kwon ho ping

Executive Chairman of Banyan Tree Holdings, Mr Ho Kwon Ping calls for more checks and balance on the extra-ordinary powers granted by Singapore’s Internal Security Act (ISA).

Mr Ho was formerly detained under the ISA in 1977 when he was working as a journalist for writing articles with a pro-Communist slant.

In his lecture on security and sustainability, Mr Ho touched on the controversial issue of preventive detention which has been heavily criticized by Western governments and NGO’s.

It is however noted that preventive detention has become accepted as a necessary means by countries especially after the September 11 attack in United States of America.

Mr Ho said on Thursday that the concern of the potential abuse of the ISA does not imply a distrust of the current government and the People’s Action Party but a newly-elected, non-PAP government might be a cause for worry.

“Potential abuse resides in any government with unconstrained powers, regardless of political heritage or ideology.”

Mr Ho went on to state that his primary concern is that preventive detention must not be unconstrained and must have checks and balances which serve the legitimate purposes of security agencies whilst making abuse more difficult, if not entirely impossible.

Giving an example of the reduction of the current two year detention period to an initial one year period which is still unconditional and unconstrained.

But he noted that subsequent detention periods could require a higher degree of external review, with two high court justices rather than the current single judge and two persons appointed by the President.

“Failure to achieve unanimous approval for further detention would trigger a process of further review by for example, a non-partisan panel comprising members of the legislature. There could also be a cap on the maximum number of consecutive detention periods unless specifically approved by a similar legislative panel.”

Mr Ho acknowledges while such measures cannot fully prevent abuse by an all-powerful government, but true national security threats and abuses could be differentiated in a parliamentary system with at least some opposition representation and brought to public attention.

In his finals words on the issue of preventive detention, Mr Ho cautioned that people should be constantly aware of the peril for surrendering too much extra-ordinary powers to any government.

“A society which allows preventive detention should be acutely aware of the risks this brings to its hard-won, much-cherished freedoms and civil liberties. It must reflect deeply on the need for a balance between a government requiring extra-ordinary powers to deal with extra-ordinary threats, and a civil society requiring space to freely express its views without fear of detention.”


 

Singapore’s ISA is an act which allows the government to detain people without trial if they are deemed to pose a threat to national security.

Preventive_detention_procedure_under_the_Internal_Security_Act_(Cap_143,_1985_Rev_Ed,_Singapore)
Current preventive detention procedure under ISA

 

The act originates from the Malayan ISA which was first drafted in the Malaya on 1960 to replace the Preservation of Public Security Ordinance 1955. When Singapore joined the Federation of Malaya in 1963, the Malayan ISA was extended to Singapore. The Act was retained in Singapore even after its separation from Malaysia in 1965.

In 1989, the drafter of the Malayan ISA, Hugh Hickling commented that he “could not imagine then that the time would come when the power of detention, carefully and deliberately interlocked with Article 149 of the Constitution, would be used against political opponents, welfare workers and others dedicated to nonviolent, peaceful activities”. But although Hickling had questioned the application of the act, he changed his mind in the wake of worldwide terrorist attacks such as 9/11.

Subscribe
Notify of
4 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

涨消费税为支付医疗教育 王瑞杰:绝非轻率决定

财政部长王瑞杰于星期四(2月28日)的国会总结预算案辩论上指出,宣布消费税将调涨,是为了支持医疗保健,以及其他部门入学前教育和国安方面的需求。 面对西海岸集选区议员胡美霞,促政府尽可能推迟上调消费税时,王瑞杰指出,新加坡已有足够资金应付各种未来支出,如用于支付立国一代配套(Merdeka Generation Package)以及用于未来基设支出的借贷,可以提供足够的财政空间,来延迟消费税的上调。 然而,他强调医疗保健上的支出,和政府所准备的立国一代配套拥有完全不同的规模和性质。 “我很欣赏胡美霞议员的建议。我向她和本会议员保证,我们并没有轻率地决定上调消费税。作为政府,我们有责任预测和规划未来的需求。过程中,我们需要区分一次性因素和潜在的结构性增长。” 收入需有结构性增长 王瑞杰概述了卫生部预计在2019年就将耗费61亿新元,以便通过让所有新加坡人享有的永久性计划来补贴病患的账单。他强调,有关的花费还不包括加强医疗设施的花费和开发更有效治疗的研究开支。 “随着人口老化,永久医疗保健计划和医疗系统等其他部分的支出,也将继续结构性的增加。” 他指出,筹备有关的资金致使我们的运营收入,需要结构性的增长。 “换句话说,我们的医疗支出基数正在上升。在这个不断增长的基本计划上,我们还为我们的建国一代和立国一代提供了特别配套。” 他表示,每个面对人口老化问题的社会,都面对了类似的结构性支出压力。他引述了最近经合组织(OECD)关于公共卫生花费上升的文章,文章表明到2060年,经合组织国家政府的中位数需要国内生产总值(GDP)的6.5巴仙额外收入。…

“Dog-whistling” and “pitch-forking” only serves to alienate, says Prof Donald Low

The “scurrilous” attack on Workers’ Party (WP) chief and MP Pritam Singh…

SDP responds to Vivian Balakrishnan

The Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) has responded to the People’s Action Party’s…

AHPETC fined $800 for holding trade fair without approval from NEA

Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC) has been fined $800 by the courts…