ahpetc-office-2

The following letter was published on the Workers’ Party website.

SECOND OPEN LETTER TO RESIDENTS OF ALJUNIED-HOUGANG-PUNGGOL EAST TOWN

Dear Residents,

In my First Open Letter to you in June 2015, I explained three main points concerning various allegations made against Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC).  These were:

1. AHPETC does not and cannot reserve contracts for “friends” due to the public tender process;

2. The alleged “overpayment” by AHPETC to its former Managing Agent (MA), when compared to rates paid by PAP TCs in 2014, was an exaggeration, looking at the rates paid by PAP TCs in 2011, 2012 and 2013 according to data provided by the Ministry of National Development (MND);

3. The MA rates that AHPETC agreed to pay its MA in 2012 were arrived at taking into account the MA rate paid by the PAP management of Aljunied TC to its former MA.

If you missed the first open letter, you can read it online at http://www.ahpetc.sg/sylvia-lims-open-letter-to-residents/.

In this Second Open Letter, I would like to clarify and reassure all residents that AHPETC places your interests at the heart of its work and continues to make improvements to its financial management.

This letter will cover the issue of Conflicts of Interest and AHPETC’s financial position.

 1.      Conflict of Interest and Related Party Transactions

There have been allegations concerning related party transactions between AHPETC and its former MA, FM Solutions & Services Pte Ltd (FMSS).

First, there is no longer any issue, as AHPETC is now directly managed and does not outsource its work to an MA.  The previous MA contract expired on 14 July 2015, and there were no bidders to take over the MA services after 14 July 2015.

Since 15 July 2015, AHPETC has been self-managed.  This means that AHPETC is now directly hiring staff to handle estate, finance, administration and other tasks, instead of outsourcing the work to an MA.

Under direct management, AHPETC’s contractors continue to deliver services under the existing contracts, now supervised by TC’s directly hired staff.

Second, there was never any conflict of interest whatsoever between the Workers’ Party (WP) or any of its Members of Parliament (MPs) and FMSS.  Neither WP nor any of its MPs or members has any interest in the business of FMSS.  None of the directors and shareholders of FMSS is a member of WP.

Third, there have been accusations that when the MA was working at AHPETC, the husband and wife team who owned FMSS could freely sign payments to themselves.  This is not true.  When WP took over in 2011, one of the first decisions made by the new Aljunied-Hougang Town Council was to require any cheques to the MA, no matter how small the amount, to require the counter-signature of AHPETC Chairman and Vice-Chairmen who have no interest in the MA’s business.

2.      Financial Position of AHPETC

Some people have accused AHPETC of bankruptcy and running huge deficits that are not sustainable, and also warned residents of other towns not to vote for WP so as not to subsidise AHPETC.  These allegations are misguided.

AHPETC filed its audited accounts for FY 14/15, on time, by 31 August 2015.  Though these accounts show AHPETC in annual deficit, this is because AHPETC has still NOT received its annual S&CC operating grant of $7.2 million from the government, which would normally have been paid to all Town Councils in April 2014.   Taking into account the $7.2 million in grant which AHPETC expects to receive, AHPETC’s annual income and expenditure statement would show an annual surplus of $1.7 million.

The past operating deficit was largely the outcome of higher tender price for various service contracts and start-up costs.

The current positive position came about through a combination of steps taken by AHPETC. These included lowering its utilities costs by using contestable energy, reducing its general and administrative expenditure, and increasing its revenue.

Throughout the difficult initial years, AHPETC management believed that it could improve the TC’s financial position, and the latest audit shows that it has.  We expect to further consolidate and improve AHPETC’s financial position going forward.

We have done our best to serve residents, and I would like to express appreciation to our staff for their contribution to the progress we have made and to our residents for their support and understanding.

SYLVIA LIM
CHAIRMAN
ALJUNIED-HOUGANG-PUNGGOL EAST TOWN COUNCIL

August 2015

You can read the open letter in Chinese here and in Malay here.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Lee Hsien Yang suggests that gov’t COVID-19 task force should have been led by an infectious diseases specialist instead of politicians

“Perhaps the Multi Ministry Task Force should have been led by an…

Workers’ Party MPs and politicians thank overseas voters for “making their vote count”

WP MP for Sengkang GRC He Ting Ru noted in a Facebook…

Full slate of WP Marine Parade GRC candidates continue to walk the ground on tail end of campaign trail

As general election candidates across Singapore reach the tail end of the…

仅上半年就超越前两年记录 骨痛热症病例破5000宗

今年骨痛热症病例似乎有所增加,目前已有四宗骨痛热症死亡病例,每个月有数百宗新病例。 据报导,今年2月份,两名分别居住在勿洛的74岁年长者,和居住在后港的77岁年长者被骨痛热症夺命。而在3月份宏茂桥一名71岁的男子也因此病逝。 另有一名住在后港的63岁年长者也于本月逝世。国家环境局(NEA)指出,所有的死亡病例都发生在病例集中区。 据环境局2019年骨痛热症检测数据显示,今年首季度(1月至3月)的病例共有2223宗,其中有25宗为骨痛溢血热症。这比上个季度,即去年的10月至12月增加了87.9巴仙的病例,上个季度共记录了1183宗病例。 更令人不安的是,今年截至6月17日,我国骨痛热症比例已经达到了5184宗,远远超过了2018年的病例总数,2018年共记录了3285宗病例,而在2017年共有2771宗。 单单只是今年的一周内,即6月9日至15日,环境局就接获467宗骨痛热症病例的报告,比上一周多出了67宗。事实上,环境局的报告显示,在过去三个月,每周记录的骨痛热症病例都增加了四倍。 病例集中区增加一倍 截止本月17日,环境局也检测到本月的骨痛热症病例集中区,共多达112个集中区,比上个月增加了一个倍。这显示了环境局在首个季度确定的214个病例集中区,已经在过去的三个月中增加了很多。情况似乎在第二季度会变得更糟糕。 截止今天(19日),根据环境局的数据显示,一共确定了119个活跃的病例集中区,其中有33个被列为“已爆发10宗病例的高风险区”。首五个区域为: 1.兀兰6道、兀兰环、Cres、兀兰 70和70通道 2.兀兰…