By David Tham
I refer to the Straits Times Article “Exiles in ‘To Singapore, with Love’ shouldn’t get chance to air ‘self-serving’ accounts: PM

I think the question being provoked by To Singapore with Love, is not simply about whether the exiles have a right or privilege to voice their opinion and tell their side of the story. Whether the exiles are right or wrong is not the central issue here. 

The real issue here is whether and should the Singapore government be doing more to invest in the development of local film industry stories and content. 

Why? Here are three reasons:

1) Even if Singapore bans the film, there will be other countries who will buy or show it. And there is no law that prevents Tan Pin Pin from showing it elsewhere in the world. 

The fact that Tan Pin Pin has to entertain such a niched (and some might argue, “narrow”) idea about Singapore exiles, just goes to show that there is a lack of awareness among Singaporeans about the role of modern documentary makers in civic society. The role of such documentary makers is to push the boundaries of the imagination. And where budgets are constrained or scarce, the more sensational the topic, the greater the publicity.
So the solution is not so simple: More financial support is needed for the Singaporean film documentary industry such that there is no more need to sensationalise rubbished topics. But more hands-on involvement from well-informed and well-read policy makers is needed as well.
If you want to put a leash on what people produce through film, start by building up the local industry first. Singapore has a group of independent film and documentary makers. It’s not a real industry or even a business community. Furthermore, Censorship and MDA funding policies are antiquated stick and carrot tools that are no longer effective in the age of Social Media.
2) The government’s current approach to public debate and investment (it’s not just about pumping money investment) in the local documentary film-making industry seriously needs more work to improve, even though it is currently better than Third World standards! We need more local policy makers with First World experiences/exposure to take us into the 21st Century (which is already here!).
By providing responses to the controversial documentary using the same medium and better quality storytelling, the Singaporean public would benefit from the narratives created. This is because the organic pathway of using film to argue and counter-argue will contribute to a better local Singaporean film documentary industry that has more impact on world-views. At the end of the day, the better storyteller will prevail.
If there are no counter responses through the same medium, people around the world will then only hear and see one side of the story.
What those others might think might not matter much to the current Singapore government. But many Singaporeans, including overseas Singaporeans do care. It is a reflection of what it means to be a loyal Singaporean overseas, bearing in mind that not every Singapore who lives overseas is an exile.
Many Singaporeans today are well-travelled and it is imperative that the Singapore government makes it more conducive for Singaporeans to expand their wealth through overseas acquisitions. Singapore is, after all, a small island city with limited resources. But it is through the wealth and acquisition holdings of its citizens and business organisations, that Singapore’s national wealth grows.
And don’t expect the Jackie Chan’s and Chow Yuen Fatt’s of this world to “immigrate” to Singapore and make films in Singapore. Singapore is getting famous for importing world class sports people… but let’s not start that in film-making just yet please. We are not likely to see Mr Chow and Mr Chan do a locally produced kungfu movie called “Ageing Pirates of the Straits of Malacca” in the next decade!
3) More transparency and more public awareness needs to be created about who are behind the film censorship and appeals committees and how they are selected from the public. In this modern age, where there are questions about religious organisations hiding slush funds, questions about burqas, questions about political transparency, etc etc. – it is clear the public does not like anything that lacks transparency. “Hiding” is no longer acceptable.
So the Singapore government should instead be responding by showing it has nothing to hide compared to the so-called exiles. This is what it means to take the moral higher ground, while demonstrating integrity. In other words, the Singapore government should support the local film documentary industry in the making of a reply / response to Tan Pin Pin’s To Singapore With Love.
This post was first published as a comment at a ST article. We thank Mr Tham for allowing us to reproduce here. 

Subscribe
Notify of
4 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Little India Riot: The police officer who braved the odds

By Terry Xu Testifying before the Committee of Inquiry (COI) for the…

Yale-NUS students petition against "violent suppression of peaceful student protesters" in India's Islamic universities, criticise Citizenship Amendment Act

Students and affiliates of Singapore’s Yale-NUS College on Thu (19 Dec) drafted…

SGX grants in-principle approval to SIA for issuing proposed rights

An in-principle approval has been received by Singapore Airlines (SIA) from the…

网传SAFRA团拜晚宴照办为红包? 司仪“一哥”抨击造谣者

截至昨日(8日),在裕廊战备军人协会俱乐部(SAFRA)举行的歌唱班团拜晚宴感染群,累计确诊病例已激增至30起,包括其中一场晚宴的歌唱导师也确诊。 承办上述晚宴的,是位于SAFRA Jurong的美满楼餐厅。2月15日当晚有两场新春团拜活动,约600人出席。 其中一场晚宴据知是由歌唱导师梁凤艺主办,梁凤艺在本月7日也发简讯通知歌唱班学生,“同学们早上好!我已确诊感染病毒!希望同学们留意身体的状况如有不适请尽快就医!” 不过,在社交媒体上流传一段Whatsapp录音,“爆料者”在谈话中似乎和名为“Amy”的友人谈话,指为何当晚晚宴不改期、取消?因为主办者要“收红包”。当天两位歌唱导师高飞和梁凤艺,同天在同一场所办活动;且有出席者认为出了60块钱,不去可惜;“爆料者”也担忧若出席的600人没办法追踪监控“会完蛋”。 “爆料者”自称已待在家一两个月、活动都取消。 至于梁凤艺的“干哥哥”,艺名“一哥”的王先生早前则在《联合早报》为前者澄清,梁在晚宴前曾犹豫是否要如期举办,但和一些学生商量后,大家都鼓励她如期进行。 根据一哥说法, 由于临近晚宴主办日期,酒楼也不希望她取消。再来不希望已购票学生失望,所以才照办。 一哥是受邀主持当晚晚宴。他曾向《8视界》表示,已叮嘱出席者要小心,避免握手,只要“恭喜恭喜招招手”,也在台上提醒大家使用公尺母筷。 晚宴出现确诊病例,令他也感到纳闷“怎么会有漏网之鱼?”也直言“防范措施都做了,”是否现有检测机制都要检讨。 他说看到对梁凤艺的各种指责感到痛心,遗憾有造谣者企图落井下石。…