By Property Soul
On December 5, the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS) announced the reduction of property tax for HDB flats in 2015. Three days later, there was an article “Property Tax cut for one in four private home owners” in The Straits Times. A week after their announcement, a representative from IRAS further elaborated how annual values are calculated in The Straits Times Forum (“Annual values of homes reflect market rents“; Dec 15).
Below are my two cents contribution after being a private home property tax payer for twelve years, with an attempt to demystify the five common myths of property tax.
1. Lower annual value does not necessarily mean lower property tax.
According to IRAS, effective Jan 1 next year, the annual value of 25.7 percent private homes has been reduced while only 1.4 percent has been adjusted upwards.
However, IRAS has implemented progressive tax rates for owner-occupied private residential properties since 1 Jan 2011. A property tax rate of 4 percent of annual value applies unless the annual value is over $65,000 (6 percent tax rate applies). For non-owner occupied properties, new progressive tax rates are implemented since 1 Jan 2014.
By end of November, owners should have received a letter from IRAS, informing them the revised progressive property tax structure for both owner-occupied and non-owner occupied private residential properties.
For rental properties, the brackets of annual values are narrower, with upward adjustment on the percentages of tax rates that ranges from 10 to 20 percent. Even if you are one of the lucky ones with a lower annual value for your property, you may still end up paying more property tax next year.
2. Annual values are not only reviewed annually.
The December 8 article in The Straits Times mentions that “some feel that the volatility in the property market cannot be captured by annual reviews”. Together with the statement from IRAS about the property tax relief of property owners, it gives the wrong impression that annual values of properties are reviewed once a year. If there are changes, they will be made effective at the beginning of every year.
However, besides end of every year, in the past I have received notices from IRAS in March, August and October about changes in annual value. And it is not unusual to have two adjustments in one year’s time.
3. Owners may not be notified of changes in advance.
Unlike any hike in bank interest rates for your housing loans, you won’t receive a notification telling you in advance that the new rates will be effective from next month and changes in repayments will be reflected in the following month.
IRAS usually gives owners one month’s notice. However, on two other separate occasions, the new annual value was being made effective immediately. One letter I received in mid-December had the new annual value backdated to November. Another one sent in early March backdated the change from February.
4. Annual value does not reflect the performance of the rental market.
Property tax is calculated by the annual value of the property. And annual value is estimated based on the rental transactions of similar properties nearby.
In other words, the annual value of your property is determined by the rentals of comparable homes, not the performance of the prevailing rental market.
There are currently 285,000 private residential properties in Singapore. From 1 Jan 2015, only 25.7 percent will have their annual value lowered. Do you think that only one in four private property owners are affected by the slowdown of the rental market?
Below is a chart that shows the annual values of four of my private residential properties as compared to the URA Rental Index from 2002 to 2014. You can see that three properties have their annual values reduced slightly only once throughout the years. For most of the time, they climb up in big steps.
my_property_tax
5. Not all private residential properties are created equal.
Property tax is a wealth tax based on property ownership. The pricier the property you buy, the higher the rental it can generate, and the more property tax you need to pay. Depending on the annual value, the new property tax rate for non-owner occupied properties ranges from 10 to 20 percent.
If your property is in an affluent neighborhood, there are chances that your neighbors have newly renovated their flat or built a swimming pool. The good rent they fetch can inevitably result in a higher annual value for your property.
In a bad economy, it is difficult to find tenants with good budget. High-end properties are therefore most susceptible to high vacancy rate in a slow rental market. However, annual value is the same whether a property is self-occupied, tenanted or vacant. Despite the fact that you don’t have a tenant to help you pay for your mortgage and maintenance fee, you still have to settle with a high property tax.
From 1 Jan 2014, landlords of non-owner occupied properties can no longer claim any refund of property tax for an unoccupied property. The same apply for properties unable to rent out or undergoing repairs.
Lastly, if you find the annual value of your property unreasonably high, you can appeal to IRAS to raise your objection. However, you have to be prepared that the subsequent adjustment can be lower, the same, or even higher.
As what our previous speaker Mr Leung Yew Kwong, Principal Tax Consultant at KPMG Services, told the The Straits Times,

“It’s not that the process is not transparent … it’s impossible for IRAS to go into every home to access the condition it is in.”

Remember the famous saying from Benjamin Franklin?

“In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.”

