Pasir Ris ONE
DSC_0486
Pasir Ris One

 

By Empower Advisory, Douglas Chow

Executive condos (EC) developers struggling to move inventory are set to receive a lifeline as HDB will raise the income ceilings for BTO HDB flats and ECs sometime in August or September 2015.

From the official reasoning, this regulation update is in response to the increase in median monthly household income from S$7,037 in 2011 (when the income ceilings were last raised), to $8,292 in 2015. Assuming a 30 yrs loan based on a household income of $8,292 with no other debt obligation, a typical household buyer of an EC/BTO flat can take a loan of up to about $550,000 under the existing Total Debt Servicing Ratio (TDSR)and Mortgage Service Ratio (MSR) framework. That is why in today’s market, the bulk of transactions is below $1 million as buyers can no longer qualify for huge loans, relying on cash and cpf to make up the difference. Many end up buying smaller units. Larger EC units are having a difficult time finding qualified and willing buyers.

With the income ceilings raised, larger EC units will more easily find buyers. We expect all currently unsold EC units, big and small, to benefit and this is a much needed lifeline to EC developers. MND is signaling to EC developers, “Sorry folks, I’m not going to lift cooling measures anytime soon. In the meantime, here’s a larger pool of potential buyers for you. Our SG50 gift to you.”

In principle, we agree that no one should be denied a chance to apply for a HDB BTO flat/EC, regardless of income level as long as that HDB BTO flat/EC remains a principle home of stay.

Some preliminary thoughts on ECs as a result of the upcoming change

1) Will EC developers start to raise prices? Yes, if they are confident that their units are priced competitively vis-a-vas the competition. No, if their focus is to clear their inventory as soon as they can. But they can hold off slashing their prices for now and adopt a wait and see approach.

2) Will EC developers start building bigger units that comes with a bumped up price tag to cater to the new pool of qualified higher income earners? Possibly, though price must be managed for affordability. It doesn’t mean that just because one can pay a price, one would want to pay that price.

3) Private developers will be at a disadvantage now that some of their customers can now qualify for comparatively cheaper ECs. Oops.

4) Will EC pricing inch up towards private development prices or private developments’ pricing inch down towards EC pricing?

5) Will the median income households be muscled out of the smaller units by larger income households? Will there be rules to ensure that larger income household are restricted to larger units only? The devil is in the details.

We are more concerned on the impact of BTO pricing and unit allocation now that higher income households can join in the fray. Already new BTOs are consistently oversubscribed.

1) Will lower and median income households miss out on their units because of competing applications by larger income household?

2) Will HDB build more flats or more rigorously divert qualified buyers who are out-balloted to balance flats (either repossessed or unsold flats from previous BTO launches) that number about a couple of thousands.

3) Will HDB BTO flats pricing start to increase even though they are priced at a discount from prevailing market price, there.

There are a lot of details that must be ironed out. As a former smart regulation advocate in the government, I hope the officers in charge think through every possible scenario and come up with a fair, sensible implementation. Policies are easy. As mentioned before, the devil is in the details and the policies’ implementation. The overwelming unhappiness over the quality of recent DBSS flats is a reminder that regulators must keep their eye on the ball, have the ability to see far ahead and anticipate problems down the road.

As of now, ECs developers will be cheering at this upcoming rule change. Private developers will have to continue their price discounts.

This article was first published at Empower Advisory

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

父母家长亦申诉电动滑板车禁令造成不便

早前,交通部宣布政府和三大送餐公司协商,政府和三家主要送餐公司将联手,提供700万元的津贴,协助送餐员把电动滑板车折旧,改用脚踏车等其他代步工具。 不过,在一些社交媒体,也有父母家长反映,他们也使用个人代步工具载送孩子上学放学,然而禁令也让他们面对许多不便,也无法达到“活跃通勤”的效果。 电动滑板车禁令自11月4日公布后,使依靠该代步工具送外卖的送餐员生计大受影响因。周二(12日)晚上,约300名送餐员出席在安谷民众俱乐部(Anchorvale Community Club)举行的对话会,也向盛港西单选区议员蓝彬明医生申诉他们的问题。 蓝彬明随后也在其脸书上,重点讲解他与送餐员们的商议,坦言没有完美的解决方案;禁止电动滑板车在行人道上行驶,是为了保护大多数行人的安全。 蓝彬明也指出,GrabFood为其送餐伙伴提供了转换交通工具的补助金;若送餐员有难处也可向他们的国会议员反映。 斥资700万元协助送餐员 据出席者向《今日报》反映,蓝彬明向他们详细讲解了总额700万元的以旧换新援助计划,以帮助送餐员们在无需额外付费下,将电动滑板车转换为电动脚车。 此计划是政府和新加坡三大送餐公司的协议合作,为三大送餐公司的送餐骑士们提供高达1000元现款,让他们将现有的电板车换成电动脚车或普通脚车。 蓝彬明也在其脸书帖文下总结说,“随着我们的改进,也希望行人能够为负责人的骑士们着想,尽可能地使用行人道,让骑士们能够执行责任之余,也照顾到行人安全” 。…

Upgraded German surveillance malware FinSpy purchased by Singapore company closely linked with govt

Yesterday (11 July), multinational cybersecurity and anti-virus provider Kaspersky said in a…

Toh Chin Chye and Lee Kuan Yew were cut from the same cloth

~by: Ravi Philemon~ With the passing away of Dr Toh Chin Chye,…

新加坡政府指彭博社、《南华早报》报导有误

我国财政部、内政部、人力部和教育部等部门,自去年11月底开始,就四次援引《防止网络假信息和防止网络操纵法案》(POFMA),要求政治人物和一家时政网络媒体更正贴文。 我国政府动用《防假消息法》也引起外国媒体注意,包括《华盛顿邮报》、《经济学人》、彭博社和《南华早报》等,都跟进报导。 不过,日前通讯与新闻部长新闻秘书何慧玲,则致函彭博社和《南华早报》,抨击两家媒体对于我国《防假消息法》的报导不实,也重申我国没利用该法钳制言论自由。 彭博社指我国代表积极驳斥外媒报导 彭博社在去年12月27日,刊载一则《新加坡为捍卫防假消息法采全球攻势》(Singapore Goes on Global Offensive to Defend ‘Fake…