van Deijzen
van Deijzen
van Deijzen

Just two weeks after he was sentenced to a three weeks’ jail for assaulting a taxi driver, 34-year old Dutchman Dino Petrus Johannes van Deijzen saw his sentence increased to three months.

The deputy public prosecutor had appealed the original sentence, saying the judge in that case, District Judge Imran Abdul Hamid, seemed to have been convinced by van Deijzen’s portrayal of himself as a victim.

The Dutchman, a design executive, had claimed that the taxi driver, Me Ee Kah Ling, had also hit him, resulting in the former losing consciousness.

Justice Imran was reported to have “noted that the victim had also engaged in a scuffle with van Deijzen and traded blows, which would have explained the blunt force trauma suffered by the accused.”

However, justice Tay rejected this.

He said Mr van Deijzen’s claims were “convenient excuses to downplay his use of inexcusable violence” against Mr Ee, 42.

Further, justice Tay noted that Mr van Deijzen was not remorseful and that there were neither an offer of compensation to Mr Ee noran apology from the Dutchman.

Mr van Deijzen and his girlfriend were reportedly intoxicated when they hailed and boarded Mr Ee’s cab at Dunlop Street at almost 1am on 21 October.

They asked to be ferried to blk 538 in Ang Mo Kio.

When the taxi reached the destination, Mr van Deijzen’s girlfriend vomited in the taxi.

Mr Ee then asked the couple to leave the car and asked for the fare.

The couple, however, ignored him and walked away without paying.

At this point, Mr Ee threatened to call the police, and was retrieving his phone from his taxi when Mr van Deijzen pounced on him, slammed the door and punched Mr Ee.

Me Ee tried to escape and ran away, but Mr van Deijzen gave chase and pushed him to the ground, and continued to punch and kick Mr Ee.

The heinous act was caught by the in-vehicle CCTV of Mr Ee’s taxi.

Soosay (Photo: Straits Times)
Soosay (Photo: Straits Times)

Also in June, National University of Singapore (NUS) law professor, Sundram Peter Soosay, 43, has been found guilty of assaulting a taxi driver while drunk.

Mr Soosay, who is a Singapore permanent resident and has been working at NUS since 2008, was lambasted by District Judge Victor Yeo in court.

Judge Yeo said Mr Soosay’s testimony was “riddled with hindsight reasoning, convenient conjecture and hypothesis”.

Judge Yeo then sentenced the law professor to four months jail and ordered him to compensate the taxi driver, 71-year old Sun Chun Hua. (See here.)

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

The Dolphin Project makes proposal to RWS over dolphins

The following is a letter from Mr Richard O’Barry to Resorts World…

李显龙东盟峰会晤越南总理 阮春福重申“越南侵柬”论不实

第34届东盟峰会在泰国曼谷举行,于今日(6月23日)上午进行开幕式,十国领导人包括我国总理李显龙,参与非正式领导人会议。 在峰会大会期间,李总理也会见了越南总理阮春福,双方重新确立深化良好双边关系的承诺。 不过,阮春福也在会面时向李显龙重申,有关后者针对1979-1980年阶段越南“入侵”柬埔寨的言论,是不正确的。 根据《越南人民报》报导,阮春福总理表示,这些偏见的再次提起对越南和柬埔寨伤害很深的,尤其是对为带来和平,帮助柬埔寨人民摆脱红色高棉残暴制度和今后艰苦的柬埔寨国家重建进程而牺牲生命的数十万名越南志愿军的家属的伤害。 对此,李显龙总理解释,新加坡并非故意伤害越南,而是仅提起印度支那史上一段痛苦的篇章,进而突出强调今日的和平、稳定与繁荣是来之不易。 李总理强调,我国高度重视与越南的互信友好关系,并高度评价越南一直以来对维护地区和平、安全、稳定与发展和建设强大、团结、自强的东盟共同体的重要作用与贡献。 越南刚在6月7日举行的联合国大会上当选联合国安全理事会非常任理事国,任期从2020年1月1日开始至2021年。 另一方面,李显龙也与印尼总统佐科维会面。 李显龙是在5月31日,于个人脸书专页发文哀悼泰国前首相布勒姆的逝世。其中提及布勒姆当年曾反对“越南入侵柬埔寨”,且不承认取代红高棉的柬埔寨政府。 李显龙指泰国站在最前线,在柬泰边界面对越南部队。布勒姆当时坚决不接受此情况,与东盟伙伴合作,在国际论坛上反对越南的侵占,“这阻止了军事入侵和政权更迭被合理化,保护东南亚各国的安全。” 李显龙也形容布勒姆是新加坡的好朋友,和其父亲已故建国总理李光耀密切合作,加强新泰关系。 对于李显龙的上述言论,柬埔寨国防部长狄班、越南政府和柬埔寨总理洪森等,都对李显龙“越南侵柬”论表达遗憾。而外交部在6月7日则发文告回应,绝不会同情红高棉、也绝不愿看到红高棉政权重返柬埔寨。…

16 million people quarantined in Northern Italy due to Covid-19

Special permission will be required to travel for Italians residing in Lombardy…

穿凉鞋事件被批双重标准 星耀樟宜称员工疏忽

星耀樟宜被质疑以双重标准待客,一名母亲表示其儿子曾因为穿着凉鞋而被拒绝进入“雪道”景点,却有名人之子穿着凉鞋入场拍照,申诉不满。惟被指名人的本地DJ林佩芬澄清,并没有获得特殊待遇,而星耀樟宜也表示是“工作人员疏忽”,不持任何双重标准。 网民Kailin Ng,于本月3日在脸书上帖文指出,她日前和儿子艾登(Aden)到星耀樟宜星空花园(Canopy Park)的“雪道”(Snow Walk)景点游玩时,本想让孩子看看《冰雪奇缘》中的雪道景点,但是却发现该景点有限制,仅允许穿包鞋的访客入内使用,因此无法进入设施内。 然而数天后,Kailin却在社交媒体上看见本地著名电台主持人林佩芬分享了和孩子一起在“雪道”景点游玩的照片,惊见照片中的小男孩穿着凉鞋,而主持人则在凉鞋外套上鞋套,因此质疑当局在待客方面持有双标准。 Kailin的帖文立刻引起网民的关注,纷纷为她“打抱不平”。 面对有关指控,星耀樟宜和主持人都发言否认。 星耀樟宜:员工疏忽 星耀樟宜接受《8视界》询问时曾表示,当局的首要认为是确保访客能在最佳条件下享用设施,因此才会有要求访客穿上包鞋才能进入的限制。 “出现访客穿着凉鞋就进入雪道场景事件,则是工作人员的疏忽,已经提醒相关工作人员,要确保访客穿着符合规定的鞋子才能进入景点。” 星耀樟宜也表示已经让客户中心和Kailin联系,邀请他们母子在到访星耀樟宜。…