mills

There is an “extraordinary degree of ageism” in the workplace here in Singapore, said Mr Victor Mills, the chief executive officer of the Singapore International Chamber of Commerce.

In an interview with the Straits Times, Mr Mills was asked “how big of a problem” was ageism in Singapore, an issue which Mr Mills has campaigned against.

“Many talented people above 40, especially PMETs (professionals, managers, executives and technicians) who lose their jobs due to economic restructuring, cannot find jobs due to an extraordinary degree of ageism here,” he said.

“HR managers would look at their CVs and think they are too senior and probably stuck in their ways. But age is not the issue here. Rather, it is their skills, experience, capabilities and, above all, their potential.

“Admittedly among this group are people who do not want to take a pay cut because they think they are going to lose face. Or they do not believe in continual learning because they think that’s for young folk. That is wrong. Those attitudes must change too.”

Mr Mills, who was born in Northern Ireland and is now a Singapore citizen, first came to Singapore 30 years ago.

“What also struck me, which we have since lost, is that Singapore was much more egalitarian and relaxed back then,” he said.

Now, he said, “a lot of values seem to have been lost” in the country’s “headlong rush for more money”.

“The level of materialism – what you wear, where you live, what you drive, what you wear on your wrist – has become a key determinant of the value of human life,” he said. “This is absolute nonsense.”

Mr Mills said that “[there] are lots and lots of people – more than before – who feel that life, their employer and the Government owe them a living.”

“This has manifest itself in an overfussiness or a sense of entitlement which businesses, whether large or small, foreign or local, have been telling me about,” he explained.

But, he said, there are “hundreds of thousands of my fellow citizens who do a fabulous job, day in and day out.”

The issue of age discrimination in Singapore has been previously raised, both in the media and by Members of Parliament – and from Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam as well.

“For our older PMEs, (those who are) middle-aged especially, once they lose their jobs, some of them find it tough to get back in,” Mr Tharman said in 2013.

“And I believe there’s an element of age discrimination that we have to tackle,” he added.

In 2014, it was the Speaker of Parliament, Halimah Yaacob, who raised the matter.

“We are still very much an ageist society,” she told the Straits Times in an interview. “Sometimes people may not even know that they are being ageist.”

“I receive a lot of feedback from elderly job applicants and they say it is very difficult for them to get a job because sometimes when they call up an employer, when the employer asks for their age, and then when they inform the employer what their age is, the employer immediately says, okay, the vacancy has been filled.”

In 2013, Workers’ Party MP for Aljunied GRC, Chen Show Mao, raised the issue in Parliament and asked the Manpower Minister, Tan Chuan-jin, what the Government would do “in order to determine and quantify the nature of the problem.”

Mr Tan replied that the Government works through the Tripartite Alliance for Fair Employment Practices or TAFEP and took a “moral suasion approach to encourage fair employment practices.”

He said that in the preceding three years, TAFEP received 151 age-related discrimination complaints.

“Thus far, employers approached by TAFEP have heeded TAFEP’s advice and made adjustments to their employment practices, for example by removing age criteria from job advertisements,” Mr Tan said.

“Addressing age discrimination is more of an ongoing journey than a destination, and requires the concerted efforts of all members of Singapore society,” he added.

Subscribe
Notify of
21 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

British researchers reveal alarming map of where Wuhan travellers went before the lockdown

A group of British researchers have generated a predictive global risk map…

高庭驳回迪哥达索取警方录供的刑事动议

本月3日,大法官梅达顺在高庭驳回了本社总编许渊臣,以及被控刑事诽谤男子迪哥达的刑事动议。 检控官拒绝公开两人此案中的警方录供,他们个别针对此事提呈刑事动议。 不过,梅达顺在口头陈述判决依据时表明,提呈在他眼前的凭据,未能说服他要求高庭审核国家法院裁决的最高门槛已达到。 早前,迪哥达辩护律师拉维,依循刑事诉讼法(CPC)第22条文,要求控方在开审前出示迪哥达的口供,但遭国家法院法官驳回。 至于许渊臣辩护律师朱正熙,强调许渊臣此前录的口供,能力助此案,因为当时当局并没有盘问被告,确认他是否有诽谤内阁的意图,以及他是否认为文章陈述是中立或不利的。 梅达顺则认为,辩方大可在上诉时提及此事,惟朱正熙也指出有凸显程序错误的重要;梅达顺也提醒检控官,考量有关口供是否和辩方有关联。 拉维律师则提及,早在开审前,检控官就已知道被告索取有关口供,但当时对方就已拒绝。可是控方仍辩解被告可走刑事案件披露会议(Criminal Case Disclosure Conference,简称CCDC)程序,但依据《刑事诉讼法》第159条文,却需要征得控辩双方同意。 一开始控方就拒绝让被告索取口供,对此拉维更形容控方的上述建议,形同让被告做“徒劳之举”(原文:go on…

Focus on Healthcare – Part 4: How we stack up internationally

Focus on Healthcare is a five-part series that provides a critical analysis…