 This article was first published at propertysoul.com

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

何廷儒辣玉莎坐月子 刘程强等人代为照看选区

盛港集选区议员何廷儒与辣玉莎,分别在上月31日和本月1日分别顺利产子,目前仍在休养中。 工人党领袖发挥团队精神,已卸下议员职的前党魁刘程强,今早在工人党秘书长毕丹星陪同下,一同走访何廷儒与辣玉莎的万国(Buangkok)及康埔桦(Compassvale)分区。 何廷儒也在脸书发文感谢刘程强,欣见老人家仍看起来精神奕奕,也乐于联络基层居民。毕丹星也分享,本周稍早前,主席林瑞莲和李丽连也协助主持家访和会见人民活动。 在何廷儒辣玉莎两人待产时,毕丹星已表示,她们每周的接见选民活动、家访和走访选区等工作,将交由该党成员轮流协助。 该党前党魁刘程强、方荣发、李丽连、陈俊元、佘雪玲、余振忠、符策涫,以及何廷儒的丈夫陈励正等人,也会从旁提供援助。

Netizens highlight double standard in opposition-led constituencies after MP Jamus Lim wasn’t invited to present Edusave award to student

The Workers’ Party (WP) Member of Parliament (MP) for Sengkang GRC Jamus…

半年来13工地接停工令 玛格烈通道工地爆56骨痛热症病例

女皇镇玛格烈通道一组屋工地内,有56名工人相继感染骨痛热症,承包商据悉已经被罚款扣分。此外,有13个工地在过去五个月,因有黑斑蚊滋生地而被下令停工。 环境局加强骨痛热症防疫措施,敦促建筑业给予合作,并且对没有妥善处理建筑工地环境问题,导致黑斑蚊滋生的建筑工地承包商采取严厉行动。有关的对付行动包括了发出停工指令,以及法院起诉。 被下令停工的工地,承包商必须采取必要的纠正行为,包括整理环境、清理杂草等,有效审查现场卫生和病媒控制程序后,才有可能获得撤除停工令。 截至目前为止,13个在过去五个月接收停工令的工地中,已有10个工地的停工令成功被撤除。 然而,玛格烈通道并不在撤除停工令行列内。截止星期一,已有56名来自该工地,在SkyResidence组屋工地工作并居住的外国客工的工人感染上蚊疫。环境局证实在重复稽查时,发现工地蚊虫大量滋生,因此发出停工令,要求该工地承包商采取行动。 其中一名被下令停工的工地主管表示,工地内至今已经有49人染病,接获停工令后暂停了所有工作,当前只能进行整理、收拾等防范工作。 对此,建屋局证实有关消息,并指相关承包商已经被罚款和记分,将会配合当局,一起执行严格的害虫控制和管理措施。 环境局表示在玛格烈通道被列为蚊疫黑区后,当局多次到场稽查并寻获七个黑斑蚊温床,包括在护土墙、金属模板、树洞和安全栅栏等。

针对防假消息草案 媒体从业员发联署声明

本地一群前任和现役的主流及网络媒体从业员,于昨日发表公开联署声明,对于《防止网络假消息籍网络操纵法》在本月1日提呈国会一读感到遗憾,提出对该法的忧虑和反对。 联署声明担忧,新法将进一步侵害言论自由,打击媒体从业员的工作。同时认为政府未珍视新兴数码新闻行业,理应更积极与媒体从业员联手抗衡假消息。再者,也可能令政府问责遭削弱。 有关声明也转寄给所有国会议员,以期下月召开国会议员们参与防止假消息法案辩论时,对问题有更深入了解。 这批媒体从业员认为,防假消息法构成的问题包括: 侵害言论自由,并没有清楚区分何谓事实、意见观点和假消息之间的差别; 政府更为被动,而不是更积极与媒体联手抗衡假消息; 法案赋予政府的权利缺乏监督机制,使之有被执政政府滥用的可能。 这批媒体从业员认为,落实防假消息法将对本土言论自由构成直接和长期的伤害、阻碍公民思辨的发展,也侵蚀民间对政府的信任。 声明中提出三点关注: 关注一:防假消息法是对言论自由的侮辱 新加坡政府特别是律政部一再强调,防假消息法旨在保障言论自由,意见观点不会被对付。然而,敬业的媒体从业员为了让读者更深入了解政府政策,也常需要引进不同人士观点或可能和政府相左的数据或分析。但新法似乎未能清楚阐释,谨慎分析的观点会否与法案相冲突。 再者,法案第一部分第2(2)条文,对于假消息陈述的定义也过于笼统模糊,假设记者报导引用政府提供的事实,惟记者提出异议,会否被法案对付?…