Singapore human rights group MARUAH has issed a statement to state it’s concerns about the Media Development Authority’s decision to close down The Real Singapore.

MARUAH’s Ppresident, Ms Braema Mathi, said that MDA should have identified to the TRS editors the specific content that was objectionable and gave them the right to justify why a shut down was not warranted, and for MDA to clearly justify its position.

The statement is appended in full below.


maruah

The suspension of The Real Singapore’s licence to operate raises important issues on the freedom of speech.

As a human rights organisation, MARUAH is deeply concerned with these, and recognises the complexities of reconciling the need for space for free expression and the need for responsible speech.

Much of the content of The Real Singapore goes against what we have championed, namely equality and non-discrimination.

The Real Singapore’s sensational journalism and encouragement of xenophobia against foreign workers do, indeed, have to be tackled.

However, the Media Development Authority’s (MDA) draconian measures are not the best way to do so, as they legitimise excessive intervention by the state and set a precedent for the diminution of our online space.

The draconian measures are also problematic in terms of their implementation.

As some people have pointed out, some other sites have been just as guilty in stirring hatred, but have been spared punishment.

We suggest that due process and natural justice require that the MDA, at a minimum, notify the editors of The Real Singapore of the specific items of content that the MDA believes to be unlawful, give them a reasonable opportunity to show why the site should not be ordered shut, and provide clear and detailed written grounds for its decision.

In particular, the MDA should explain why it decided to take action against The Real Singapore but not other sites that have published similar content, and why it believes the entire website had to be taken down instead of just the specific articles that it appropriately determines to be unlawful.

We also recommend that government officials openly and publicly engage bloggers and newsmakers of different ilk on an ongoing basis, to develop a better understanding of each other and to enable the Government to respond to inaccuracies and falsehoods in a more timely and effective manner.

The diversity of Singapore’s populace is reflected in the diversity of opinions online.

Censoring an entire platform without due process does Singapore and Singaporeans no favours, however much we may dislike its approach or the things it publishes.

Braema Mathi (Ms)
President, MARUAH Singapore

Subscribe
Notify of
59 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

COVID-19 vaccine: Russia’s hastened vaccine trial sparks controversy, Indonesia commences clinical trial of China-made vaccine, UK partners with Novavax

The world is anticipating the availability of a suitable COVID-19 vaccine soon…

王乙康回应耶鲁-国大取消异议课程事件 亚菲言脸书澄清数点

上月中旬,耶鲁—国大学院临时取消一门名为《新加坡的异议与抵抗》的课程。有关课程将由新加坡知名剧作家亚菲言(Alfian Sa’at),与参与学生探讨本土的公民抗命模式。 此后美国耶鲁大学总校对此展开调查,包括耶鲁—国大教员以及原本负责策划课程的亚菲言(Alfian Sa’at)会面,了解来龙去脉,表示课程没有影响学术自由与开放审视,取消课程是考虑到学术要求和法律问题。 对此,包括宏茂桥集选区议员殷丹博士、马林百列集选区议员谢健平、官委议员特斯拉博士和王丽婷等人,都对此事深表关注,在国会作出提问,质问课程遭腰斩的原因,或此举是否意味着对学府内的学术环境更为受控和僵化? 教育部长王乙康在回答议员提问时则解释,“本地学府被用来进行党派政治平台,表达对政府异议,不是空穴来风”,而教育部了解有关课程后也表达了担忧。 他说,课程也让学生参观芳林公园和展示示威标语,而这可能让学生面对触法的风险。 此外,邀请社运分子范国瀚、施兰巴莱等曾因公共秩序有关罪行被定罪的人物;以及邀请《新叙事》的负责人覃炳鑫和韩俐颖等人,他指两人接受“外国资金”。 王乙康似乎对亚菲言近日来在脸书发表的贴文做功课,他引述亚菲言在本月5日(周六)的贴文,指后者提到复兴“新加坡学生运动”,特别是在“政治自觉化”等领域。 实际上,亚菲言的原贴文是指,耶鲁国大有许多学生关心他的近况,他赞扬许多大学生都很聪明敏锐,并且受到强烈道德正义感驱使。他认为,这似乎某种程度上有一部分,是源于新加坡学生运动的复兴,特别是在政治自觉、气候变化、性别权益等领域。 王乙康称:“负责有关课程的个人可以保有对新加坡的看法,甚至公开在社交媒体,但我们是否应让这种政治异议存在于我们的教育中?” 有者认为学府享有学术自由,培养学生批判精神,甚至异议能有助促进民主。但王乙康指出,考量所有因素和涉及的人物,会发现“这是有动机和目的的课程”。…

包括一新企旗下公司 印尼政府29种植企业

上周六(14日),我国空气污染指数(PSI)在下午4时一度突破100点,也是三年来首次进入不健康水平。 不仅是马来西亚,我国也受烟霾问题的影响。不过印尼政府则在本月13日宣布,指该国政府已封锁包括马国和新加坡在内29家种植公司。 隶属马国的四家油棕公司,分别是森那美种植集团的子公司Sime Indo Agro、IOI集团的子公司Sukses Karya Sawit 、嘉隆发展集团的子公司Rafi Kamajaya Abadi,以及吉隆坡甲洞的子公司Adei Plantation and…

社媒帖文提醒民众勿受骗 网友揭姑姑丧礼竟被诈骗份子利用

已故亲人的遗照,被他人用做拖延交货、逃避的借口,网友在被受害者告知时方知有关事件,倍感错愕,也在脸书发帖揭发这种诈骗手段提醒众人。 事主Twinity Ong日前接获一民众的求助信息,希望事主能帮忙联系上一名供应商“亲戚”。 该民众自称是一名买家,和这位供应商“亲戚”有很大笔交易,但是两人自最后一次会面后就没有再见面。 买家也透露了供应商“亲戚”的Telegram账户名字,并表示两人原定于日前见面,却因为“亲人的丧礼”而被拖延会面日期,之后就一直联络不上了。 “我们原定在今天会面(她说会安排时间),但是她整天都没有消息,而且也联系不到她。” 事主便询问买家如何确定供应商就是她的“亲戚”时,买家展示了事主所发出有关亲属过世脸书帖文截图。 这令网友非常生气,希望相关人士停止有关行为,并促请面对类似情况的网民们要提高警惕,不要轻易受骗。 “我们发现有人一直用我姑姑的丧礼照片作为拖延交货,并且骗取他人血汗钱的借口。请停止这种做法,这是非常不礼貌的!” 帖文的评论区,只见网民们不断炮轰,要求网友报警,更要求文中的受害者也报警。 此外,也有网民扬言要肉搜“诈骗分子”,但是要小心哦,肉搜并恶意公开他人隐私(doxxing)的行为,将会触犯防止骚扰修正法案。