By Ghui
To Singapore With Love poster FFF2014The movie opened with the most mundane and domestic of scenes – a father cooking char kuey teow for his family while talking about Singapore.
In that home setting and with the uncharacteristic London sun shining through the windows, the cacophony of the clanging wok and the sizzling and sputtering sounds of hissing cooking oil, Ho Juan Thai could have been in Singapore in an alternate reality.
Instead, the exile who fled Singapore for fear of political persecution is a million miles away from home and has no hope of return in the foreseeable future.
In his interview for “To Singapore, With Love” – the film banned by the Media Development Authority for presenting a “distorted and untruthful” of the exiles – Juan Thai is at once hopeful, wistful and full of unmistakable love for his country. His emotions arouse in the viewer a strong sense of patriotism, not one driven by any political agenda but a simple sense of belonging, inexplicable and unexplainable: We are Singaporean. Beyond politics, beyond ideology, Singapore is our home.
Dr Ang Swee Chai was also featured in the film, and should rightfully be recognised as a Singaporean who has done her country proud. An eminent doctor who has spent many years volunteering for the Palestinian cause, she is much respected in the UK and in the Middle East. She has even authored a book – From Beirut to Jerusalem and been on Ted Talks. In the film, she talks of her passions, her commitment to social causes and of her late husband, Francis Khoo and how he inspired her. It was her love for him that led to her leaving Singapore to start from scratch in London.
Sacrificing for love, committing to social work, giving back to the community, a global outlook – these are qualities that all Singaporeans should have. It is a great pity that many Singaporeans will not have the opportunity to be inspired by her.
As a viewer, I felt proud that she hailed from our little red dot and saddened that this film cannot be shown in Singapore on the basis of “national security” when not much was about national security at all. Instead, it is a story about how one simple life can make a world of difference if you would only try.
The film then travels to Betong, Thailand where the funeral of Liu Bio was held. Set amidst chanting monks and the bustle of an Asian city, the viewer is immediately given a great sense of place. Indeed, much of the film is a cultural feast for the eyes. Each change in destination begins with scenes of passing traffic and street life, capturing context while enriching the senses.
At Liu Bio’s funeral, Wong Soon Fong talks about Operation Coldstore, and how he escaped with fellow elected parliamentarian, Chan Sun Wing from Singapore after they were marked for arrest, and how many of Singaporeans are left in Thailand. His message was an account of his life and that of his fellow comrades.
Seamlessly moving across countries, the audience finds itself in London yet again with Tan Wah Piow, a student activist who was unceremoniously arrested and imprisoned in the 70s. His crime? Fighting for the rights of workers who were being retrenched without pay. While the government may have viewed this as “rioting”, film director Tan Pin Pin manages masterfully to give the audience an insight into Wah Piow’s life without preaching any political message.
A factual and objective account of Wah Piow’s fight for workers’ rights, arrest and flight was given while we are given a glimpse of his day to day life. We see that Wah Piow is a lawyer. We see him interacting with his clients and we see him at his book launch in Kuala Lumpur. He has made a very successful life for himself and his family in the UK without compromising on any of his principles.
The film travels yet again. This time to Hat Yai, Thailand. Here Yap Wan Pin and Tan Hee Kim are introduced. Despite having to leave their home, Yap and Tan have managed to build a thriving noodle factory. Although physically away from Singapore, they still keep abreast of Singaporean news.
Their days as guerrillas in the jungle are long past although they still have a keen interest in political affairs. Does that make one a threat to national security? In my humble opinion, not.
He Jin and his wife give an account of the guerrilla warfare waged by the communists in the jungles of Malaysia and Thailand.  It was not a call to arms to stir communist fervour nor was it in any way an incitement against the status quo. How did a Singaporean end up waging war in the jungles? It was a piece of human story that ought to be part of the annals of the wider Singapore narrative.
It is also in Hat Yai that Chan Sun Wing reads a moving poem about Singapore retracing his journey and reaffirming his love and loyalty to a place that was once his home. It moved me to tears – not for any political fervour but I was shamed by how little I love my country in comparison to him.
Many other former political detainees shared their personal stories in the film – such as Tan Kok Fang’s and Said Zahari’s accounts about Operation Coldstore. Instead of inciting political hatred, their stories served as a timely reminder that the Internal Security Act needs to be repealed, having outlived its purpose and is in reality little more than a tool of repression that we no longer need.
Beautifully edited, “To Singapore, With Love” is visually pleasing and cleverly weaves between east and west – in many ways, mirroring Singapore’s position in history as having influences from both east and west as a former British colony, located at the tip of the Malay Archipelago with inhabitants from many parts of the world.
As the film progresses, it becomes crystal clear that this is not a film about politics. It is a film about life. It is a chronicle of how Singaporeans live their lives outside of Singapore. It follows their livelihood and home life. The audience enters their homes and meet their families.
The only difference is that these individuals cannot simply jump onto a plane and visit Singapore like other Singaporeans abroad can. Therein lie the haunting and poignant scenes of family reunions and precious memories.
Read also “Part 2: Only threat is to lost opportunities” to find out about the author’s perspective on the film.
Like this article? Support us so that we can do more. Subscribe to TOC here.

