TIP interagency taskforceStop Trafficking SG, a group made up of six non-governmental organisations, had responded to a letter by the Interagency Taskforce on Trafficking in Persons, stating that the letter from the Taskforce “is inappropriately timed as the matter is now in Parliament and that process ought to take over first.”
The matter in question is the Prevention of Human Trafficking Bill. Stop Trafficking SG had been lobbying for more clauses to be included in the Bill, including shielding victims from prosecution for immigration infractions and giving them the right to continue working while their cases are pending. Their focus was to provide more victim protection rather than giving more powers for legal enforcement.
The group had earlier sent a note to Members of Parliament (MPs) to disseminate relevant information for the debate in parliament on the Bill and had requested to meet Members of Parliament. Stop Trafficking SG had earlier submitted a 11-page critique of the bill to MP Christopher de Souza, who was to present the proposed new law in Parliament.
They felt that it was inappropriate for the Taskforce to respond to their sent note as it would seem to be pre-empting the Parliamentary debate.
Stop Trafficking SG emphasised that civil society groups, as well as private citizens should have channels to engage directly with MPs on any bill and do not think “it is appropriate for the civil service to respond on behalf of Members of Parliament as it detracts from this part of the democratic process.”
The Taskforce is jointly led by the Home Affairs and Manpower ministries, and is made up of representatives from the Singapore Police Force (SPF), Immigration and Checkpoints Authority (ICA), Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF), Ministry of Health (MOH), Ministry of Law (MinLaw), Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) and the Attorney General’s Chambers (AGC).
“Prior to its introduction in Parliament on 7 October 2014, the Taskforce and Mr de Souza held extensive public consultation via six focus group dialogue sessions and the REACH portal,” the Taskforce had indicated in the letter.
It had also stated that the enforcement agencies have always benchmarked practices to international standards.
They pointed out that the 294 labour cases cited in the report by Stop Trafficking SG had referred to enquiries and feedback from civil society organisations relating to an array of issues including short payment of salary, not paying proper overtime rates and poor standards of accommodation. Through investigations, only a minority were found to be suspected trafficking cases.
The Taskforce further noted that trafficking is a serious offence and the agencies have to investigate carefully to substantiate the action, means and purpose elements of the offence, as aligned with international standards. “We cannot adopt loose definitions as there are severe penalties involved,” said the Taskforce.
The full response from Stop Trafficking SG

The Prevention of Human Trafficking Bill is slated for debate in Parliament in November. As NGOs that organised the StopTraffickingSG Campaign, we sent our note to MPs to disseminate relevant information for Parliamentary debate on the Bill. In our note, we had also requested to meet Members of Parliament.
Instead our request was met by a response from the Inter-Agency Task Force on Trafficking in Persons. We do not think this was appropriate because by responding to our note that had been addressed to MPs, the Taskforce seems to be pre-empting the Parliamentary debate before it has even started. Moreover, civil society groups, as well as private citizens, ought to have channels to engage directly with members of parliament on any bill, given the supreme legislative authority of Parliament in a democratic system and the accountability of parliamentarians to their electorate. We do not think it is appropriate for the civil service to respond on behalf of members of parliament as it detracts from this part of the democratic process.
The response, furthermore, is inappropriately timed as the matter is now in parliament and that process ought to take over first. Be that as it may, we appreciate the concerns raised by the Task Force in its letter and StopTraffickingSG looks forward to continuing to engage with the Inter-Agency Task Force to tackle trafficking in persons in Singapore.

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

向女友求欢不成竟暴力相向 医生面五控状

向女友求欢不成恼羞成怒,医生抡起拳头打人,甚至按着她的头撞墙,还禁锢她不让她回家,一直到警察找上门后才罢休,被控蓄意重伤他人、非法禁锢等五项罪状。 身为一名代班家庭医生的被告张顺杰(35岁),昨日(11月4日)在国家法院面控,主要以蓄意重伤罪和非法禁锢罪进行审讯,其余的三项罪状暂时搁置,其中包括受害者曾经三次于2017年3月遭被告施暴后,报警备案。 他被控于2017年8月27日凌晨4时12分,在红山弄的一个组屋单位内,即在被告的住家中,对其前女友林恩慧(27岁)施暴。 据控方的开庭陈词指出,被告父亲当天听到被告和受害者的争吵声,因此报警求助。警方抵达现场时现要求被告开门,但是被告拒绝后,警方就破门而入。警方指出,当时只见被告和受害者在房中,受害者当时坐在一个角落哭泣,满脸鲜血且脸青鼻肿,而被告躺在床上,身上只穿着四角裤。 警方随后将被告逮捕,并将受害者送进医院。 蓄意重伤罪状指被告在案发时,多次拳打受害者,并按着她的头去撞墙,导致她脸部多处骨折,且手尾指骨折;而非法禁锢受害者,则是指他锁住房门,阻止受害者离开回家。 被告皆不承认这两项控状,并表示他在案发当时已经喝醉了,不记得发生了什么事情,也请陈其玉律师进行抗辩。 在昨日开审中,受害者率先供证,指两人是在2017年2月,透过交友应用程序认识,随后发展成为恋人,但是在案发后已经分手了。 她指出,两人在案发前一晚曾到卡拉OK和两家夜店拍拖,且都点了酒精饮料,一直到凌晨2时才回到被告住家。 她表示,当时被告曾两次向她求欢,但是都被拒绝了,她甚至想要离开房间避开,却因此激怒被告,将她拉回房间锁上门后,就开始对她施暴,甚至按着她的头去撞墙。 期间,辩方律师曾指出,受害者在回家路上曾对被告作出性暗示,还在车上为其口交,但是受害者中指出,两人只是在停车场,当被告停好车后才发生了关系,并没有在对方开车时帮他口交。 率先到场的两名警员在供证时表示,他们抵达现场时,被告父亲告知被告和受害者在房中争吵,他们当时曾先敲门,要求对方开门。但是在听到一名女子的求救声后,就决定破门入室。…

马国宗教活动1万6000人出席!

根据马国媒体报导,在上月27日至3月1日,于吉隆坡大城堡Masjid Jamek回教堂举行的2020年大马传教士集会,多达1万6000人出席,其中有1万4500名都是马国人。 根据马国卫生总监诺希山在今日凌晨发布的图表,显示上述活动的出席人数,根据该图表,目前于该集会感染群有关的国内外人士有17人,分别为大马6人以及汶莱11人。 另一方面,马国东马砂拉越也出现三起确诊病例,其中两名患者也曾出席上述活动。 不过,根据我国卫生部文告,截至本月12日中午12时,本地新增的九起九起武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)确诊病例中,其中有两名国人曾出席上述活动,他们是第183例(29岁男公民)和187例(48岁男公民)。 目前已知我国有多达95人曾出席有关活动,我国卫生部正进行追踪确认参与者。 主管回教事务的环境及水源部长马善高也已宣布,今日起本地所有回教堂将关闭五天,进行消毒清洗,而回教堂也将在未来两周内取消所有活动与课程。  

Navigating Singapore’s new media environment

S’poreans need to cease being observers on the sidelines, says Gerald Giam.

Nielsen: Consumer confidence in Singapore falls to two-year low amid economic uncertainties

Consumer confidence in Singapore has sunk to a two-year low according to…