Straits Times, 09 July 2015
Straits Times, 09 July 2015
Straits Times, 09 July 2015

On 2 June, The Online Citizen (TOC) reported that the 18 polyclinics in Singapore had increased its general consultation fees. (See here: “Polyclinics up consultation fees from 1 July“.)

However, the two healthcare service providers who run the polyclinics have declined to provide details of the increases.

In a report in the Straits Times on 9 July, it said that “neither Singhealth nor the National Healthcare Group (NHG)… was willing to to disclose exactly by how much fees have increased.”

TOC had in its report said that the two groups had updated  their websites with the new charges.

They, however, made no public announcements of this.

Nonetheless, TOC observed that over at Singhealth polyclinics, consultation fees have been raised between $0.40 and $2.90. For Singaporean adults, it is up by $0.80 cents – from $11.00 to $11.80, while that for Singaporean adults at NHG polyclinics are up $0.60, from $11.30 to $11.90.

Singhealth fees
Singhealth fees

The NHG did inform the Straits Times that it had raised fees in April, while Singhealth did so in June.

“When the Straits Times visited one polyclinic from each group, no signs were seen to indicate that consultation fees had gone up,” the newspaper said in its report on Thursday.

It also reported that a representative from NHG saying that it had “revised” its fees “to manage rising operating costs such as utilities, infrastructure, equipment upgrades and inflation.”

Nonetheless, it assured patients that prices would remain “affordable”.

“We are committed to ensuring that the total bill continues to be affordable for our patients,” said Singhealth Polyclinics chief operating officer, Luna Lee.

In the meantime, it is unclear why the two operators would decline to publicly announce or reveal details of the the increase in fees.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

MINDEF and MHA to provide life and personal accident insurance coverage for all Full-time NSFs and NSmen

From 1 July 2016, the Ministry of Defence (MINDEF) and Ministry of…

社论:马善高称不干预租金价格 却默许社企干预小贩营业

环境及水源部长马善高在昨日于国会答复议员询问表示,政府不宜干预小贩摊位的租金价格,那将影响公平竞争。 同时,政府也不宜对生意不好的小贩给予补助,这么做会对那些在健康的市场竞争环境中表现较好的小贩不公平,这也会对附近其他私人经营的食肆不公平。 他表示,市场动力将会为小贩摊位作出公平分配,最终居民将从中受益。 马善高认为,经营模式应该确保租金和成本对小贩是透明和公平的,但不能给予小贩补助,扭曲市场的运作。 不补助小贩免“扭曲市场运作” 他声称,除了执行方面的挑战,社企小贩中心模式整体上是“健全的”,食物价格维持在可负担水平,为顾客提供各式高质量的食物选择,价格一般比邻近的咖啡店和食阁便宜。 “大部分的摊贩的生意也不错,不能让这些成就功亏一篑。政府有在搜集意见,调整模式,为国人改善服务。” 依马善高高见,应让市场“自由竞争”,让市场“看不见的手”自然调节,小贩也算是企业家,也需面对竞争和挑战等风险。 马善高之见,有一半是对的,但是高举“自由贸易”的大旗,至今以来都还是存在争议,在国际平台,强国就很喜欢高谈自由竞争,因为自由贸易主张消除所有限制和阻碍。反之,小国对自由贸易有所保留乃至小心翼翼,深恐财大气粗的强国以更雄厚实力,变相侵蚀掉弱国的财富。 强势社企VS弱势小贩 马善高真的理解,小贩有被放到一个公平的竞争平台去“自由竞争”吗? 如果小贩是自由的企业家,那等同小贩自己就是老板,是老板的话,…

陈清木痛心良好施政精神遭侵蚀 新加坡前进党致力改变政治版图

新加坡前进党创党人暨总秘书长陈清木今早召开记者会,公告媒体即将在下月3日举行的该党推介礼。席间他表示他已年届79岁不再年轻,服务选民26载、参与总统选举后原本打算推出政坛。 然而,他见今日之良好施政精神已渐乖离,对良好施政之根本,即透明、独立和问责逐渐被侵蚀,感到忧心且痛心,因为这三大根本,乃是建立政府与人民之间信任的基础。 “新加坡需要好的政治体制,即稳健的制衡(checks and balances)机制,这是新加坡人要看到的,希望我们依然能为我们的政府体制引以为傲。” 他说,作出开创新党的决定并不容易,但他走访基层和不同阶层国人见面,他们表达希望有可靠的替代政党之诉求,感到现今的体制并不均衡,因国会中压倒性的多数执政党,很容易趋向不考虑人民感受和长期后果,强推执政党的政策。 “所以有很多人和我谈、鼓励我,劝我不要保持沉默,应站出来召集肯为新加坡、人民服务的有志之士。”他忆述已故建国总理李光耀招他入行动党时,曾告知他:不想找YES MAN,而他也立志把家国人民摆在最前面,认为这是他的职责。 他表示新加坡前进党将致力改变政治版图,但没有大家的支持无法带来改变。他欣慰自号召党员以来,有许多勇敢儿女踊跃入党,而许多党中委都来自草根阶层,因为该党珍视来自广泛阶层的各界人士。 候选人将来自各阶层人士 “我可以告诉大家,我们的候选人选海纳百川,最重要的是大家的心在对的位置,我们需要不同背景、职务的人士-生意人、学者、社工、普通群众等等,只要有更多人站出来,恐惧的因素就会消失。” 他分享即便在过去也曾提出不受欢迎的异议,例如1999年当政府有意引进更多外来专才时,他提醒当时仍是不景时期,理应先保障国人的就业,结果杨荣文和李光耀都对他感到失望。…

SDP lays down challenge to Dr Vivian Balakrishnan

The Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) has issued a challenge to the Minister…