Leung Chun-ying - GovHKBy Dinesh Dayani

“Democracy would see poorer people dominate Hong Kong vote.” – Hong Kong Chief Executive, Leung Chun-ying

What if the PAP had said what Hong Kongs Chief Executive said?
A few weeks ago, the Chief Executive of Hong Kong said that poor people would dominate the Hong Kong polls if the government yielded to the demands of the protesters.
Let us take a step back and analyse what this really means, and why a person in the decision-making seat of a country would actually utter such words. 

What economic progress is for

I wonder what the impact would have been if Singaporeans had heard anyone from the PAP utter such words publicly. I would like to think that we should have enough sense to vote them out come the next General Elections.
If the majority of the citizens were poor and only the foreigners and a selected few were rich, it is common sense that the poor would have voted the current government regime out, and to replace them with someone whom they feel would actually work for the citizens.
Ultimately, what is the purpose of economic progress for a country if its citizens do not enjoy it? This begs the next question; what is Hong Kongs economic progress for if their citizens are not the main benefactors? And there emerges one answerneither you, nor me, nor China would like to utter.
Is Singapore the next Hong Kong?
Having established that the majority of our people are not “poor” simply because the government has not been toppled (as what Hong Kong’s Chief Executive have suggested would happen), we think Singaporeans are lucky to be in control of our country. You can argue we do not have any say in policies being implemented by the government, but at least we have a say, collectively, on who we want deciding on these policies that we have no control over.
Our politicians are Singaporeans too; they are not pro (insert any other country). I like to think that they will fight to the bitter end before Singapore is pried from their cold hard fingers, which by the way is also their job. While I may not be in love with some of what we have achieved over the last 10 years, I know the governments directions were similar to mine – to better the country and enrich the people living in it.
But just what have we achieved for our citizens? More importantly, is it enough?
How much have we actually grown?
This is what we found.
Over the last 10 years, co-incidentally thats also how long Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has been in power, GDP (Gross Domestic Product) in Singapore has increased at an annual average of 6.3%. This sounds brilliant, at least on the surface.
However, between 2001 and 2007, income inequality actually worsened. Real median income of the lowest 10% declined by close to 10%, Growth of other income groups remained flat, but the highest enjoyed an average of 18.6% average wage growth.
What this means is that the rich has become richer and their wealth have grown the quickest. They have helped our country become rich through their taxes and spending. I am not sure if that’s necessarily a good or bad thing. You should decide on it for yourself.
Did the last 10 years benefit all Singaporeans even though we collectively built or accepted the MBS & IR, saw our asset prices balloon and built a whole other financial district during the time? Im not so sure.
What I am sure of however is that we are a democracy. It is in our power if we do not like the direction of where our country is headed.
Picture via GovHK.
This article was first published on Dollars and Sense, a website that aims to provide interesting, bite-sized financial articles which is relevant to the average Singaporean.

Subscribe
Notify of
26 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Gov’t insists Operation Coldstore not politically motivated

  The Singapore Government has once again claimed that Singapore’s history is…

Reform Party chief Kenneth Jeyaretnam launches new charity for poverty relief in S’pore

Reform Party chief and blogger Kenneth Jeyaretnam announced on Tuesday (5 January)…

李总理称99年屋契对下一代公平 网民问“我是买屋还是租屋?”

在本周日举行的国庆群众大会,我国总理李显龙发表演说,公布数项旨在减轻民众生活经济负担的政策。 对于民众最为关注的房屋课题,他再一次阐明公共组屋地契,为何定在99年。对他而言,99年是很长时间,即使传给孩子,到屋契到期时孩子也有80-90岁。 “当住户在同样组屋住了3、40年至退休。仍有60年屋契,仍保持良好价值,您可以选择积蓄住在该组屋,或出租增加收入,或者传承给下一代,也可以转售并购买较小的单位。” 他保证组屋99年屋契到期,不代表住户无家可归,政府会协助您找其他的组屋,可能是全新99年屋契的预购屋,或二房式灵活组屋计划供退休用。总是能根据您的需求找到合适的选择。 为下一代腾出居住空间 “但不论是哪一种选择,您必须为组屋租赁付费。这是公平的,因为你知道租约什么时候用完、什么时候必须交回给建屋局。”李显龙坚称,这是为了对下一代表示公平,您“拥有了”一间组屋,传了一两代,之后就要交回给政府,由政府重新规划,为未来世代建新的组屋。 如果政府发放永久地契,屋主可以把房子传承给许多代,但是很快我们就不够土地空间建新房子。这将导致社会被分化成拥屋一群和无能力置产的一群,这是真正的不平等。即便是私人物业,政府也只发放99年屋契。” 不过,我们也不能发现,李总理仍坚称人民是“购买”组屋,我们“拥有”一间组屋,可以传承一两代。但很肯定地,99年屋契到期,就必须交给政府重新规划。 网民Jasper Lam虽认同不应有永久地契,因为屋龄到了90年,住户也不太敢住下去。但他也提出,政府应让人民清楚屋龄和地契的重要,让价格照着屋龄走,避免人民为了买老房子,也不需付出高昂的代价。 “政府一直不愿指出这个大问题,因为影响很深,或许会影响选票”,价值多年来政府的论调都是组屋能保值、不贬值,澄清后就形同致歉的谎言被捅破。 Jasper…