defects in her HDB flat, Ms Wee lamented, “We already have so many things to replace in less than two years – cabinet doors have warped, bathroom fixtures were not working slightly after a year, kitchen tap is rusting after the 1.5 years mark. The cost to replace all that is already phenomenal for a single income family.”

The recent cases of DBSS’s defects have been a hot topic among citizens in the past few months.

For example, Pasir Ris ONE, drew national attention for its narrow corridor, badly designed ceiling of the corridor, and for its poor workmanship within the units.

In June, and in response to these complaints, the HDB said most of the flaws were “surface imperfections”.

Minister of National Development, Mr Khaw Boon Wan has so far not said much about the complaints, except that homeowners can send their feedback to MND and the HDB, and they would see if they could assist homeowners after looking into the cases.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【冠状病毒19】确诊者曾到访一家贸易公司和两超市

曾有冠状病毒19确诊病例到访一家贸易公司和两家超市,卫生部呼吁若曾有民众曾与确诊者同一时间出现在该有关地点,密切留意自己的健康状况。 据卫生部昨日(16日)文告指出,曾有确诊病例于本月11日傍晚5点30分至6点左右,到访位于赛阿威路86号(86 Syed Alwi Road)的Sri Murugan贸易公司。 除此之外,也有确诊病例于本月14日傍晚5点30分至6点,到访新世界中心(New World Centre)的昇菘超市(Sheng Siong Supermarket);同日的晚间8点至9点,也有确诊病例到访位于乔治王道803号(803 King…

针对防假消息草案 媒体从业员发联署声明

本地一群前任和现役的主流及网络媒体从业员,于昨日发表公开联署声明,对于《防止网络假消息籍网络操纵法》在本月1日提呈国会一读感到遗憾,提出对该法的忧虑和反对。 联署声明担忧,新法将进一步侵害言论自由,打击媒体从业员的工作。同时认为政府未珍视新兴数码新闻行业,理应更积极与媒体从业员联手抗衡假消息。再者,也可能令政府问责遭削弱。 有关声明也转寄给所有国会议员,以期下月召开国会议员们参与防止假消息法案辩论时,对问题有更深入了解。 这批媒体从业员认为,防假消息法构成的问题包括: 侵害言论自由,并没有清楚区分何谓事实、意见观点和假消息之间的差别; 政府更为被动,而不是更积极与媒体联手抗衡假消息; 法案赋予政府的权利缺乏监督机制,使之有被执政政府滥用的可能。 这批媒体从业员认为,落实防假消息法将对本土言论自由构成直接和长期的伤害、阻碍公民思辨的发展,也侵蚀民间对政府的信任。 声明中提出三点关注: 关注一:防假消息法是对言论自由的侮辱 新加坡政府特别是律政部一再强调,防假消息法旨在保障言论自由,意见观点不会被对付。然而,敬业的媒体从业员为了让读者更深入了解政府政策,也常需要引进不同人士观点或可能和政府相左的数据或分析。但新法似乎未能清楚阐释,谨慎分析的观点会否与法案相冲突。 再者,法案第一部分第2(2)条文,对于假消息陈述的定义也过于笼统模糊,假设记者报导引用政府提供的事实,惟记者提出异议,会否被法案对付?…

教育部盼给予学生更多学习空间 来年采用新小学评分制

教育部(MOE)宣布,在2021年开始,小学离校考试(PSLE)积分制和中学一年的录取制度将有所变动。 该部门指出,为了摆脱过渡强调学术成绩的影响,新的小学离校考试评分系统将依据学生在各科目的表现进行评分,并让学生有更多灵活性和空间,以便在学习过程中发展自己的优势和兴趣。 从2020年的小学五年级开始,学校将在成绩水平(AL)中展现学生在五年级和六年级的学校考试成绩,以便学生和家长能更熟悉新的评分系统。 小学考试科目将提供标准和基础水平,基础水平科目能够满足学生的学习需求,帮助他们建立强大的基础,让他们在适合他们的速度和水平中更有信心学习。 在新的评分系统下,参加基础水平科目的学生将被评为AL A至AL C,提供学生对下一个学习课程准备程度的指示。为了中学一年级的录取,基础水平为AL A至AL C的学生,将分别和标准水平科目的AL 6和AL 8挂钩,就如下图所示,以得出学生的小学离校考试总积分。 教育部指出,这种挂钩反映了一个事实,即基础水平科目的课程,是标准水平科目的一个子集(subset),与标准水平相比,基础水平的评估负荷要求较低。…

Retirement and Re-employment (Amendment) Bill 2016 to take effect from 1 July 2017

The Retirement and Re-employment (Amendment) Bill 2016 was passed by Parliament on…