state court entrance
Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC) has been fined $800 by the courts for holding a festive trade fair without approval from the National Environment Agency (NEA).
The penalty amount for the offense was announced on Wednesday (24 December) after the courts found the town council to be guilty of the offense on 28 November.
AHPETC, which is currently run by the Workers’ Party, was summoned by NEA under Section 35 of the Environmental Public Health Act (EPHA) for organising a Lunar New Year Fair from 10 January to 30 January this year without a valid permit from the environment agency.
District Judge Victor Yeo had earlier said in his judgement that the “mini-fair”, which consisted of stalls selling festive decorations, cookies and sweets, fruits such as pomelo, flowers and assorted potted plants, falls within the ordinary definition of a fair and the duration of the event amounted to a “temporary fair”. As such, it required a licence under Section 35 of the EPHA.
The judge added that he is convinced AHPETC’s actions was a strict liability offence, which means the prosecution does not need to prove beyond reasonable doubt that AHPETC deliberately intended to hold the fair without a permit.
The judge said the town council’s objection was related to the suitability of the application form and not the fact that a permit was required. He said the court is not an appropriate forum to examine the conditions related to the permit application form.
Throughout the course of the trial, the legal defence for AHPETC, represented by lawyer Peter Low, faced great difficulty contesting the charge by NEA, as Mr Low’s attempts to question NEA on the forms were repeatedly ruled irrelevant by the presiding judge.
From documents submitted by the defence, the only document which seems to have prevented AHPETC from obtaining the permit was the letter of approval from the Citizens’ Consultative Committee (CCC) run by a representative from the People’s Action Party.
Mr Low had also argued that the town council did not require a permit to hold events such as “mini-fairs” in the common space of the town council according to the Town Council Act.
The judge however said in his judgement earlier in November that he is not convinced of the defence’s argument that AHPETC can hold events without a permit in common areas that it manages according to Section 18 of the Town Council Act. He noted that AHPETC did not raise this up as an issue in the corresponding emails leading up to the event held in January this year.
He also noted that the town council had the option of not holding the event before it obtain the relevant permit from NEA and it is an undisputed fact that the town council held the fair despite not obtaining the permit.
On the question of footing the bill for the legal fees, AHPETC Vice Chairman Pritam Singh had earlier said in November that no town council funds were used for this case. “The MPs are contributing to the lawyers’ fees,” Mr Png Eng Huat added.
AHPETC said in a statement that while it respects the court’s decision and have paid the fine of $800 but it is not satisfied with the outcome of the case.
The town council further noted that the State Court has declined to rule on whether NEA’s requirements are valid and reasonable. It will be consulting its lawyers to study the options to pursue these matters in the High Court.

Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

All incoming travellers must now wear an electronic device during their 14-day SHN outside of dedicated facilities

An additional measure of wearing an electronic device for the 14 days…

从澳洲邮寄包裹抵狮城“半路失踪” 事主索偿新邮政仅赔150元

从澳洲邮寄包裹,一路到新加坡都顺利无事,还没送到事主手上却在新邮政处理中心“半路失踪”,且经过一个月后仅同意赔偿150元,令事主感到不可理喻。 事主法塔(Fatah Kent)申诉,上月10日,他透过网络从澳洲订购了价值1千551.57澳元的包裹,而澳洲卖家在上月30日寄出。 根据事主张贴的包裹行踪记录,他的包裹在本月2日抵达新加坡的处理中心,但是在同日的下午12时04分,记录却显示“无法寄送,认证文件未备妥”。 事主对此感到困惑,联系客服时得知出现失误,并请事主等候三天,但三天过去了,却没有收到任何更新近况。 “我再打给他们,又让我等多两天。四天过去了还是没有消息。我再联系他们时却叫我跟卖家索偿。” 他说,与他在电话里交谈的服务人员Shachi Gaur告诉他,包裹在处理中心丢失。事主要求全额赔偿,但对方指新邮政的政策是赔偿卖家。 这令事主感到不可理喻,指出卖家透过澳洲邮寄公司寄到新加坡都没有问题,但包裹却在新邮政经手时丢失,明显这是新邮政的失误。 经过激烈争辩,服务人员又把球踢给经理,隔日一名社交媒体团队主管打给他,又和事主重复了同样的信息。经事主抗议下,这名主管说另一位经理Suvam Chatterjee隔日会打给他,但对方的说辞还是一样,仅表示调查还在进行并会向事主更新近况。 “后来他告诉我他们会特别通融赔偿事主,要我提供包裹发票和相关稳健,我也照做了,希望他们能全额赔偿。”…

抵新出席国际会议 韩国男确诊患新冠病毒

昨日(4日),邻国马来西亚卫生部长祖基菲里证实,马国一名41岁男子,于上月16日到新加坡出席会议,回国后出现症状,一周后即本月3日,获证实感染新型冠状病毒(武汉肺炎)。 该名男子出席上月16日至23日,在君悦大酒店(Grand Hyatt Hotel)举行的会议,与会者也包括中国籍代表。 根据韩国《韩联社》报导,韩国新增的第17和第18起病例,其中一位38岁韩国男子,也同样曾在18日至24日期间,前来新加坡参与国际会议,并曾与上述马国确诊者接触和感染。 据报导,获悉自己曾接触过的马国人确诊,上述韩国男子也立即前往就医,结果确诊自己也被感染。 据了解卫生部目前仍在调查,上述来君悦酒店开会的马国男子,仍在调查他在何时何处感染;该酒店则采取措施,对客房和会议场所等进行清洁。

Interactive pump price comparison website introduced by CASE

On Monday (13 Jan), the Consumer Association of Singapore (CASE) launched a…