Bangkok Post

singapore_raffles

Singapore has been named in two alleged corruption cases involving two prime ministers of two different countries.

The Wall Street Journal (WSJ), in an expose of what it said was illegal funds transfers into the personal bank accounts of Malaysian Prime Minister Naib Razak, named a bank in Singapore which made the transfers.

The WSj said that on 21 and 23 March 2013, two tranches of a total of US$681 million were transferred from Falcon Private Bank in Singapore.

wsj1

falcon1

The bank describes itself as a “Swiss private banking boutique” with 50 years of expertise in wealth management and employs over 300 people.

“We provide first-class financial services to private clients and wealthy families from our headquarters in Zurich and our branches and representative offices in Geneva, London, Singapore, Abu Dhabi and Dubai,” it says.

Formerly known as AIG Private Bank AG, it changed its name in 2009 to its current one.

Its Singapore branch is located at 3 Temasek Avenue.

Together with its subsidiaries, the bank offers investment funds and mutual funds, and provides “private banking and wealth management services to high net worth private clients, institutional clients, external asset managers, and private label partners worldwide,” according to Bloomberg.

According to the Sarawak Report, which had first alleged the transfers to Mr Razak, the transfers were made “by Falcon Bank’s Singapore branch to Najib Razak’s personal account just days before the Prime Minister called the last election…”

Bangkok Post
Bangkok Post

In the second case of alleged corruption, Thailand’s Prime Minister, Prayut Chan-o-cha and his wife are being accused of transferring “tens of billions of baht to Singapore”.

Gen Prayut, however, has denied the allegations.

“If I had that amount of money, why would I have to stand here?” he said.

He has also launched an investigation into how the rumours started.

Gen Prayut says he was informed that the rumours initiated from Thammasat University which has been in the news recently after students held protests calling for the release of 14 students who were themselves detained over anti-junta protests.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Alex Au vs AGC – a matter of liability or good faith?

By Howard Lee In the hearing yesterday (21 October) of Alex Au…

Political changes are for “long term strength and stability”, says PM Lee

Govt not looking for a system which sounds good on theory, says PM Lee.

抵达我国前 15巴仙客工未获得IPA信函

人力部(MOM)去年委托市场调查公司展开一项调查,发现在非马来西亚籍工作准证持有者之中,有15.4巴仙在抵达新加坡之前,没有收到他们的原则批准信(In-Principle Approval Letter,简称:IPA)。 这个数据比最近一次进行类似调查—2014年的4巴仙来得高。 共有约2500名工作准证持有者和500名S准证持有者接受随机调查。 根据法律规定,雇主必须在为员工申请得工作准证后,于员工启程前往新加坡前,将有关的IPA信函邮寄给员工。有关的IPA信函列明就业的条款和条件,包括基本薪金。 未寄出IPA信函,雇主或被罚款一万元 在没有任何其他书面通知的情况下,该信函可作为实际上的工作合约。省略此步骤的雇主,可面对高达一万元的罚款。 至于为什么顽固的雇主仍然大幅增加,外籍劳工中心(MWC)主席杨木光表示,有些人可能并不了解这一规定。 他在出席职工总会假外籍员工中心首个娱乐俱乐部,为外籍员工举办的五一劳动节活动上致辞时指出,“我们需要继续敦促雇主们,为他们的员工提供IPA信函”。 他也促请没有收到IPA信函困扰、特别是面对薪金纠纷的外籍员工,能尽早反映他们的问题。 然而,非政府组织客工亦重(Transient…