roy and hui hui courtBy Andrew Loh
Two Members of Parliament (MPs) have raised questions about the use of Hong Lim Park after the 27 September incident involving the clash of two events, which has since led to charges being brought against one group of users of the park.
MP for Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC, Zainal Sapari, has filed the following question for Monday’s sitting of the House:

“To ask the Minister for National Development (a) if he can give a full account of the incident that happened at Hong Lim Park on 27 September 2014; (b) whether there has been any non-compliance by the organisers of both events in ensuring public peace; and (c) whether there is any follow-up action to ensure that such incidents will not happen again.”

MP for Moulmein-Kallang GRC, Denise Phua, is asking about the use of Speakers’ Corner and the Telok Ayer Hong Lim Green Community Centre:

“To ask the Minister for National Development (a) whether Hong Lim Park is for the sole use of Speakers’ Corner participants; (b) what designated spots in Hong Lim Park are meant for Speakers’ Corner activities; (c) what is the list of activities permitted for Hong Lim Park; (d) when and for what activities can the adjacent Telok Ayer Hong Lim Green Community Centre facilities such as the stage be allowed for use by Hong Lim Park users; (e) what standard operating procedures pertain to the use of Hong Lim Park and the adjacent Telok Ayer Hong Lim Green Community Centre’s facilities; and (f) how the recent incident pertaining to the use of the same ground by YMCA and advocates of the Return-My-CPF group can be avoided.”

The questions were directed at the Minister of National Development, Khaw Boon Wan.
Lawyer for the six protesters of the “Return Our CPF” group, M Ravi, has written to the Speaker of Parliament, Halimah Yacob, to highlight his concerns about the questions and issues raised by the MPs.
Mr Ravi said that his firm has been instructed to prepare and file an application to the High Court for leave to enter a Constitutional challenge on the Parks and Trees Act, and a formal written appeal to the Minister for National Development has also expressly reserves the Constitutional challenge.
“It is fully appreciated that in a case of this nature involving a matter that is of obvious concern to the public in general and to Members of Parliament in particular it is to be expected that there will be questions asked and issues raised for discussion in Parliament,” said Mr Ravi.
As such, he called for Mdm Halimah’s discretion in this matter.
“It will no doubt be your view, very properly, that Members will not need to be reminded that they should not utter anything on the floor of the House which would affect the evaluation of the merits of proceedings which are imminent or before the courts, or influence the result of proceedings, in particular the likelihood of an acquittal.”
Letter from M Ravi to the Speaker of Parliament

 

Subscribe
Notify of
11 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

卫生用品火红:商家售五升洗手液 引民众排队疯抢

由于武汉冠状病毒疫情的爆发,卫生或消毒用品一跃成为本地热销商品,民众也为了一瓶洗手液,宁愿七早八早就去排队,到大士区(Gul Crescent, Tuas)大排长龙,只为了购得洗手液。 近日,清洁用品供应商Klenco推出HAND RUB泡沫消毒剂 ,根据官方网站指出,其效用包括能“杀死传播病毒如艾滋病毒、疱疹以及“冠状病毒””。 商家是在16日早上9点开始销售五公升装的洗手液,且其价格也会高于正常价格的两倍,要价30元一瓶。一般而言,一瓶只需要价18元。 据该公司解释,购买会设下条件和诸多要求,是为了阻止有人从中牟取暴利,而公司也指出,他们也会捐出1万5千元给英勇基金或任何国家福利理事会(National Council of Social Service)的筹款活动。…

傅海燕:国家美术馆发展项目未涉舞弊

工人党后港选区议员方荣发今日在国会提问,根据2018/2019财年审计长报告,新加坡文化、社群及青年部 (MCCY)在国家美术馆发展项目上,有1千300万新元因为合同条款中不当的豁免,多支付给承包商,为何被审计长报告指要收回可能已太迟? 对此该部部长傅海燕则回复,在检讨审计长报告后,认为有关合约条款中的豁免未涉及舞弊。她说,该部直接拨款给新加坡美术馆公司(NGS)管理,以达到效率和节约成本效果。 她解释,新加坡美术馆公司及时完成项目,且未超过5.32亿新元预算。 “1千300万元,并不是多支付的款项,而主要是“罚款豁免”(waiver of penalty),特别是针对承包商逾时完工。” 针对审计署报告,她表示文社青部会与新加坡美术馆改进其财务和采购政策。 对此方荣发询问,是否会收回1千300万元的金额?傅海燕则再次澄清,有关款项不是多付款项,而是针对大型项目的豁免。 她称,在和新加坡美术馆仔细检讨审计署报告后,认为“没有理由进行主要的索回款项,且该部也满意有关索讨和合约变更指示,是基于良好理据。” e审计署报告指出,美术馆擅自同意改变总建筑合约中的一些条款,涉及款额1300万元。不过,拥有这个项目的文社青部迟至去年9月,也就是账款结清后的一年才向美术馆提出质疑。 审计署则责难,到那时候,即便向承包商追讨款项也太迟了。虽然这个项目由美术馆以“担保有限公司”的形式管理,但文社青部仍应设立监管机制。…