In the court hearing on Wednesday for the challenge launched by the lawyers of blogger Amos Yee Pang Sang, 16, to vary his bail conditions such as the blanket ban for him to post on any social media platforms.

Amos was charged on 31 March for uploading an obscene image online and content with the intention to wound the religious feelings of Christians. Earlier, he was also charged under the Protection from Harassment Act 2014 as it “contained remarks about Mr Lee Kuan Yew which was intended to be heard and seen by persons likely to be distressed”, however the charge has since been stood down and put on hold.

Deputy public prosecutor Hay Hung Chun told the court that the prosecution had just been notified on Tuesday that Amos’ mother had taken him to the IMH on Good Friday.

DPP Hay went to state that Amos went for two appointments but refused to go for a third.

stopped after two visits

Papers reported on the point which DPP Hay brought up and Straits Times wrote, “TEENAGE blogger Amos Yee’s parents took him to the Institute of Mental Health (IMH) to see a psychiatrist on April 3. But after two sessions, the 16-year-old refused to go anymore, it was revealed in court yesterday.”

According to Mr Vincent Law, a family counselor who previously acted as Amos’ bailor, said that he had asked Amos’ mother to arrange for Amos to continue with his psychiatric counselling since he had already gone through the prior two appointments.

However, the earliest date that IMH could give Amos’ mother was Thursday at 2pm, the same day of his bail review at 3pm.

Despite trying to ask if IMH could bring forward the appointment date, IMH said that they could not accommodate the change.

While Mr Law had intended to bring Amos to IMH as an emergency patient through the A&E department of IMH, the sequence of events which took place in the early morning that day prevented Mr Law’s plan.

On morning of the bail review, Amos broke the bail conditions by posting two blog posts on his blog and subsequently went to the Bedok Neighbourhood police post to declare that he had broken the bail condition before attending the bail review at afternoon.

Amos said “No” when being offered lower bail conditions by DPP Hay if he would accept psychiatric counseling. Mr Law said that Amos refused to take up the offer because the bail condition that he cannot post anything on social media platform or blog is still unchanged.

Mr Law added, “You should know that Amos refused bail today (Wednesday) not because he doesn’t want to continue psychiatric counselling but because he didn’t want to be gagged.”

“So there is no question or doubt he won’t go for psychiatric counselling with today’s bail.” said Mr Law

The challenge on Wednesday was dismissed in court as the judge saw no reason to vary the bail condition and Amos was placed back in police remand at Changi Prison.

Amos will be going through a two-days trial at state court for the charges he faces.

Subscribe
Notify of
16 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

陈振声:分享数据不是所有政策课题的“万灵药”

贸工部长陈振声认为,分享数据不是解决所有政策课题的“万灵药”,能赢得人民信任且确保数据获得客观分析也很重要。 然而,他又期望在挑战和政策议题上,能和国人有更深入的讨论。 李光耀公共政策学院政策研究所,于昨日举办2020年度新加坡透视论坛。陈振声在对话会上回答与会者提问时,这么表示。 当时人民力量党秘书长吴明盛在会上提出,政府应提供更多数据,以促进更有建设性的政策辩论。 他指出,如果对数据有先入为主的看法,就可能以特定的角度诠释之。 此前陈振声与工人党议员毕丹星,针对国内PMET就业课题在国会交锋。他以此为例,永久公民的就业数据看起来较好,结果有者就指“政府不关心公民”,或者偏好永久居民等。 指民主党对人力部数据“断章取义” 此外,民主党也被点名,该党此前被人力部发出指示要求更正网络贴文。陈振声指出,尽管都有提供数据,但被“断章取义”(truncated)。 他认为,有数据是好事,但也必须客观地看待,“如果人们都不相信你,你给再多的数据也无法赢得民心。” 此外,他也列举出对新加坡政治体系的三大愿望,其中之一就是希望对于国家挑战和政策议题,能和国人有更深层次的讨论。其二是希望新加坡人需对外部局势能更加了解,以及维持为下一代着想做决策的精神。  

