By Gangasudhan
Singapore Press Holdings (SPH) held its Annual General Meeting (AGM) on Tuesday at the SPH News Centre, where its chairman, Dr Lee Boon Yang, gave an outline of the group’s performance to the shareholders.
Contrasting against “rather unsettled economic conditions globally”, he described the net profit of $404.3 million earned as “creditable” although this was 6.2% less than its performance in FY2013. He also noted that, “Higher contributions from property, magazines, exhibitions, radio and online classifieds helped to cushion the drop in our Newspaper contribution.”
While he said that circulation of all newspapers under the SPH banner grew by 1.7% to 1.07 million copies, with The Straits Times in particular registering a 2.2% growth to reach a circulation of 459,300 copies island-wide (inclusive of more than 100,000 in digital subscriptions), the profitably of its newspaper and magazine business declined by a significant 16% (or $47 million) as compared to FY2013, attributed in particular to the drop in advertisement revenue by 6.8% (or S$51.3 million) and circulation revenue by 4.9% (or S$9.7 million).
SPH AGM slide 1
In terms of staffing, it was revealed at the AGM that at least 135 positions were trimmed, representing 3.1% of the SPH workforce of over 4,000. However, this did not translate into cost savings and the manpower cost rose by 7.1% from $349,643 in FY2013 to $374,519 in FY2014, “mainly due to salary increments, higher bonus costs including a one-off special bonus for prior year (S$10.4m) arising from REIT profit and incentive to drive growth.”
SPH AGM slide 2
SPH’s growth appears to be fuelled by all its non-newspaper businesses, particularly its property investments which registered a 7.6% increase from FY2013’s earnings. The group owns The Seletar Mall, Paragon and The Clementi Mall, and Dr Lee said he was “pleased that the REIT unit price has performed well, reflecting the good performance of the business” with rental reversions of 8.5% a contributing factor.
SPH also has an investible fund amounting to $1.9 billion – broken into Equities (28.4%), Investment Funds (37.4%), Cash & Deposits (14.6%) and Bonds (19.6%) – which registered a 4.5% growth from the preceding year.
Moving forward in its primary business, the chairman revealed that a $100-million-dollar fund has been set up (i.e. New Media Fund) as a dedicated investment vehicle for securing media-related businesses. In addition, SPH is entering the education sector by securing a 22% stake in Mindchamps Holdings for $12 million.
Finally, there was some movement in the board of directors, with Professor Cham Tao Soon (founding chancellor and chairman of SIM University) and Mr Sum Soon Lim (Corporate Advisor of Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited) stepping down to be replaced by Mr Tan Chin Hwee (founding partner in Asia for Apollo Global Management) and Ms Janet Ang (Managing Director of IBM Singapore).
While the newcomers were voted in at 99% of the shareholder votes, and Ms Chong Siak Ching (President and Chief Executive Officer of Ascendas Pte Ltd) was reelected at 98%, one director, Mr Lucien Wong Yuen Kuai (Chairman and Senior Partner of Allen & Gledhill LLP), received a lower 92% of the shareholder votes.
The presentation slides, the chairman’s speech and resolutions adopted at the AGM are available online at the SPH website.

Subscribe
Notify of
9 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

替父母伪造解雇信骗疫情薪金补贴 男子被判监禁三个月

为了骗取政府三个月的冠状病毒19薪金补贴,男子伪造母亲和父亲的解雇信函,遭当局揭发后被控上庭,昨日(9月17日)被判入狱三个月。 当时处于失业状况的43岁被告,爱德华(译音)昨日在庭上面对两项伪造文件控状,他认罪后被判刑。他也是首个因骗取政府冠病津贴,而被定罪的个案。 据案情指出,政府冠病疫情薪金补贴(Covid-19 Support Grant)于今年3月宣布推出,提供长达三个月,不超过800元的津贴,以协助因疫情失业、被迫拿三个月无薪假、薪水减少超过三成的中低收入社群。 被告的母亲(67岁)为饮食摊位助理,于5月4日被摊位老板以疫情为由,口头通知她被裁退,直到6月3日才发出裁员信函。而被告早已离异的厨师老爸(68岁),于3月2日到老板介绍的新东家摊位工作,但是因不喜欢环境而选择在同月9日辞职。 在得知父母亲都失业的情况后,被告就用电脑上的应用程序,将雇佣信件上的雇主签名“转移”到所伪造的父母亲解雇信函内,并于5月5日和5月14日将“解雇信函”递交给社会及家庭发展部。 有关信件起初成功骗过当局,被告父亲获得了首个800元的津贴。但是当局很快发现信件的可疑之处,停止对被告父亲继续发放津贴,也没有批准被告母亲的申请。被告父亲在事发后,已经将800元交还给政府当局了。 庭上,控方指疫情津贴并非“免费钱”,是用来帮助受疫情影响而失业或失去收入的群体,但是被告却利用疫情来为父母谋取政府津贴,犯下了难以发现的罪行,法庭应该给出强烈信息以遏止类似恶性。 控方认为被告知法犯法,深知父亲不符合资格,母亲没有文件却还策划这起案件,实不可取。惟,控方指出,被告母亲其实符合了申请资格,只是在申请时段还未获得解雇信函,因此促请法官将被告判入狱三个月。 被告法官在求情时指出,被告在整件事情中并没有受惠,他所作旨在帮助失业的父母亲谋得福利,只是方式不对,因此请求法官判监刑六至八个星期。 法官最终同意控方的建议,下判被告入狱三个月,以起到警醒社会的作用。

We need to take a stand

By Ghui “Why is that law on the books? Because it’s always been…

“Homing instinct” requires fundamental shift in mentality

by Bernard In a speech at the 50th Anniversary of Tanjong Katong…

Analysts: Singapore aviation sector “extremely vulnerable” due to COVID-19

According to analysts, Singapore as an aviation hub is becoming “extremely vulnerable”…