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

警方对辣玉莎贴文给予严重警告 惟不对网红“夏雪”采取行动

因两年前评论城市丰收教会判决,工人党盛港集选区议员辣玉莎在本届大选竞选期间,被举报言论涉种族主义,结果被警方调查。 警方今日(17日)发表声明,指出经过调查,辣玉莎在2018年2月2日和今年5月17日发表的网络评论,“有意挑起不同族群间敌意”,抵触触刑事法典第298A(a)条文。 而有关评论城市丰收教会判决的贴文,也因藐视法庭而抵触司法维护法令(Administration of Justice(Protection)Act)。 警方称经过于总检察署商讨后,决定给予辣玉莎严厉警告。 针对城市丰收教会判决,辣玉莎曾批评新加坡无情监禁少数群体、骚扰清真寺领袖,但容许涉贪教会领袖逍遥法外。同时,在社媒也评论新加坡执法机构,涉歧视公民,指富有华人和白人有不同待遇。 然而,在选举期间,遭民众举报涉族群言论的并不仅是辣玉莎一人。本地网红“下雪”也同样被人“翻旧账”,十年前的推特(Twitter)贴文,也被人举报而被警方调查。 事实上,当辣玉莎在选举期间卷入族群言论风波,原名郑彦彦的“下雪”。还曾在社交媒体Instagram抨击辣玉莎的言论,是指控大部分华人在法律上会选边站,也似乎意指本地执法机构由华人掌控。她质问辣玉莎是否适合成为候选人: 郑彦彦被一名网民Vignesh Sankar Iyer,找到她在2010年发布于Twitter的推文,指她的言论也涉嫌种族歧视,向警方报案。…

【2020财政预算案】技能创前程培训计划措施 25岁以上国人将获500元补贴

政府将为25岁及以上的国人提供一次性的500元技能创前程培训补助金,而40岁至60岁还会获得额外的500元相关补助金,惟国人必须在今年10月1日至2025年年杪前使用。 该补助金是政府为了推动国人继续学习新技能,而推出的技能创前程计划的部分新阶段措施。 副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰在国会发表新财政预算案声明时指出,技能创前程计划的新阶段涵盖了三大要点,即个人提升、加强员工培训的企业角色,以及专门为中途转业者提供协助。 40-60岁获1000元补助金 40岁至60岁国人的补助金额为1000元,主要是为了让他们能够修读教育与培训中心所提供的技能提升课程。 王瑞杰表示,政府将推出技能创前程中年转业援助配套,让这年龄层的国人能够在职场内保留生产力,也可以选择挑战新的工作岗位或新职业。 政府放眼在2025年之前,每年能够协助更多在这个年龄阶段的国人转业,大约人数为5500人。 因此,政府将会增加技能更新计划的数量。 为了确保提高企业聘请员工,保留本地中年员工的能力,将会为相关企业提供奖励,即聘请中年员工的企业将获得长达半年的20巴仙薪金补助,顶限总数不超过6000元。 提供一万元企业补助金 他指出,为了鼓励雇主进行企业和员工转型,政府将推出技能创前程企业补助金(Skills Future…

Youth arrested under ISA on Restriction Orders for two years

A 17 year-old Singaporean youth who was arrested under the Internal Security Act…