酝酿社会分化加剧的“超富”新加坡社会

国内贫富之间加剧扩大的鸿沟,致使越来越多国人不禁思考,这片土地是否仍是最初为之流汗、为后代子孙奋斗的”应许之地“,还是越发变成了少数”利益相关者“高处不胜寒的巨塔? 上周四,瑞士信贷研究院(Credit Suisse Research Institute)发布2018年全球财富报告,指新加坡人的整体财富增加7.4%至1.3万亿美元(约1.8万亿新元)。每名成年人的财富增加5.3%至28万3000美元以上,全球排名第九、亚洲领先。 在2000年,成年人均财富为11万4720美元。报告指财富增值主要因素包括较高的储蓄、资产增值和2005年至2012年间的币值汇率增值。 此外,新加坡的百万富翁增加了11.2巴仙,即18万3737人。也预测未来五年该人数将以每年增加5.5巴仙,达到23万9640人。 直至今年中,我国有大约1千名财富超过5千万美元的超高净值人士,人数增加了1.1巴仙。不过,未知有关统计是否也把我国高薪内阁成员涵括在“超高净值—疯狂巨富”群体中。 正当有些人浸淫在所谓“新加坡人变得富足”的自我感觉良好,《南华早报》在采访本地学者的报导中,却提出令人不安的事实–我国社会面临不断增长的社会分化。 会遗传的贫富差距 新加坡国立大学社会学系副教授陈恩赐,在接受《南华早报》采访时表示,现在在我国,阶级和身份背景对于社会流动的影响更大。根据衡量收入差距的基尼系数(从零到一,一为最不平等),我国自1980年以来的基尼系数就一直在0.40分以上波动,在去年则达到0.417分。 英国2015年度基尼系数为0.52、美国0.506,香港在2016年得分0.539,显示在先进国中的收入不均问题迫在眉睫。…

How would Hoh Kah Leong interpret Goh Chok Tong's resignation after being elected in GE 1991?

the following is Mr Low Thia Khiang’s response to Forum letter on…

“民选议员提出项目要败选者批准” 余振忠:对民主的何等荒谬和嘲弄

“民选国会议员提出的社区项目,却要由败选候选人批准,这对于我们的民主是何等荒谬和嘲弄。拖延或无视追问只为耍手段,也令那些需要使用这些设施的居民不便。” 工人党议员毕丹星和阿裕尼集选区基层组织顾问蔡荣良,此前为了选区内无障碍斜坡工程项目,隔空骂战。如今工人党前非选区议员余振忠,也加入战围,抨击受人民委托的选区议员提出项目,还要败选候选人批准,实为“荒谬”和对民主的嘲弄。 余振忠回忆,即便自己未投身政治前,就已对这种为了选票而做翻新的举动感到恼火,甚至还曾为此写信到《海峡时报》论坛力陈此弊端。项目动用的是纳税人的钱,但这种机制就形同要挟居民,迫使他们投票给执政党。 他强调,新加坡应该是属于新加坡人的,而不是人民行动党,即便和许多国人一样,他感谢开国先贤们对良好经济发展的贡献,但不代表人民认同,以不民主的手段来巩固自身权力。 而人民如果选择让行动党继续执政,也应该是基于他们自发的选择,而不是因为本身的福祉被要挟。 2011年至2015年余振忠担任非选区议员,他很清楚自己没有权限动用如切单选区的人民协会或设施,也肯定没办法像蔡荣良那样,有权力审批社区项目。 他提及两周前,《海时》编辑蔡美芬提醒,行动党如过于蛮横恐怕会招致反弹。这番话可能是对第四代领导,对付本地剧作家异议的手段有微词。但同样的道理也适用在上述批准社区项目的机制问题,以及其他过度行使政治霸权而排除人民的事项。 “新加坡应该属于新加坡人的,不是任何政党。我们不应该容许这种霸权,透过不合理和不民主的手段来要挟新加坡人。” 毕丹星称提出体制问题 此前,工人党阿裕尼集选区议员毕丹星,抱怨选区内“一个简单、数月就可完工的无障碍斜坡,搞到要几年才完成。有多少乐龄人士、行动不便人士或康复者,无法从这类设施受益?” 他质疑行动党如何决定人民协会在反对党选区运作?也抱怨反对党议员提出的提案,往往都被人协忽略。 对此,蔡荣良,在本月19日发文反驳,表示对毕丹星对于上述无障碍斜坡项目发表不实言论“感遗憾”,也质疑后者借此事转移对工人党市镇会官司的注意。他也反驳毕丹星指因为是反对党的提案所以延迟的说法。…