Some members of the committee
Some members of the committee
Some members of the committee

Historically important monument but no historians on committee

The composition of the committee which will look into the establishment of a “Founders’ Memorial” in Singapore has come under question.

The 15-member panel, which will collect public feedback on the nature of the memorial the next 18 months, was announced on 30 June.

It will be headed by Lee Tzu Yang, who is also the chairman of The Esplanade.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong had said in Parliament in April that the late former leader of Singapore, Lee Kuan Yew, “was always conscious that he did not act alone, but as a member of a team.”

“His core team included Goh Keng Swee, S Rajaratnam, Othman Wok, Hon Sui Sen, Lim Kim San, amongst others.”

He added, “So, it is appropriate that we consider how to honour not just Mr Lee, but also our other founding fathers.”

The idea for a Founders’ Memorial was soon suggested and the committee appointed.

However, for such a historically important monument, questions are being asked about why there are no historians on the committee.

The 15-member panel consists of academics, businessmen, a community club chairman, a school principal, an ambassador and even a newspaper editor, among others.

“Given that the Founders’ Memorial will be dedicated to historical personalities who shaped Singapore’s history, I am intrigued that not a single professional historian is on the committee,” Ms Chan Cheng Lin wrote in a letter to the Straits Times forum page on Friday.

“There are many history professors from the National University of Singapore and the Nanyang Technological University, as well as a handful of independent history researchers and overseas-based Singaporean historians, who specialise in Singapore history,” he said.

“With their expertise, they will be able to provide valuable input to this important history-related project. Unfortunately, none of them is on the committee.”

The chairman of the committee, however, told the media on 30 June, “(The memorial is) not about coming up with a defined view of history, but about stimulating interest in how we became an independent nation, and the ideals and values … of our founding generation of leaders.”

Mr Lee Tzu Yang said that the memorial is meant to “unify Singaporeans”, not just in the present day, but also “for future generations to inspire them with stories of how the nation came to be”.

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

For the last time, TOC is not a political party!

This article was first published at this blog. by Siew Kum Hong…

2020大选选票及相关文件 将在本周六销毁

根据选举局今日文告,2020年大选的选票和相关选举文件,将在1月16日,运往大士南焚化厂销毁。 国会选举法有规定,选票以及其他选举文件,选后都需放入密封的箱子,并安全存放半年。 除非总统另有指示,选票和文件将被销毁,以保证投票是秘密的。 不过,选举局在去年10月曾指出,白沙—榜鹅集选区PN23的选民登记册,误被放入投票箱连同选票和其他文件密封。为此总统下令,选举官在1月10日当天或之后,在最高法院打开相关密封箱子,以便取出意外置入投票箱的选民册。 箱子之后仍要密封,连同其他箱子一同销毁。基于防疫措施,代表见证销毁仪式的参选政党代表人数将被限制。

新隆高铁等项目贵到吓死人 毕博渊:国家财务管理堪虞

邻国马来西亚刚在本月12日,与中国达成协议,将原本搁置的东海岸铁路(ECRL)计划成本大砍215亿令吉至440亿令吉(约145亿新元),降幅高达32.8巴仙,并预计将于下月复工。 东海岸铁路计划全长648公里,负责与中国谈判的马国首相特使敦达因,向媒体指出新路线的每公里造价为6800万令吉,比过去9800万令吉(约3210万新元)减少3000万令吉。 东铁计划乃是马国前首相纳吉执政时推出的计划,原本估计造价约为550亿令吉,不过希盟执政后,就马上喊停和检讨东铁等巨资计划,希盟也宣称东铁的成本已暴涨至810亿令吉。 至于另一项被喊停展延并检讨的前朝计划,则是我国和马来西亚合作的新隆高铁工程。 马哈迪:目前不需要新隆高铁 马哈迪昨日告知当地媒体,新龙高铁计划虽是好计划,但现阶段马来西亚不需要落实,而是专注于提升现有的铁路系统服务。 新隆高铁的展延期限将在2020年5月31日到期,如届时马国仍无意继续隆新高铁计划,他们需要承担新加坡在履行新隆高铁双边协议时承担的成本。 2016年7月,新马两国签署新隆高铁备忘录。高铁全长350公里,计划从新加坡裕廊东站起,沿途经柔佛、马六甲、芙蓉和布城至吉隆坡。2018年动工,原本预计在2026年竣工。 新隆高铁每公里要价4800万新元? 然而,比较已经减价的东铁计划以及新马合作的新隆高铁。新隆高铁全长仅350公里,成本预算却要高达168亿新元,等同于每公里的造价,就要高达4800万新元。 反之,东铁计划全长648公里,其中还有一段七公里的隧道工程,但是在被砍价后,每公里造价仅约2237万新元。 对此,本地政治工作者毕博渊,对于我国为何不与邻国兼主要贸易伙伴重新商谈造价深感不解,也质疑何以新隆高铁的路程比东铁短,造价却更为昂贵?…